|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can join PEPIS here if you wish http://groups.google.com/group/pepis
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:36:05 -0800
Well done again to Steve Watson for being one of the only journalists in the world to pick up on Norman Baker's sporting second chance for Tony Blair to tell the truth. In this short bulletin I'll be relating some of my own experiences with crucial letters being 'spirited away' in the post and with my own realisation that several lines of enquiry I have been pursuing for the last ten years are, in fact, one and the same.
A criminal hand revealed
I have been in touch with LibDem MP for Lewes Norman Baker over PM Blair's Bilderberg denial last year in the House of Commons. As many will know by now I visited Ayrshire just after the 1998 conference and spoke to a woman who was working at the hotel.
She casually mentioned to me, with no prompting, that she'd served Tony Blair his breakfast one morning during the conference, which strongly suggests he was sleeping at the hotel and didn't just drop by for a celebrity appearance. Blair was not on the semi-official attendance list that year but his Defence Secretary George Robertson, who was about to be made Secretary General of NATO, was. http://www.bilderberg.org/1998.htm
In the first week in December 2006 Norman Baker's office at Portcullis House opposite Parliament sent me a letter authorising me to investigate Blair's presence or otherwise at the Turnberry meeting to show that I was a bona fide journalist working for him. That letter never arrived. His office sent me another letter, that didn't arrive either. At this point I knew the post was being illegally intercepted by someone either inside the House of Commons mail system or at the Bristol area sorting office in Filton and that either Norman Baker's phone and/or my own were being monitored. It is impossible to call lying politicians to account when they have criminal collaberators who listen in to telephone calls and have the power to destroy communications between journalists and MPs at will.
I have informed Norman's office and filed a 'lost mail' complaint with Royal Mail. Meanwhile the newish bilderberg.org forum was hacked earlier today. What I am always interested in when something like this happens is what was being discussed on the 'discussion libre' topic that was deleted? I this case it was negotiations which are proceeding with pope Benedict for the Roman Catholic Church to amalgamate with the Protestant churches. It seems that Benedict - who I dubbed the Diabolical pope for his ill-informed attacks on Islam - has been listening closely to his two new Bilderberg advisers, Peter Sutherland and Henry Kissinger on this one. The implication being that large churches such as these need to be brought together to make them easier for these totalitarians to control. One also wonders how much of the catholic congregations' collection money is going to Kissinger and his Associate?
People often ask me whether I have any proof that Bilderberg is controlled by freemasons. The proof I do have is that the last conference to take place in the UK was organised by one Andrew Palmer, who was also Private Secretary to the world's number one freemason, Grand Master of United Grand Lodge, the Duke of Kent.
http://www.bilderberg.org/1998.htm#palmer
So whatever precautions freemasons take to ensure that press and public never find out whether or not they are freemasons, a tyrrany of the mediocre. They are only in their public positions due to promotion and privilege within 'the craft'. For those of you who don't know a lot about freemasonry it is within the Royal Arch chapters that financially and politically motivated freemasons congregate. Many masons are unaware of the control-freakery of these higher degree masons who really have convinced themselves that they are 'elite' superior beings who can prey on ordinary members of the public with a clear concience. How perfectly this dovetails in with Bilderberg. Which is a political and economic global policy expression of that amoral elitism so characteritic of Nazi Germany.
HRH Duke of Kent - official site
http://www.royal.gov.uk/output/Page5617.asp
HRH Duke of Kent's meteoric masonic rise: initiated 12th December 1963, made Grand Master of United Grand Lodge 27th June 1967 First Grand Principal of the Supreme Grand Chapter of Royal Arch Masons of England
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HRH_The_Duke_of_Kent
HRH Duke of Edinburgh initiated 5th December 1952 (Masonic Yearbooks)
In November 2006 I went on a rare tour of Bristol's masonic hall in
Park street...
http://bristol.indymedia.org/newswire.php?story_id=25574Array&sc=1
...where I was amazed to see, in the royal arch temple, two giant columns with domes on the top which I can only describe as phallic...
http://bristol.indymedia.org/attachments/nov2006/royalarch.jpg
...this wouldn't worry me so much if it wasn't for the fact that this temple is modelled on a Jewish synagogue. It has the flags of the twelve tribes of Israel and any orthodox Jew would recognise the layout immediately. But no natural light is allowed in and the masons guiding us round confessed to conducting ceremonies in there where only a single candle lit the entire place. Quite spooky sounding and a blasphemous travesty of Solomon's temple.
And these two issues have again come together with allegatons in the Enigma TV dvd 'Illuminati Volume I' and elsewhere that Tony Blair is himself a Royal Arch freemason and a member of 1591 United Studholme Alliance Lodge which, according to my Masonic Yearbook, meets at No. 10 Duke Street St. James, LONDON SW1Y 6BS, on the 1st Wednesday in February, the 3rd Wednesday in March, the 4th Wednesday in May and has an installation meeting for new members on 3rd Wednesday in October.
1591's Royal Arch chapter meets on the 3rd Wednesday in January and May as well as the 1st Wednesday in October. Last month I recorded and interview with Russian television outside 'the other number ten' which has a brass plate saying "Supreme Council, Ring Once". Some friendly masons turned up while we were filming and so I asked them what the Supreme Council was. They explained it was the headquaters of their branch of advanced freemasonry which was the Rose-Croix, otherwise known as Rosicrucians, who are one of the modern occult societies most closely associated with the medieval Knights Templar, and said by some to be identical to Weishaupt's Illuminati.
So you see, the hacking into my forum today and the theft of letters to me from one of Britain's most astute MPs has prompted something ratherdifferent. A call for Tony Blair to account for his masonic movements at Turnberry and, rather closer to home, in London's elite district of St. James. The tired old Blair puppet doesn't have long left on the stage but how much better for him to be removed by the press, MPs and by the people rather than one by the financial elite's two puppet parties. Now back to Steve Watson's report.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
British MP Asking More Questions About Bilderberg
This time the next Prime Minister is the focus
Steve Watson
http://www.infowars.net/articles/january2007/110107Bilderberg.htm
Thursday, January 11, 2007
A British MP, who previously asked Prime Minister Tony Blair to reveal
details of any Bilderberg meetings he has attended, has now officially
asked the current Chancellor of the Exchequer, and most likely next
Prime Minister, to reveal details of his own attendances at Bilderberg.
Norman Baker, MP for Lewes, has officially requested that Gordon Brown
provide an oral or written answer to the following question:
Norman Baker (Lewes): To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, in which
years since 1997 (a) he and (b) other Treasury Ministers have attended
meetings of the Bilderberg Group.
The question has been officially submitted and it will now take a few
weeks before it is answered in the House of Commons.
Mr Baker previously asked Tony Blair the same question, to which Blair
answered "I have not attended any such meetings."
Blair may not have attended since he came to power but he certainly was
"groomed" by the secretive group, at the same time as Bill Clinton,
before either were elected into office.
It will be interesting to note Brown's answer given that he is known to
have attended the Bilderberg Conference when he was shadow Chancellor
of the Exchequer in 1991 and possibly again in 1995.
In a separate development, an answer has been provided to a question
about Bilderberg that was raised in the House of Lords:
Official Travel: Bilderberg Conference
Lord Stoddart of Swindon asked Her Majesty's Government:
Whether any Ministers attended the Bilderberg Conference in Ottawa
between 8 and 11 June; if so, whether they attended in a ministerial or
private capacity; whether they made contributions to debates; and, if
so, on which subjects.[HL7569]
Lord Bassam of Brighton answered: All ministerial visits are conducted
in accordance with the Ministerial Code and Travel by Ministers. Since
1999, the Government have published annually a list of overseas travel
by Cabinet Ministers costing over £500 and the total cost of all
ministerial travel. Information for 2005-06 was published on Monday 24
July 2006. Copies are available in the Library for the reference of
noble Lords. Information for 2006-07 will be published as soon as
possible after the end of the financial year. Information on other
Ministers' travel is not collected centrally.
There was no response indicating what subjects were discussed by said
ministers in attendance.
http://home.planet.nl/~reijd050/organisations/Pilgrims_Society.htm
Since this article first appeared, knowledge about this group has greatly expanded. This first version of this article was written after about 400 names were gathered and largely analyzed; and even before any work had been done on Le Cercle and the 1001. Now we are up to at least 1500 names, including many recent ones. It will take a lot of time to do bios on these members, analyze them, and give sources with each name, but for now it can be safely concluded that many members consistently are recruited from ALL the major banks, insurance companies, and law firms in New York and London. At the same time, Pilgrims flow in and out of the elected and permanent governments of the US and UK.
I suggest you take a look at the introduction page and appendix B where the origins of this group and its influence is discussed in a bit more detail. I also suggest you check out the work of Charles Savoie, who has been publishing a lot of work on Pilgrims since late 2004.
New information on the Pilgrims might be released via the front page at times, or not. Not sure.
Finally, I also suggest you take a look at this chart, which has been put together by looking at the individual biographies of the Pilgrims Society members.
The Pilgrims Society, an aristocratic Anglo-American dining club, was established over a century ago and meets at least two or three times a year. Its membership consists of the most influential bankers, lawyers, insurance brokers, and businessmen from the New York and London areas. A handful of career politicians also come from Washington. The club's primary purpose is to keep the ties between the United States and Britain as close as possible.
The London chapter of the Pilgrims Society was established on July 11, 1902, followed by a New York chapter on January 13, 1903. Its patron is the British monarch, who has plenty of representatives attending the meetings. A member of the Royal family usually attends the London diners.
As you'll find out by looking at the membership list, the Pilgrims Society has clearly fused together the business centers of New York and London, together with a large portion of the political centers of both nations. Ninety percent of the American members are top-level bankers and businessmen from New York city.
Only a couple of Pilgrims own or chair companies with headquarters in Boston or Philadelphia. Businesses that have their headquarters in any other location than this small part of the north-east corner of the United States don't seem to be represented at all (do keep in mind that recent data is sketchy). Relatively few government officials from Washington are recruited into the Pilgrims Society. Officials from outside the UK or US visit the club occasionally. In the past they usually came from countries incorporated within the British Empire or the Commonwealth, most notably Canada and Australia.
A mistake usually made when people refer to this society, is when they call it the 'Pilgrim Society', because this name hasn't been used that often. The most often used name is the 'Pilgrims Society', sometimes spelled as 'Pilgrim's Society'. You might think this isn't such a big deal, but when you search the internet or some archives for the 'Pilgrim Society', you will hardly find any official sources, simply because they all refer to the 'Pilgrims Society'. The name 'Pilgrims Society' is also unique, so you won't confuse it with this one. Also try searching on 'The Pilgrims' or more specifically, the 'Pilgrims of the United States' and the 'Pilgrims of the United Kingdom'/'Pilgrims of Great Britain'.
The club is secret. It might be one of those 'open-secrets', but it's secret nonetheless. If it wasn't, we would have read about it in the history books, we would know all the details of the meetings, and we would have membership lists in the public domain. It is possible to find quite a bit of information in regular newspaper archives, but you really have to look for it. It takes forever to piece the story together. For example, The Scotsman made numerous references to it in the first half of the century (archives are only available up to 1950 atm). Time Magazine made them much less, but still referred to the club once every few years. After 1958, Time only mentioned the club 2 or 3 times, even though meetings continued as usual. Other newspapers in the U.S., like the New York Times and the Washington Post have referred the Pilgrims at times. The Wall Street Journal on the other hand never mentioned a whole lot about this dining club at any time in the past century. The Times of London mentioned the society a couple of times in the past 10 years, even though, as all the other papers, it didn't give many details about who's attending. Most other newspapers, including the Scotsman, New York Post, Washington Times, or even the Guardian, seem to have been (almost) completely silent about the Pilgrims in the last 5 to 7 years (that's how far the digital archives go back). In other countries it's virtually impossible to get any information on the Pilgrims. Not one large Dutch newspaper has mentioned the name in the past 20 years. References in German or French newspapers are just as uncommon. One thing you actually càn find, is different speeches on official websites; One at NATO, another one at the State Department, and yet another one from 1999 on the MoD website. They all deal with one little speech and when you ask for some background information you won't get any replies. And that's strange. Maybe it's done to give people the impression there's nothing unusual about the club. Indeed, looking at the speeches there certainly isn't. All they do is talk about regular pro-NATO politics and kiss up to their "brothers" on the other side of the ocean. Two recent examples:
[1] January 2002, Lord Robertson, 'NATO after September 11'
[2] November 2002, Richard Boucher on Foreign policy, the EU, and NATO
You can find other speeches in the references at the bottom of this article. Of course, it's probably not because of the speeches that the Pilgrims Society keeps itself out of the public eye. More likely it's because of who's being informed and for what purpose. Also, it's obvious that members discuss a lot of other business among themselves.
As already stated, those who own or run the major banking houses, law firms, and insurance companies in the London and New York area will be invited to join, together with a few very specific government officials. This always includes the president of the United States, the U.S. Secretary of State and the U.S. ambassador to Great Britain. On the right you can see which other delegates traditionally are recruited into Pilgrims. Chancellors, Chief Justices, and Attorney Generals seem to be frequent members also. Occasional exceptions have been made to allow writers, composers and art collectors into the society. An example of that was Mark Twain.
The patron of the Pilgrims Society is the king or queen of England and a member from the royal family usually attends the Pilgrim dinners in Great Britain.
That's basically all there is to this Pilgrims Society; it's a dining club. Several times a year a dinner is planned and the board chooses which members it will invite this time, usually somewhere between 300 and 500. A few additional people are invited to hold a speech on a variety of political topics and someone is made the guest of honor. This guest of honor is usually a new member or a Pilgrim who has accomplished something worth remembering. In addition, the chairman of the Society (in Britain it is Robert M. Worcester atm) might give a speech to the CFR or the RIIA once in a while. As already demonstrated, the speeches are both boring and interesting at the same time. Boring because of their substance, and interesting because they show us that Pilgrims, as a whole, aren't privy to many state secrets.
A great example of the cooperation between the London and American Pilgrims is the London Bush House, which was ordered to be built in 1919 by Pilgrim Irving T. Bush, a N.Y. businessman. At the time it was the most expensive building in the world and was meant to be an Anglo-American trade center where buyers could purchase goods in one place. It lost its original function after a couple of decades, but still exists today as an office to the BBC World Service. Above the entrance there's a large statue, which represents this Anglo-American cooperation.
Britain is represented on the left by the lions, the USA is represented on the right by the Eagle. The Celtic cross indicates their common heritage. The torch can represent freedom, wisdom, victory, or something along that line. Below the statue you'll find the inscription "To the friendship of English Speaking Peoples".
The Pilgrims Society is allied with the English-Speaking Union, which is an organization that promotes the use of the English language all over the world. The patron is the English queen and the president is prince Philip. The chairman, as far as we know, is always a member of the Pilgrims.
All the important members of the 1910 Jekyll Island meeting were Pilgrims; Vanderlip, Strong, Warburg, Davison, Norton, and Aldrich. Senator Aldrich's closest ally in congress, Edward B. Vreeland, was a Pilgrim too, together with his brother. Vreeland helped Aldrich establish a privately owned central bank. Of course, J.P. Morgan, George F. Baker, John D. Rockefeller, and Jacob Schiff were members also. Keep in mind these people were often competing with each other and weren't necessarily friends, as so many (conspiracy-oriented) people seem to think.
N.Y. FED 'Pilgrim-presidents':
Red = confirmed Pilgrim
Pilgrim-presidents of the New York Federal Reserve Bank cover the period from 1914 to 1979. The 4 presidents since then have not been members as far as we know, although that's probably because of a lack of recent data. Pilgrim-chairmen of the New York Federal Reserve cover almost the entire period from the 1920s up to 1990, so we can safely assume that the New York Federal Reserve Bank is owned by the Pilgrims. That's not that unusual, because New York itself is Pilgrims property.
Because the Pilgrims have a large influence on Washington politics, it would be interesting to see if they have any members on the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, also located in D.C. If we have those names, we can estimate the Pilgrims' level of control over the Federal Open Market Committee. The FOMC is the main body of the Federal Reserve that decides on the monetary policy. The New York FED then carries out those directives through its daily 'open market operations'. In the words of the official Federal Reserve website that I just gave a link to:
"Finally, the Committee [FOMC] must reach a consensus regarding the appropriate course for policy, which is incorporated in a directive to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York-the Bank that executes transactions for the System Open Market Account. The directive is cast in terms designed to provide guidance to the Manager in the conduct of day-to-day open market operations. The directive sets forth the Committee's objectives for long-run growth of certain key monetary and credit aggregates. It also sets forth operating guidelines for the degree of ease or restraint to be sought in reserve conditions and expectations with regard to short-term rates of growth in the monetary aggregates."
The FOMC consists of the 7 FED governors, 1 permanent New York FED president, and 4 presidents of the other 11 FED banks that rotate each year. The chairman of the board of governors is also the chairman of the FOMC, and the president of the permanently represented New York FED is the vice chairman of the FOMC. We quote from the same page:
"...Traditionally, the Chairman of the Board of Governors is elected Chairman and the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York is elected Vice Chairman..."
When sifting through the members list, it turns out that at least 4 of the 13 Federal Reserve chairmen are confirmed Pilgrims (they cover the years 1933-1934 & 1959-1987). Two other chairmen, Eugene Meyer and Alan Greenspan, have all the trademarks of being Pilgrims members. If that could be confirmed, the FED's Board of Governors has had Pilgrims as chairman from at least 1930 to 1934 & from 1959 on to 2005. In any case, the Pilgrims Society seems to be represented a disproportionate amount on the most influential places inside the U.S. monetary system, especially for a society that doesn't want its existence to be known to the general public. It is likely that at least since 1959 the chairman and vice chairman of the FOMC were Pilgrims, together with the persons carrying out the directives of the FOMC through the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
After analyzing the Pilgrims Society members list of about 360 names (updated in the meantime), I found that the institutions you see on the left were the most often represented. About 75% of this list is American and 25% British (rough estimate). This means that about 1 in 3 of the U.S. members of the Pilgrims Society is a confirmed member of the CFR. Striking is the fact that such a large percentage of CFR members are executive officers. About 50% of all the CFR executive officers have been confirmed members of the Pilgrims Society, which seems to indicate that quite possibly all of them are.
I remember looking at an old documentary about the CFR "master conspiracy". The usual stuff came by; banking, the Illuminati and the dollar bill. At the end they showed these concentric rings, indicating the CFR had unknown inner circles. Guess we can now say for sure what the second circle is, counting from the outside. It's the Pilgrims Society and it undeniably shows the close link between American and British foreign policy.
Of course, it has long been speculated that the same group that set up the RIIA, set up the CFR, but I was never convinced enough though, because the group connecting both organizations has never been fully identified. The existence of the Round Table, however likely, has never been proven. For now, the Pilgrims Society, a seemingly larger body, is a fine substitute, because it shares many similarities with the "association of helpers" from the Round Table. Read this text from the 1966 book 'Tragedy and Hope - A history of the world in our time', written by Oxford professor Carroll Quigley:
"In 1891, Rhodes organized a secret society with members in a "Circle of Initiates" and an outer circle known as the "Association of Helpers" later organized as the Round Table organization. In 1909-1913, they organized semi-secret groups know as Round Table Groups in the chief British dependencies and the United States..
The Round Table Groups were semi-secret discussion and lobbying groups whose original purpose was to federate the English speaking world along lines laid down by Cecil Rhodes. By 1915, Round Table groups existed in seven countries including England, South Africa, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, India and the United States. Money for their activities originally came from Cecil Rhodes, J.P. Morgan, the Rockefeller and Whitney families and associates of bankers Lazard Brothers and Morgan, Grenfell and Company.
The chief backbone of this organization grew up along the already existing financial cooperation running from the Morgan Bank in New York to a group of international financiers in London led by Lazard Brothers.
Lionel Curtis established in England and each dominion a front organization to the existing local Round Table Group. This front organization called the Royal Institute of Public Affairs, had as its nucleus in each area the existing submerged Round Table Group.
In New York, it was known as the Council on Foreign Relations and was a front for J.P. Morgan and Company in association with the very small American Round Table Group. The American organizers were dominated by the large number of Morgan "experts" including Lamont and Beer, who had gone to the Paris Peace Conference and there became close friends with the similar group of English "experts" which had been recruited by the Milner group. In fact, the original plans for the Royal Institute and the Council on Foreign Relations. In 1928, the Council on Foreign Relations was dominated by the associates of the Morgan bank. Closely allied with this Morgan influence were a small group of Wall Street lawyers whose chief figures were Elihu Root, John W. Davis, the Dulles Brothers, John J. McCloy...
...There does exist and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates to some extent in the way the Radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so...
...It might be pointed out that the existence of this Wall Street Anglo-American axis is quite obvious once it is pointed out. It is reflected by the fact that such Wall Street luminaries such as John W. Davis, Lewis Douglas, [John] Whitney and Douglas Dillon were appointed to be American ambassadors in London."
If we forget about the other groups, the description of the U.S. and U.K. Round Table Groups as submerged nucleuses of respectively the CFR and the RIIA is the perfect description of the Pilgrims Society. Also, the only name of a person in the quote above, that is not represented in my incomplete Pilgrims members list, is Lionel Curtis. All the other names are confirmed Pilgrims. And what is said here about the large number of Morgan representatives is something I also immediately noticed when I was filling in all the biographies. Even though Rockefeller interests, especially in later times, were just as dominant, the history of the Morgan family really shows their ties to England through
George Peabody and Junius S. Morgan. At the turn of the century, the Morgans wielded enormous power over the United States economy [1].
Besides the organizations I put in the table above, you will also find that institutions like the Atlantic Institute for International Affairs, Bilderberg, the Bohemian Grove, the Trilateral Commission, the Brookings Institution, the Ford Foundation, the Ditchley Foundations, the Fabian Society, the Japan Society, the Asia Society, the American-Australian Association, and some others, are quite frequently represented. I didn't specifically look for these institutions though, simply because it takes me too much time. Often, these institutes aren't mentioned in the bios of the person you're researching.
The reason that you find quite a few Skull & Bones members (or members who have family in Skull & bones) in the Pilgrims Society is probably because Yale is a prestigious University and a first choice for many law and MBA students. It's also located close to New York. Don't kid yourself however, 20 year old boys don't rule anything. You'll also find at least 5 Scroll & Key members and many more Yale students who haven't been into any society. But as far as I can see, the Pilgrims Society is open to anyone who learns enough, works enough, and winds up in the right place for a Pilgrims invitation. Harvard and Columbia are other common universities where Pilgrims have studied.
1906 - Pilgrims are involved in the secret Algeciras Conference to settle a dispute among the British, Germans, and French about the division of Morocco.
1913 - The earlier mentioned establishment of the Federal Reserve and of course the 1910 Jekyll Island meeting that preceded it.
1917 - Some Pilgrims are said to have been financing the Communist revolution of 1917. Most is known about the partners of Kuhn, Loeb & Co.; Pilgrims Jacob Schiff, Paul Warburg and Otto Kahn.
1919 - Many Pilgrims played an important role in the Versailles peace conferences following WWI. In all the history books I've seen, only the discussions of the 'big three', Woodrow Wilson, Lloyd George and Georges Clemenceau, are emphasized. I'm still looking for all the names involved, but I've already seen quite a few Pilgrims and suspected Pilgrims. In any case, Robert Cecil, chairman of the Supreme Economic Council of the Versailles Peace Treaty was a member. In the same year, he was the chairman of the committee that established the Royal Institute of International Affairs.
1924 - After the German economy was completely taken apart and they couldn't pay their imposed debts anymore, the Reparations Commission Committee of Experts was set up. President Coolidge appointed Pilgrim Charles G. Dawes as chairman. The committee comes up with the so called 'Dawes-plan'.
1927 - It is said that Pilgrim Benjamin Strong (head FED) and Pilgrim Montagu Norman (head Bank of England) had at least one secret meeting in July of this year with their friend Hjalmar Schacht of the German Reichsbank.
1930 - The Young plan, which is named after committee chairman and Pilgrim Owen D. Young, is introduced as a follow up of the Pilgrims concocted Dawes plan, because Germany still can't pay their debts. Hjalmar Schacht doesn't agree with the reparations and quits as the head of the German Reichsbank. The same year Schacht becomes a Fascist, starts bringing all the German industrialists together and becomes the most crucial person for bringing Hitler to power in 1933.
1933 and on - J.P. Morgan and Rockefeller associates are financing Nazi germany. Pilgrims Watson and Watson Jr. of IBM are involved. Pilgrims Douglas Dillon Sr. and Jr. are involved. Pilgrim Averell Harriman is involved. Ford was involved, and looking at the prominent presence of the Ford Foundation in the Pilgrims Society, he probably was a member too.
1934 - Because general Smedley Butler exposes the planned coup, FDR is not overthrown and replaced by a fascist government. The persons financing various fascist elements turn out to be the Pilgrims Morgan Jr., the du Ponts, Louis S. Cates through Phelps-Dodge company, and undoubtedly many other, but unconfirmed, Pilgrims. As for Phelps-Dodge, the Rockefellers had married into that fortune in 1907 through a marriage between Geraldine Rockefeller, daughter of William Rockefeller, and Marcellus Hartley Dodge.
1945 - Nazis, Knights of Malta (SMOM), and elements in the OSS create the so called 'Vatican rat lines', through which thousands of Nazis are smuggled into Spain, South-Africa, and South-America. Pilgrim and SMOM member Allen Dulles played a large role in this project. He also plays a crucial role in releasing and recruiting Nazi intelligence chief Reinhard Gehlen (Le Cercle) so this person can establish the Gehlen Organization. This Gehlen Org becomes the eyes and ears of the CIA in eastern Europe. Reinhard recruits many serious nazis in his organization.
1946 - Pilgrim Francis Beverly Biddle was one of the four primary judges at the Nuremberg trials representing the United States. I'll bet the British judge (and president) of the trials was a member of the British Pilgrims.
1947 - Pilgrims Society member, five-star general and U.S. Secretary of State George C. Marshall introduces his European Recovery Program (ERP).
around 1948 - Pilgrim John J. McCloy oversees the release of Fritz Thyssen, Hjalmar Schacht, Friedrich Flick and Alfred Krupp. They are the main industrialists who built up the Nazi war machine and are close associates of different Pilgrims Society members.
1949 - Pilgrims member and ambassador Lewis Williams Douglas had a daughter, Sharman Douglas, who, according to a very sure ITV (competitor of the BBC), had a 2-year lesbian affair with Queen Elizabeth II's younger sister, Princess Margaret Windsor. Sharman also married Andrew Hay of the Pilgrims. (Normally I wouldn't dive into tabloid topics, but this is just too funny to pass over)
1951 - General Douglas MacArthur, who has just driven back the North-Koreans, is removed from his command when he doesn't accept the decision from the US government to not attack the Chinese forces. Pilgrims Harry Truman, Dean Acheson and George C. Marshall are his main adversaries on this issue. MacArthur is replaced by Pilgrim Matthew B. Ridgway. Senator McCarthy attacks Truman, Acheson and Marshall for being in the communist camp.
1954 - Some of the earliest invites to the Bilderberg conference are Pilgrims Society members; David Rockefeller, George Ball, and Henry Heinz.
1961 - Howard Hughes, owner of Trans World Airlines, is charging Pilgrim Charles C. Tillinghast, Jr., the president of his company, with conspiring with others to take over the ownership the company.
1963 - Pilgrims John J. McCloy and Allen Dulles are members of the Warren Commission. Gerald Ford, a future honorary Pilgrim, is a third member.
1965-1973 - During the Vietnam war, Pilgrim Henry Kissinger is the chief US negotiator for the communist regimes. At the same time, Kissinger and many of his Pilgrims Society buddies were investing massive amounts of capital into the Soviet Union, even though this country continued to supply about 50% of North-Vietnams military arms. Of course, these were allowed to enter North-Vietnam almost unobstructed, because the US government was afraid for an escalation of the conflict if Haiphong harbor was closed off and bombed into oblivion. Pilgrims Society members controlled at least some of the institutions that had to check the goods that were imported into the USSR.
1973 - Pilgrim Edward W. Simon was chairman of the President's Oil Policy Committee from February to December of 1973 (oil crisis started in October in the midst of the Yom Kippur war). He also was an administrator of the Federal Energy Office since December 1973 and was charged with the responsibility of minimizing the effects of the energy crisis and preventing future crises (decided the oil prices and the distribution). Together with Pilgrim Henry Kissinger he was the most important speaker of the 1974 International Energy Conference. In 1973, Henry Kissinger first informed the Pilgrims about the creation of an "International Energy group", which became the International Energy Agency.
1975 - Pilgrim Nelson Rockefeller heads the U.S. President's Commission on CIA Activities Within the United States. It was created in response to a December 1974 report in The New York Times that the CIA had conducted illegal domestic activities, including experiments on U.S. citizens, during the 1960s. The commission was, among other things, responsible for the investigation and publication of Project MKULTRA, a CIA mind control study.
1977 - Pilgrims Society member Edmund de Rothschild attends the 1st World Wilderness Conference. At the 4th conference Maurice Strong will inform everyone that Edmund was the founder of the environmental movement and climate debates everyone has become so accustomed to.
1992 - Pilgrim Lord Bingham of Cornhill heads an inquiry into the Bank of England to find out their responsibility in the BCCI drug laundering scandal. Turns out the Bank of England was just a bit lazy, but didn't do anything on purpose. The persons that owned the BCCI were 1001 Club member like Agha Hasan Abedi and Salem Bin Laden. Kalid bin Mahfouz was another one. Lord Bingham became a member of the very elite Order of Garter in 2005. Some other persons involved with the BCCI scandal were members of the secret international intelligence group Le Cercle.
2001 - Henry Kissinger, who was picked as the first chairman of the 9/11 Commission, was a Pilgrim, not to mention one of the pioneers of psychological warfare in the aftermath of WWII; all in all, a great asset to have on a truth commission. The old vice-chairman of the 9/11 Commission, George John Mitchell, became a director of the CFR in 1995, so chances are very substantial he's a Pilgrim too. The new chairman, Thomas H. Kean, is from a very prominent New Jersey family and has been a chairman of the Carnegie Foundation, so don't be surprised if it turns out that he also attends Pilgrims dinners (or 1001 Club meetings in his case).
2002 - In December of this year, Pilgrims Society member Lord Guthrie, former chief of the Defense Staff and out of office by then, is send to Turkey to discuss a possible invasion of Iraq via Turkey. He becomes an apologist for the Bush and Blair administrations, and warns the public for biological and nuclear attacks by terrorists. According to him, Syria is one of the largest supporters of terrorism. But who else is Lord Guthrie? He's a member of the Knights of Malta, a patron of the Cardinal Hume centre, a director of N.M. Rothschild & Sons, and represents the latter to the Trilateral Commission since 2002. In the past, Guthrie has been appointed Gold Stick to the Queen and Freeman of the City of London. He was also appointed Aide-de-Camp General to the Queen in 1993.
2004 - Pilgrims Society member Lord Peter Inge is part of a five-member panel that looks into the gathered intelligence that was used to justify an invasion in Iraq the year before. All 5 are Privy Councillors and just as the panel's chairman, Lord Inge is a knight of the Order of the Garter.
It is obvious that the Pilgrims Society has a very interesting history and that its membership consists of very influential people. Above all, it seems that the Pilgrims Society represents that old dream of Cecil Rhodes to create a worldwide English-speaking free-trade zone (his exact words), with the dominant position for the Anglo-Saxon race.
Rhodes had also been speculating about a network of secret societies that had to absorb the wealth of the world. In fact, the enormous fortune he left behind was probably used to set up the Pilgrims Society just 4 months after he died. But especially these days, 'free-trade' policies seem to be nothing more than a tool by which western companies wrestle control of foreign markets. This makes it hard to say if their ultimate goal of 'global peace' really is that noble.
In the course the 20th century, especially after WWII, many organizations with similar objectives have sprung up worldwide. Among them are Bilderberg, the Trilateral Commission, the British Invisibles, the European Round Table, the Group of thirty, the European Institute, the Trans-Atlantic Business Dialogue, the 1001 Club, the EU-Japan Business Dialogue, the Pacific Basin Economic Council, Le Cercle, the Multinational Chairman's Group, and dozens more.
In every single case, British and American interests are represented more than adequately, at the very least in leadership positions. Even though recent names are in rather short supply it has already become obvious that we can find most, if not all of these leaders back in the Pilgrims Society. This indicates that we are dealing with one of the most important privately funded institutions of the globalist movement.
But, like I already said, let's not exaggerate by saying that we found 'the puppet masters' or something like that. At any time, there are loads of intelligence operations going on most of the well over a 1000 members know nothing about. Also, looking at the bios, it's obvious that there is considerable infighting going on and that different members can't get along with each other at all. So, as for now, I suggest that we focus our energy on gathering as many names as possible. Then the picture will become clear by itself.
A lot of additional information on the Anglo-American establishment and/or the British Empire can be found in the books of professor Carroll Quigley. The articles on Executive Intelligence Review also contain a lot of insightful information.
[1] October 1901, #6, McClure's Magazine, 'J. Pierpont Morgan'
[2] February 05, 1903, Reuters, 'Lord C. Beresford in Washington'
[3] March 3, 1903, The Scotsman, 'Great Britain and the United States - Banquet in London'
[4] June 20, 1903, The Scotsman, 'MP George Wyndham at the Pilgrims Club'
[5] February 20, 1908, New York Times, 'Ambassador Reid - the Pilgrims guest'
[6] April 24, 1910, Associated Press, Mark Twain deceased - Pilgrims visit
[7] February 6, 1913, The Scotsman, King George delivers message at Pilgrims Society
[8] December 24, 1915, The Scotsman, 'Closer Unity of the British Empire'
[9] June 1, 1918, Press Association, 'Hands off the Southern Pacific'
[10] December 22, 1919, The Scotsman, Pilgrims celebrate 299th birthday of original Pilgrims
[11] March 17, 1924, Time Magazine, 'A Summing-Up'
[12] April 21, 1924, Time Magazine, 'The Judgment'
[13] December 2, 1926, The Scotsman, 'Duke of York - Pilgrims God Speed'
[14] May 4, 1928, The Scotsman, Nicholas Butler becomes the new president of the U.S. club
[15] July 6, 1931, Time Magazine, '30 Years of Picasso'
[16] October 26, 1939, The Scotsman, Pilgrims speaker denounces the Nazis as Barbarian Pagans
[17] November 6, 1939, Time Magazine, 'Aims and Rights'
[18] 1940, John Whiteford, 'Sir Uncle Sam, Knight of the British Empire'
[19] January 20, 1941, Time Magazine, 'Churchill & the U.S.'
[20] March 20, 1941, The Scotsman, Nazis denounce Churchill's Pilgrims speech and the Anglo-Saxons
[21] December 3, 1942, The Scotsman, 'New World Order - Path of Equality and Human Brotherhood'
[22] E.C. Knuth, 1946, 'The Empire of the City'
[23] December 13, 1947, The Scotsman, 'Marshall on his Mission'
[24] October 23, 1950, Time Magazine, No Pushing
[25] November 7, 1950, The Scotsman, 'No Slackening after Korea'
[26] Oct. 27, 1952, Time Magazine, 'No Pushing' and July 2, 1956, Time Magazine, 'Give 'Em Hell, Harricum!'
[27] Dec. 8, 1958, Time Magazine, 'The Double Dare'
[28] April 16, 1965, Time Magazine, Ambassador Patrick farewell
[29] 1966, Carroll Quigley, 'Tragedy and Hope - A history of the world in our time'
[30] December 1973, Kissinger addresses the Pilgrims and suggests an "International Energy group"
[31] June 1975, American Opinion, William P. Hoar, 'Henry Kissinger: This Man Is On The Other Side'
[32] January 30, 1981, Reuters, 'Mrs. Thatcher Detects No Sign Of Moscow's Interest in Detente' (excerpt)
[33] 1983 (original from 1952), Eustace Mullins, 'Secrets of the Federal Reserve'
[34] December 10, 1985, New York Times, ' Excerpts From Shultz Remarks on Aid to Rebels' (excerpt)
[35] Official Federal Reserve websites
[36] April 20, 1994, The Times, 'Britain belongs to Europe'
[37] April 20, 1994, The Times, 'US ambassador leaves with rebuke for Euro-sceptics; Raymond Seitz'
[38] November 16, 1994, The Times, 'US tries to forge pact on eastward expansion of Nato'
[39] April 6, 1995, The Times, 'FDR and The Times'
[40] June 30, 1999, MOD, Speech of George Robertson
[41] 2002, Anne Baker Pimlott, 'The Pilgrims of Great Britain - a centennial history'
[42] 2002, Antony Sutton, 'America's Secret Establishment'
[43] Watch.pair.com, 'The Pilgrim Society & The English Speaking Union'
[44] January 31, 2002, nato.int, 'NATO After September 11'
[45] November 28, 2002, U.S. State Department, 'State's Boucher on U.S. Foreign Policy, EU and NATO, Iraq, Freedom'
[46] 2002, University of Dundee, 'Laureation Countess of Strathmore and Kinghorne - Professor Alan Newell'
[47] January 21, 2004, Royal.gov.uk, 'Diary of engagements of the Queen and Duke of Edinburgh...'
[48] February 4, 2004, Times Online, 'Today's royal engagements'
[49] February 12, 2004, The UK Mission to the United Nations, 'Speech to Pilgrims of the United States on "A Multilateral Journey"'
[50] September 16, 2004, Chatham House, internal program list names Robert Worcester as a Pilgrim
[51] September 2004, English Speaking Union, 'Panel Discussion on the US Election'
[52] Charles Savoie, Silver Investor, 2004-2005, 'Meet the World Money Power'-series.
[53] Kansas City Infozine, biography of Robert M. Worcester (again) confirms he is a chairman of the Pilgrims.
[54] Corporate Entertainer Magazine, 'Banking on Hospitality' (article on Rupert Hambro, year unknown)
Author: Joël van der Reijden
Original: May 3, 2005
Last update: October 14, 2006
Version: 1.9
With Tony Blair's inexplicable lie in the House of Commons denying attendance at Bilderberg 1998 in Turnberry and now prevarification in the Lords, New Labour clearly has serious jitters over Bilderberg. Has collaboration with the world's most powerful secret society turned our Prime Minister into a nervous traitor? And if he can wriggle out of being prosecuted under the Treason Act 1351 Blair might watch out unless he's charged under the Honours (Prevention of Abuses) Act 1925. Seems like their lies and conspiracies are finally catching up with New Labour.
Included here too is some fascinating insight into the links between occultists, war planning, and the strange wish of occultic war leaders such as Adolf Hitler... to be God. Finally Alf Mendes briongs us a look at how far up the international financial architecture the money launderers have penetrated.
Having completed the transition over to Google Groups from Yahoo now might be a good time to plug the unique Power Elite Public Information Service to your friends and other E-correspondents.http://groups.google.com/group/pepis
You can post by sending an email here pepis@googlegroups.com
And non-members can join by visiting http://groups.google.com/group/pepis
Tony
1. Government accused of Bilderberg conference cover up
2. Magic and the Fate of Nations - The Black Art Today by Dennis Wheatley
3. Nazi Black Magic and the Anti-Christ Order by George Bruce
4. MONEY-LAUNDERERS TO THE GLOBAL ELITE by Alf Mendes
5. Attorney General Goldsmith Advises CPS on His Fellow Conspirators Case
1. Government accused of cover up over presence of ministers at Bilderberg conference
http://www.ukip.org/ukip_news/gen12.php?t=1&id=2715
The independent Labour Peer, Lord Stoddart of Swindon has accused the Government of a cover-up because of its failure to answer two written questions he has laid down, regarding the attendance of Ministers at the Bilderberg Conference in Ottawa earlier this year.
Lord Stoddart, Chairman of the all-party Campaign for an Independent Britain said: "I simply asked if any of Her Majesty's Ministers had attended the Bilderberg Conference in Ottawa in June this year.
The first answer I received on 24th October gave me a recitation of the rules on ministerial visits and overseas travel, but failed completely to respond to the question I was actually asking. I therefore requested an answer to my original question. All I received on 2nd
November was another, similar, recitation of the rules on when minister's travel expenses would be published, which I didn't ask for and certainly don't need!
"The Government's continued failure to answer a straightforward question, is quite outrageous and can only lead to the suspicion that it is attempting to cover-up the presence of ministers at the Bilderberg Conference. Why else would they be trying so strenuously to avoid giving me a straight answer? I shall certainly be pursuing the matter with the Government during the next session of Parliament".
Lord Stoddart's intervention follows a similar question put to the European Commission by Jeffrey Titford MEP, about the presence of Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes at the Ottawa Conference. The Commission's less than convincing reply was that Ms Kroes was invited 'in her capacity as European Commissioner, but she did not participate on behalf of the Commission'.
Ends
The Bilderberg organisation is widely suspected of being involved in making preparations for world government. It meets in secret and does not produce minutes of its discussion. Participants are usually of an extremely high level in politics, industry, the media and other key sectors.
The full text of Lord Stoddart's latest question and the reply from Lord Bassam of Brighton is as follows:
Official Travel: Bilderberg Conference
Lord Stoddart of Swindon asked Her Majesty's Government:
Further to the Written Answer by the Lord Bassam of Brighton on 24
October (WA 231), whether they will now answer the original Question
asked by the Lord Stoddart of Swindon (HL7569) concerning attendance of
Ministers at the Bilderberg Conference in Ottawa between 8 and 11
June.[HL7949]
Lord Bassam of Brighton:
Details of any Cabinet Ministers attending the conference in an
official capacity will be published in the annual list of Cabinet
Ministers' overseas travel for 2006-07, which will be published as
soon as possible after the end of the financial year. The overall cost
of all ministerial travel during 2006-07 will be published at the same
time. Information on other Ministers' travel is not collected centrally
LORD STODDART
http://www.theyworkforyou.com/peer/lord_stoddart_of_swindon
HANSARD
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199697/ldhansrd/pdvn/lds06/text/61102w0003.htm
2. Magic and the fate of nations - The Black Art Today
http://www.bilderberg.org/skulbone.htm#Magic
Nazi drum with skull and bones symbol
Extracted from:
The Devil and All His Works
Dennis Wheatley
Hutchinson 1971
ISBN 0-09-107770-2
' It has been said that, as a young man, Winston Churchill was a member
of the Illuminati of Adam Weishaupt. In view of his tirelessly
inquiring mind, it would not be very surprising if that were so.'
'Hitler once confided to Rauschnig that he was founding a secret order
at the second stage of which a man-god would be worshipped throughout
the world'
Magic and the fate of nations
...The French and Russian revolutions were among the greatest upheavals
in modern history. During them many million people lost their lives,
and scores of millions more had loved ones killed or were reduced to
beggary. One of Satan's titles is Lord of Misrule. No circumstances
could have better served his purpose.
It has been said that, as a young man, Winston Churchill was a member
of the Illuminati of Adam Weishaupt. In view of his tirelessly
inquiring mind, it would not be very surprising if that were so. But
one is reminded of the saying 'A man who at the age of twenty is not a
Communist has no heart; if he is still a Communist at the age of
thirty, he has no head.'
Of one thing I feel positive. During the war Churchill had no truck
with occultism of any kind. For three years it was my good fortune, as
a member of the Joint Planning Staff of the War. Cabinet and therefore
one of Churchill's staff officers, to work in the fortress basement
under Whitehall, from which the war was directed.
I state this as evidence to my readers that I am no woolly-minded
mystic, but have my feet very firmly planted on the ground. Unlike the
majority of the other Planners, doubtless owing to the fact I was
already a very well known author, I was' privileged to count among my
friends General Lord Ismay, Major Sir Desmond Morton and Commander
'Tommy' Thompson, R.N., who were respectively the Prime Min-ister's
Chief Staff Officer, his Personal Assistant, and his personal
Aide-de-Camp; so were all constantly with him. All three lunched and
dined with me, and I with them, on many occasions. (cannot believe that
I would not have picked up at least a rumour of it from one of them,
had our great war leader owed anything to the Power of Darkness.
There is evidence that Hitler expressed great interest in Satanic
ceremonies, and an American correspondent writes to me that Hitler once
confided to Rauschnig that he was founding a secret order at the second
stage of which a man-god would be worshipped throughout the world - and
presumably Hitler intended to be that man...............
read the rest here... http://www.bilderberg.org/skulbone.htm#Magic
3. Nazi black magic and the anti-christ order
Extracted from:
The Nazis
By George Bruce
Hamlyn 1974
ISBN 0-600-36556-5
Nazi black magic and the anti-christ order
Heinrich Himmler, whose arrest as a traitor Hitler had ordered on 28
April 1945 for negotiating with the Allies, was captured by a British
patrol on 23 May. A few hours later he killed himself with cyanide,
and, dying as Reichsführer-S.S., set his final seal upon the
destruction of the world's most sinister order, which the Third Reich's
military defeat had already inflicted.
Hitler had sown seeds of the deepest hatred between Nazis and
Communists in his teaching and in the cruelty and mass murder he had
launched in Russia. Now it was the turn of the Soviets. Nazism reached
its end in a Berlin turned into a battleground of unparalleled
violence, fire and brutality as the Soviet forces dealt blows of
destruc-tion and revenge. It was as if the Satanic essence of Nazism
shone through the flames and the ruins.
>From 20 November 1945 to 1 October 1946 the Nuremberg International
Tribunal tried 24 members of the Nazi hierarchy as war criminals,
accusing them of crimes 'against Peace, War Crimes and Crimes against
Humanity...' Von Papen, Schacht ,and Hans Fritsche were acquitted.
Twelve were sentenced to death, Bormann in his absence. Goering
poisoned himself shortly before he was due to be executed. Ribbentrop,
Streicher, Keitel, Kaltenbrunner, Frank, Frick, Jodl, Rosenberg,
Sauckel and Seyss-Inquart were hanged. Von Schirach and Speer were
sentenced to 20 years, von Neurath to 15 and Admiral Doenitz to 10
years. Lesser lights, such as obscure S.S. murderers, were tried before
the various Allied Military Tribunals.
Many Nazis thus paid with their lives for the misery and death they
unleashed upon the world in seeking to clamp their creed of hatred and
domination upon its peoples.
Can the mystery of the evil of Nazism be explained? Was there a Satanic
nucleus at the heart of it? One inter-pretation of its nature that
should be mentioned is the link between Nazism and the alleged
attachment to black magic and occultism of Hitler and his inner circle,
in-cluding Goering, Himmler, Goebbels, Ley and, in the early days,
Dietrich Eckart and Professor Karl Haushofer. Hitler, according to what
may seem to many people a far-fetched belief, was the medium through
whom contact was made with supernatural powers of evil. Hermann
Rauschning, who observed Hitler with a cold and analytical eye,
declares that he was a medium, 'possessed by forces outside himself -
almost demoniacal forces'. Rudolf Olden, political editor of the
Berliner Tageblatt in the days of Nazism's rise to power, remarked how
the overwhelming, almost superhuman Niagara of words that poured forth
during Hitler's speeches sometimes reached a climax during which he
literally 'spoke in tongues' and seemed possessed. André
François-Poncet, French Ambassador to Berlin, also referred to this
apparent demoniacal possession.
Hitler's mediumistic powers supposedly provided the link with Satanic
forces which spoke through him and led to the black magic and occult
practices in the inner circle of Nazi leaders.
Rauschning also reports in Hitler Speaks a warning given to Hitler by a
percipient woman in his circle, one of the few who dared to speak
forthrightly to him. 'My Fuhrer, do not touch black magic,' she said.
'As yet both white and black magic are open to you. But once you have
embarked upon black magic it will dominate your destiny. It will hold
you captive. Don't choose the quick and easy successes. 'There lies
before you the power over a realm of pure spirits. Do not allow
yourself to be led away from your true path by earth-bound spirits
which will rob you of creative power.'
Apparently Hitler disregarded the warning and was dominated by the evil
forces, who, bribing him with early successes, forced him along the
path of their own choosing towards an inferno which destroyed him,
split Germany and impoverished Europe and Britain for two decades.
To believe this theory one must suspend rational judge-ment, but are
there not in any case fields of human experi-ence which it cannot
explain? And does not this theory of Hitler being dominated by evil
supernatural forces throw light for the first time on the reason for
Auschwitz, Treb-linka, the deaths of six million Jews, the plan to
murder 33 million of the Slav population of Russia, the readiness to
sacrifice three or four million of Germany's young man-hood in war and,
finally, the long-term aim, reported by Fabian von Schlabendorff, for
the total and permanent destruction of Christianity throughout the
world?
In Ernst Röhm's expressive phrase, the Nazis were out to lift the
world off its hinges, to destroy the power both of the proletariat and
the middle classes and to found a new order of society to accord with
the commands of the demonic voices which spoke through Hitler. 'I will
tell you a secret,' he told Rauschning. 'I am founding an Order... In
my Ordensburgen there will stand as a statue for wor-ship the figure of
the magnificent, self-ordaining God--Man...' Hitler at this point
checked himself with the remark that there were matters of which even
he must not permit himself to speak.
Until more research has been devoted to the issue of Hitler's link with
supernatural forces the subject must remain a closed book. Perhaps we
should content ourselves with the words of General von dem
Bach-Zelewski, at the Nuremberg International Tribunal: 'You will never
know the whole truth.'
4. MONEY-LAUNDERERS TO THE GLOBAL ELITE
http://www.bilderberg.org/nwo.htm#MONEY
by Alf Mendes - 03Nov06 - bilderberg.org
It is an indisputable fact that the collapse of the USSR in 1991 was
the most significant post-WWII event on the world scene (as the
Americans would be the first to admit) - leading, as it did,
inevitably, to the cataclysmic scenario facing us today. It is thus
essential to examine this said event in greater detail if we are to
reach a clearer understanding of the matter - always keeping in mind
that it was but one more step in the stand-off between the capitalist
West and the communist USSR - and that its border with that unstable
nation, Afghanistan, would, understandably, play a crucial role in
subsequent events - given the fact that the Soviet Republics in that
region were of Muslim orientation. This was exacerbated by the
following events preceding the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979:
(a) In Afghanistan, Mohammed Daoud ousted his brother-in-law, King
Zahir Shah, in 1973; (b) In 1978, Mir Akbar Parcham, leader of the
communist-orientated Parcham Party (of Afghanistan), was murdered &
Daoud ordered the arrest of other leading figures of the Parcham Party
- which resulted in the Parcham Party taking over the government in a
coup. Daoud was killed.
As revealed by Zbigniew Brzezinski: "on July 3, 1979, unknown to the
American public and Congress, President Jimmy Carter secretly
authorized $500 million to create an international terrorist movement
that would spread Islamic fundamentalism in Central Asia and
'de-stabilise' the Soviet Union. The CIA called this 'Operation
Cyclone' and in the following years poured $4 billion into setting up
Islamic training schools in Pakistan (Taliban means 'student').
Young zealots were sent to the CIA's spy training camp in Virginia,
where future members of al-Qaeda were taught 'sabotage skills' -
terrorism... In Pakistan, they were directed by British MI6 officers
and trained by the SAS".
Five months later, and well-aware of Ops. Cyclone, in December '79,
the USSR invaded Afghanistan, and after a long and devastating war with
guerrilla opposition forces (the mujahideen) the last of the Soviet
troops left Afghanistan in February1989, their economy and rubles in
tatters. America's role in destabilising the USSR (as noted above)
therefore calls for closer scrutiny, and from the vantage point of
hindsight, the fact that in the aftermath of the collapse of the USSR
the American oil companies (with others) quickly bought their way into
the vast reserves of Russian oil and gas is surely proof enough that
this was one of the crucial aims of America's strategy.
This 'destabilisation' was implemented, primarily, by
money-laundering - an illegal method used by political, military,
intelligence, business, drug cartels, and the Sicilian Mafia - better
known as 'Black Ops.'. Two Americans, Leo Emil Wanta, and the
notorious Marc (Reich) Rich, were the main players in this - but it
must not be forgotten that the Medellin Cartel and the Sicilian Mafia
also played a crucial role in this money-laundering scam.
Leo Emil Wanta had worked at the White House, the National Security
Council, the Central Intelligence Agency and six other government
agencies during his career (which lasted from 1963 until his arrest in
1993), holding numerous jobs: in the DEA, the CIA, and Department of
Defense - many of a secretive nature. And as for the Soviet Union - in
a publicised interview he had stated that, during Reagan's
administration, and working under Bill Casey's Special Operations
Branch, Black Ops. (see above) "he had dealt with both the fusion
bomb and the destabilisation of the ruble" - in conjunction with Kok
Howie Kwong of the Chinese Secret Service!
As evidence of America's enormous influence on the global political
scene, Wanta was acting as Somalian ambassador to Switzerland when he
was arrested by authorities there on July 7, 1993, in Geneva, held for
four months, then extradited to Wisconsin to stand trial for state
taxes of $14,000 owed for the years 1982 and 1988., and sentenced to 22
years in prison, for a crime which he was not guilty of. He had, in
fact, paid the sum noted above twice - under protest! It later
transpired that the Wisconsin revenue agent at the trial had fiddled
Wantas' state tax returns: a print out from the State in December
1995 revealed that the sum he owed was $00.15!
Intriguingly, on September 21st 1996 - and while in prison - he wrote a
letter to Hillary Rodham Clinton, referring to "U.S. President Bill
Clinton's Short Term Notes and IMF Sale of Bullion", reminding her both
of his "de-stabilization of the Soviet Union Rubles (SUR)", and how he
had "prevented the Soviet & Italian Mafiosa from the Soviet Funds in
favour of our U.S. Treasury & Metals Accounts in excess of US$ 150
billion" - closing his letter with the somewhat threatening statement:
"Until my legal release from the un-consitutional/ false incarceration
in Wisconsin--as a diplomat & non-resident--I am legally interested in
the corporate placement of short-term notes & I.M.F. gold bullion/troy
ounce delivery contract. Thank you for your kind assistance in this
timely situation". In plain english: if he was not released, he would
'spill the beans'. On Jan. 10, 1997, Wanta received a reply to this
letter from Erskine Bowles at the White House, as a result of which, on
February 1, 1997, after Bowles had checked with W.H. Agency Relations,
Leo Wanta was released on $90,000 bail. His 'threat' had proven
effective!
Here, it is important to note that at one point "Wanta had bank
accounts at Metishe Bank in Moscow, Avenue Bank on the Champs-Elysee in
Paris, Credito Italiano in Milan, Anker Bank in Geneva, Swiss Bank
Corporation in Geneva, the Algemeine Spaar in Brussels, the
Zentralsparkasse und Kommerzialbank in Vienna, Creditanstalt Bankverein
in Vienna, and--the perennial favorite of money launderers--Citibank in
Milan, New York, and Los Angeles". [6] Furthermore, according to
Wanta's Los Angeles attorney, he and President George Bush Snr. had
"set up the Ameritrust account in the Credit Suisse bank for the
government to use in case it needed to counter terrorists from
overseas".
Inasmuch as banks bear the ultimate responsibility for the movement of
money - including that which is 'laundered'. Their role in this
matter will therefore be looked at more closely below........
continues with references here
http://www.bilderberg.org/nwo.htm#MONEY
5. I won't step aside in cash for peerages case says Goldsmith
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23373397-details/I+won't+step+aside+in+cash+for+peerages+case+says+Goldsmith/article.do
05.11.06 Lord Goldsmith is refusing to step aside
Attorney General Lord Goldsmith is refusing to stand down from advising
the Crown Prosecution Service on whether Tony Blair should face charges
in the cash for peerages inquiry.
The former Labour donor, a close ally of the Prime Minister, is
resisting mounting pressure to show the process is independent by
stepping aside.
Ken MacDonald, the director of public prosecutions, has already
declared that he will take no part in the case because he is a former
legal colleague of Mr Blair's wife Cherie.
Constitutional Affairs Minister Harriet Harman said yesterday she was
'sure' Lord Goldsmith, whose peerage and job both came from Mr Blair,
would do the same.
But his office insisted last night he still expected to be consulted on
whether charging Mr Blair or anyone else was in the public interest.
The focus on the Attorney General came with Downing Street said to be
in a 'blind panic' over the leaking of an email allegedly from Mr
Blair's chief of staff, Jonathan Powell.
According to one report, the email discussed honours and said: 'ML will
not be happy about this.'
That was alleged to be a reference to Lord (Michael) Levy, the Prime
Minister's chief fundraiser, and implies he had a say in the handing
out of honours. Lord Levy, one of those arrested and questioned, has
strongly denied wrongdoing.
Detectives are likely to question Mr Blair under caution in the next
few weeks. Should they uncover any evidence of corruption, Lord
Goldsmith would have the final say on whether prosecutions should be
brought.
Though he has rejected 'in the strongest possible terms' any suggestion
he would be politically motivated, MPs have raised furious objections
to his involvement.
Officers at Scotland Yard are also said to be 'anxious' about it.
Shadow Home Secretary David Davis said yesterday the Attorney General's
position was 'untenable'.
'It would be improper for him to be involved,' Mr Davis said. 'The old
adage that the law must be seen to be done applies here.
'No matter what the integrity of the man, if the Attorney refuses to
give permission for a prosecution no one in the land will believe it is
a judgment made impartially.
'If a judge finds he is presiding over a case involving someone he
knows, he steps aside. If a Cabinet Minister finds he is considering a
planning matter involving his constituency, someone else does it. It's
absolutely necessary for public confidence that Lord Goldsmith does the
same thing.'
Miss Harman told ITV's The Sunday Edition programme it was 'premature'
to ask whether the Attorney General should be involved in a decision
because the police had not yet handed their file to the CPS. But she
added: 'I think you can hould follow Mr MacDonald's example, she
replied: 'Well, I'm sure the Attorney General will if it comes to it.'
Worried MPs point to the way the Attorney General notoriously changed
his legal advice on the Iraq war to say a military invasion was
justified.
The U-turn raised suspicions he had been leant on by Mr Blair,
something he has always denied.
Paradoxically, some senior Labour figures are understood to be nervous
that Lord Goldsmith may be more inclined to give the go-ahead to
charges following the Iraq furore.
He is known to have been bruised by the allegations that he was
'nobbled' by the Prime Minister.
Of the prospect of his agreeing to cash-for-honours charges, one Labour
source said: 'It would be a fairly dramatic means for Lord Goldsmith to
demonstrate his independence from Government, wouldn't it?'
The police investigation was prompted by revelations that a string of
wealthy businessmen had made secret loans to help bankroll Labour's
General Election campaign last year. Four went on to be nominated for
peerages.
Detectives have so far interviewed around 50 potential witnesses and
suspects. A string of Labour and Downing Street officials, as well as
former Tory leader Michael Howard, have been questioned, leaving Mr
Blair as the only key player still to be spoken to.
It is unprecedented for a serving Prime Minister to be questioned over
allegations of corruption, and would be a grave humiliation in the
dying days of his Premiership.
From: Tony Gosling - view profile Date: Sun, Oct 22 2006 9:58 am http://groups.google.com/group/pepis
PEPIS#80 Blair lies again in Commons about Bilderberg attendance
see also www.bilderberg.org/2006.htm#Stoddart
Busy times,
Nick Kollerstrom and I discovered yesterday that Verint, the Israeli security firm responsible for security and surveillance technology on the London Underground both now and during the 7/7 attacks, is being investigated for insider dealing. In a seperate matter one of their ex Chief Executives was on the run and tracked down and has just been arrested in Africa. Nice to know the London Underground is in such safe hands.
Unfortunately www.bilderberg.org is down this weekend. Could that be because I just posted testimony that Blair most definately WAS at Turnberry at the 1998 Bilderberg meeting contrary to his testimony in the Commons last week? I spoke to the member of staff at the Hotel who served him his breakfast and shall be contacting Norman Baker MP tomorrow to give him the simple honest facts that Mr Blair seems unable to. Just as he lied before to a similar question from Christopher Gill MP in 1998 (http://www.bilderberg-mirror.org.uk/bilder.htm#Blair).
Or was it this outstanding article I posted on my new forum (www.bilderberg.org/phpbb2/) from the UK Daily Mail (which now seems to have moved to the left of the Guardian on the Muslim veils issue) about the web closing around the Diana conspirators, proving that there was much going on in Paris that we have never previously been told? Feast your eyes and intellect on this brilliant piece of investigative journalism from Sue Reid at the Mail which is included with the Blair Bilderberg lies story below.
Tony
Blair Quizzed on Bilderberg Denies attending any elite conferences in the House of Commons. Is he lying again?
Steve Watson / Infowars.net | October 20 2006 http://www.infowars.net/articles/October2006/201006Bilderberg.htm
Tony Blair was questioned in the House of Commons yesterday on his involvement with the secretive Bilderberg Group. Liberal Democrat MP, Norman Baker asked Blair to provide a full answer to a previous 12th October question about Bilderberg and whether Mr Blair had had any involvement in Bilderberg Conferences since he became Prime Minister in 1997.
The entry into the House of Commons records is below and can be viewed online here:
Prime Minister Bilderberg Group Norman Baker: To ask the Prime Minister pursuant to the answer of 12 October 2006, Official Report, column 862W, on the Bilderberg Group, if he will provide the information requested in respect of himself since 1997. [95308]
The Prime Minister: I have not attended any such meetings.
Is Blair telling the truth? Certainly he has lied about previous attendances to Bilderberg meetings, most notably the 1993 conference which he attended before he'd even become leader of his own party. One year after his attendance Blair became leader of the Labour party and a rapid rise to power, culminating in his election as Prime Minister in 1997, ensued that baffled many political analysts.
In 1998 an MP asked Blair the same question to which he gave the same answer, that he had never attended a Bilderberg meeting. However, the evidence clearly shows he was there. A number of mainstream media reports, plus the official Bilderberg attendee list, confirm that Blair attended Bilderberg in Athens in 1993. Furthermore, Parliamentary records prove he was there with long term member, and supposed opposition party stalwart Ken Clarke.
Tony Gosling at Bilderberg.org has tirelessly worked to expose the influence that the Bilderberg group has on world events. Here he analyses the incredible rise to power that other Western leaders have experienced after attending Bilderberg meetings.
Norman Baker, the MP who questioned Blair, has recently made waves in British politics by launching into a private, year-long investigation into the death of Dr David Kelly, the scientist who found himself under siege after apparently accusing the government of 'sexing up' the case for war to a BBC journalist.
Kelly, the UK's leading weapons inspector, was found dead under a tree on Harrowdown Hill in Oxfordshire after telling associates and friends that he feared that's what would happen to him. An inquiry set up under Lord Hutton duly reported that Dr Kelly had committed suicide. In a brave attempt to reveal the truth, Norman Baker disputes this conclusion.
Baker has also recently suggested that he sees inconsistencies in the official story of the 9/11 attacks.
This year's Bilderberg Conference was held in Ottawa Canada and was covered in depth by Alex Jones and the Infowars team who went through hell and high water to protest and raise awareness of the event.
Bilderberg has a proven history of acting in a kingmaker capacity, yet they are unelected and unaccountable to anyone. Their directives are driven towards undermining national sovereignty and establishing a world order that benefits their elite interests. Both Bill Clinton and Tony Blair were "groomed" by Bilderberg before becoming President and Prime Minister and the mainstream media reported that Bilderberg selected John Edwards as John Kerry's running mate in 2004.
Further Parliamentary records indicate that the shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer attended the Bilderberg conference this year. This is interesting given that Gordon Brown, a man on the verge of becoming the next Prime Minister, attended the Bilderberg Conference when he was shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer in 1991.
A House of Lords minute entry dated 11th October also indicates that an answer is awaited on whether any ministers attended this year's Bilderberg Conference:
The Lord Stoddart of Swindon-To ask Her Majesty's Government whether any Ministers attended the Bilderberg Conference in Ottawa between 8th and 11th June; if so, whether they attended in a Ministerial or private capacity; whether they made contributions to debates; and, if so, on which subjects. [CO] (HL7569)
It seems that some members of The Houses want to know exactly who is attending Bilderberg meetings and in what capacity.
By SUE REID, Daily Mail Last updated at 10:57am on 17th June 2006
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_arti...Princess Diana
Astonishing claims by new witnesses are being examined by British
detectives investigating Diana's death. They seem incredible. But if
true, they could rock the Royal Family to its foundations.
On the night that Diana, Princess of Wales died, the lights of the
British Embassy - less than a mile from the accident spot in Paris
- blazed until dawn finally broke over the French capital.
Inside the imposing building, diplomats summoned from their sleep by
the British ambassador, Sir Michael Jay, struggled to monitor the
tragedy that was unfolding.
Millions of words have been written about the moment that Diana, with
her Muslim boyfriend Dodi Fayed, smashed into pillar 13 of the Pont
d'Alma road tunnel as they were being driven from the Ritz Hotel in a
black Mercedes at 12.20am on Sunday, August 31, 1997.
Ever since, the precise chronology of the fateful night and the roles
played by the Royal Family and the Government have been accepted almost
without serious challenge.
Yet the Mail can reveal today that new eye-witnesses have emerged in
the past few weeks with explosive testimony which raises profound
questions about the influence of the House of Windsor and the
Establishment over events surrounding the Princess's death.
These fresh accounts include the astonishing claim that the Queen's
most senior and trusted courtier was seen in Paris, at the British
Embassy, half an hour before the crash.
Furthermore, they include a baffling allegation that the RAF crew which
flew Tony Blair from his Sedgefield constituency to London to greet the
Princess's repatriated body had been on continual standby to make the
flight from two days earlier - when Diana was still alive.
During this investigation, the Mail has also received confirmation that
two diplomats working for the secret intelligence service MI6 were
operating at the British Embassy in Paris during the weeks before
Diana's death.
These two senior men - who have both enjoyed glittering careers -
have admitted their intelligence roles to Lord Stevens, the ex-head of
Scotland Yard who is heading the official inquiry into whether there
was any conspiracy to murder the Princess.
In the Paris crash, Dodi was killed outright and the Princess was at
first thought to have survived. Yet despite attempts by surgeons, she
was declared beyond medical help at the Pitie Salpetriere hospital at
4am.
By then, dozens of phone calls had flashed between the British Embassy
and Balmoral Castle, the royal retreat in Scotland where the Queen and
Diana's ex-husband, Prince Charles, were holidaying with Princes
William and Harry, then aged 15 and 12.
The Queen was the first to be told of the accident, at 2am, when she
was woken by her personal page. Still in her dressing gown, she and
Prince Philip anxiously paced the tartan-carpeted corridors throughout
the night.
Alerted immediately, Prince Charles retired to his private sitting room
next to the Queen's dressing room. There, he made calls and answered
those from Paris coming into the castle's switchboard and his mobile
phone.
On the ground floor of the castle, the Queen's deputy private secretary
Sir Robin Janvrin based himself in the equerries' room, where he also
fielded incoming messages.
Most pertinently, Sir Robin was on duty because his superior - the
Queen's private secretary, Sir Robert Fellowes, a plummy-voiced Old
Etonian and Princess Diana's brother-in-law - had taken a weekend's
leave.
Meanwhile, the Prime Minister, who was in his North-East constituency,
is said to have been woken by a call from Sir Michael Jay which had
been forwarded by a secure satellite phone via Downing Street.
At first, he was told the Princess had been involved in an accident and
then, later, of her death. It was then he began working on that
memorable - and apparently impromptu - speech which he delivered
several hours later, describing Diana as the 'People's Princess'.
It was a fitting title and one that the millions mourning Diana
embraced.
Yet just as the outpouring of grief continued in the days after the
crash, so, too, have those nagging doubts - and conspiracy theories
- about Diana's death, which refuse to abate.
As a result, Lord Stevens's team of ten detectives have interviewed
hundreds of people whose lives crossed Diana's own. Prince Charles
has been questioned. Sir Michael Jay, now Permanent Secretary at the
Foreign Office, has been asked to outline his role on the night of the
crash.
In a dramatic development in recent weeks, Sir Robert Fellowes - now
Lord Fellowes - has been asked about his whereabouts during that
tragic weekend.
Significantly, the detectives are also planning to speak to Maud
Morel-Coujard, the French legal official who oversaw the police
operation on the night of the crash. Indeed, she was waiting at the
hospital when Diana was brought there by ambulance just after 2am.
She is in a unique position to know exactly what happened and,
crucially, her evidence may give credence to the allegations about Lord
Fellowes, Mr Blair's flight and the two spies.
Her recollections may also explain the feverish volume of
communications between Paris, London and Scotland that night.
Mme Morel-Coujard is expected to say that some instructions on the
treatment of the dying Princess were issued by Sir Michael Jay, who was
also at the hospital. He was, in turn, receiving his orders via his
mobile from the British Embassy, Balmoral and Downing Street.
Most contentiously, Mme Morel-Coujard will reveal that a decision to
embalm Diana's body two hours before it was flown back to England was
made by 'the British authorities'. (Indeed, French law explicitly bans
the practice if a post-mortem examination is planned. This is because
the preserving chemical formaldehyde corrupts toxicology tests,
including those for pregnancy.)
Her revelations will stoke the controversy over why Diana's body
should have undergone this process prior to such a key forensic
examination, which took place on the Sunday at 8pm at a West London
mortuary.
Was it - as some continue to maintain, despite denials - because
Diana was pregnant with Dodi's baby? And did someone want such an
embarrassing fact kept secret?
Recently, the notion of Diana being pregnant was vehemently discounted
in the Mail on Sunday by Dominic Lawson, the husband of Diana's close
friend Rosa Monckton.
He wrote: "It is in a way obscene that such speculation is the subject
of a public inquiry (by Lord Stevens)."
He explained his wife had spent a week with Diana before her death and
had told Lord Stevens's team that the Princess could not possibly have
been pregnant with Dodi's baby.
He added: "Rosa felt obliged to reveal that, when they said goodbye on
August 20, 1997, Diana's period had started and therefore it was
biologically impossible for her to have been pregnant at the time of
her death."
So what evidence has Lord Stevens's investigation uncovered so far?
During his three-year inquiry - which has cost £2million - he has
let slip little about his findings. But at a book festival last month,
he admitted new witnesses had been found who may provide fresh clues.
He is now writing an interim report (it is expected to be finished by
September) for the Royal coroner, Michael Burgess, who will hold an
inquest next year once Lord Stevens has completed a final analysis that
includes the testimony provided by the new eye-witnesses.
The Mail has learned they include two men with extraordinary tales. The
first, whom we will call Mr X, was based at the British Embassy in
Paris and formerly worked for the Foreign Office in London.
His tantalising evidence emerged only recently through a third party.
If true, it will link the Royal Family to events in Paris on the
weekend of the Princess's death.
Mr X is said to be a middle-aged, English wireless operator at the
embassy.
He came on duty in the early evening of August 30, expecting his night
shift to be routine. From his office in the communications room,
encrypted phone calls and messages were sent from the embassy via UK
listening stations to Downing Street, the heads of Whitehall
departments and, if necessary, senior aides of the Royal Family.
Mr X was proud of his job and is an ardent royalist. However, something
unexpected happened that night which he found deeply troubling. He says
that just before midnight (as Diana was preparing to leave the Ritz
Hotel with Dodi) two well-spoken men burst through the door of the
communications room. Described as "public school", they brusquely
ordered Mr X to leave his post and not to return until told.
Mr X kept silent about this pertinent episode until 2000 because he had
signed the Official Secrets Act.
But then, apparently, he named one of the men to a third party.
Exploding with anger, he explained: "It was that b*****d Fellowes. He
turfed me out of my own office. He was in Paris the night Diana died."
Of course, Mr X may have been mistaken. Well-spoken Englishmen in smart
suits are apt to sound and look very similar. Furthermore, Mr X only
saw the two men for a few minutes. But his story, however incredible,
is being actively investigated by Lord Stevens and his team.
The Mail understands that in an initial conversation with the Diana
squad, Lord Fellowes has said he was enjoying a break at his Norfolk
estate with his wife - Diana's sister, Lady Jane Fellowes. He has
dismissed the claim he was in Paris that weekend or any part of the
night Diana died.
And what of the second new witness, whom we will call Mr Y? He has come
forward with a scenario which, if true, will also shed doubt on the
official version of Diana's death.
The Mail understands that he was interviewed at length by Lord
Stevens's detectives recently. Mr Y was one of the security staff on
duty at Tony Blair's Sedgefield constituency during the weekend that
Diana died.
It was one of the first weekends the Labour Prime Minister had spent
there with his family since his election. When news arrived overnight
that Diana was dead, Mr Blair's weekend, which had been largely free of
public engagements, was thrown into disarray.
After delivering his 'People's Princess' tribute, he returned to London
to receive Diana's body at Northolt airport at 5pm on the Sunday.
The Prime Minister's wife and their three children were put on a
scheduled British Midland flight from Teesside airport at tea-time for
them to return to Downing Street. Normally, the Prime Minister would
have travelled with them.
But instead, he boarded an RAF plane piloted by a crew based in
Scotland which had flown to Teesside. Waiting on the tarmac for Mr
Blair was Mr Y.
Idly chatting to the co-pilot, he was told something very strange.
The co-pilot, according to information now with the Diana squad, asked
him: "What's really going on? We've been on standby in Scotland
since 5pm on Friday waiting to make this flight to Northolt with the
Prime Minister."
Incredibly, and if Mr Y's memory of his conversation with the
co-pilot is correct, it would mean that Diana's death was not only
expected - it was actually planned.
Yet can that really be true? Or is it just another fantastic conspiracy
theory, one of the countless that still surround the Princess's death?
Could Mr Y have perhaps misinterpreted the words of the RAF co-pilot?
Or has his memory played tricks about events which happened almost a
decade ago?
Mr Y's claim is just one of the many mysteries that are now being
unravelled, checked and re-examined by the Diana squad.
Perhaps none of the unanswered questions is more puzzling than the
roles of the two MI6 officers who were based at the British Embassy in
Paris. Both were listed on the embassy's staff list as diplomats. Yet
one had mysteriously only just been posted to the French capital a few
days before the crash.
Their names first came to the attention of the Diana squad two years
ago when a continuous stream of informants - including one of
particular significance because of his position in Britain's special
forces - insisted that the pair were spies who were both implicated
in the Princess's death.
Significantly, in one instance, the Diana squad was passed a nine-line
note on a flimsy piece of paper purporting to come from an insider at
the headquarters of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. It has been
seen by the Mail and names both men.
Then it adds: "If you are brave enough, dig deeper to learn about them.
Both MI6. Both were involved at the highest level in the murder of the
Princess."
The files at the Diana squad headquarters, of course, are stacked high
with such wild allegations from shadowy informants. Many have a habit
of being unprovable or are simply the imaginings of over-fertile minds.
However, the Mail has learned that both these men, in their mid-40s,
have been interviewed by officers about their movements on the weekend
the Princess died. They were given permission to speak about their
roles for the first time by the head of MI6, John Scarlett.
The men have produced tickets and documents dating from 1997 which
prove they were not in Paris that weekend. One was in the South of
France with his wife and in-laws. The other was taking a short trip to
Greece.
Both have told Lord Stevens they only returned to the British Embassy,
overlooking the eternally fashionable Rue du Faubourg St Honore near
the Champs Elysees, after Diana's body had left French soil for
England.
That answer may not surprise Lord Stevens. But equally, it won't stop
him looking into the matter further. From the start of his inquiry, he
promised that his team would "go wherever the evidence takes us" in the
quest for the truth about Diana's death.
And, if necessary, that includes the powerful inner sanctums of the
British Establishment.
Email updates to me
Only 1 message in topic - view as tree - edit manager options
From: Tony Gosling - view profile
Date: Thurs, Oct 19 2006 5:04 pm
Not yet rated
show options
1. Can West Stop US Blitzkrieg of Iran? (four articles)
2. PODCASTING AND BLOGGING ROUND THE CENSORSHIP
3. UK Far Right Terror Raid Doesn't Make Headlines - Despite 'biggest'
chemical haul
Hi All,
Good old Mr Webster Tarpley (www.tarpley.net and www.waronfreedom.org)
and others appear to have successfully tracked down the real
purpetrators of the 911 attacks at last, within US Special Forces
perversely operating under the code-name of an annual anti-terror
exercise called Able Danger/Able Warrior. This research and much much
more is contained in the latest edition of Tarpley's book '911
Synthetic Terror, made in USA'.
It's looking increasingly likely that what happened on that fateful day
in 2001 is that a anti-terrorist exercise suddenly turned into a live
attack under the watch of Special Forces Commander at the time General
Peter Schoomacher who's now been promoted to US Army Chief of Staff.
As the net of evidence closes around the General and it looks
increasingly likely that he will be questioned over his failure to
defend the US on September 11th 2001 it seems he's convinced that the
only way out of this is to go for war, war and more war in a frenzied
attempt to distract attention from his alleged crimes. After all he may
prefer the deaths of thousands, even millions of innocent people to his
own arrest, trial and all the embarassment that would entail.
Chinese military and financial clout may be one of the only global
elements with enough weight to stop the Iran attack. Could this be
related to Henry Kissinger's present trip to court China's favour?
http://www.bilderberg.org/nwo.htm#how
As a small answer to this monstrous scenario I have drawn up my own
analysis of the best way to stop rogue elements within our own military
and financial establishment from scapegoating Muslims and anyone else
in their false-flag attacks such as 911 and 7/7 which you can read,
copy, circulate and comment on here
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=4631
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/10/352658.html
If you haven't seen it I am now selling the 2 hour DVD lecture by
Webster Tarpley on this very subject and the history of false flag
attacks (see details at www.bilderberg.org/videos.htm).
God only knows how he manages to make such a doom-laden subject so
amusing ;-)
A period of quiet, prayer, meditation and fellowship with others who
understand the enormity of the disaster that would follow a US/Israeli
attack on Iran might be appropriate right now.
Tony
1. Can West Stop US Blitzkrieg of Iran? (four articles)
Lebanon- Foreplay for the rape of Iran
08Oct06 6:15:00 PM GMT
http://www.aljazeera.com/me.asp?service_ID=11968
Both the Republican and the Democratic Party support attacks on Iran
By: Dick Mazess
There is simply no question in the international press: the attacks on
Lebanon by the Israeli armed forces constitute war crimes comparable or
worse than those perpetrated by Nazi Germany on defenseless civilians
(ex Belgium) in WWII. Amnesty International has documented the
deliberate destruction of civilian infrastructure, as well as attacks
on civilians, and called for a war crimes investigation.
While Europeans are appalled, the Arab street is celebrating what they
see as a successful military effort by Hezbollah against one of the
world's best equipped and trained armies, essentially a division of the
U.S. armed forces but with far superior soldiers than ours. About
100-150 Hezbollah fighters were killed in the Israeli war on Lebanon,
similar to the number of dead Israeli soldiers (officially 118 killed
by enemy fire). The big difference is that 1200 Lebanese civilians
were killed by Israeli shells and bombs, while only 30 or so Israeli
civilians were killed by Hezbollah rockets. Hezbollah basically held
Israel to a standoff despite the massive destruction of civilian
infrastructure (bridges, hospitals, gas stations, factories,
warehouses, apartment houses), the massacre of civilians, including
those escaping from the south, and the creation of an ecological
disaster......
Voting against nuclear war with Iran
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_jorge_hi_061018_voting__again...
A US attack on Iran will lead to the US use of nuclear weapons and will
be disastrous for America. It is the path that Bush, Cheney and
Rumsfeld, with the advice of Kissinger, are hell-bent on pursuing. A
military takeover of government is not likely, and military refusal to
carry out immoral orders is uncertain at best. Congress has a role to
play, perhaps the most important one in its history, and a Republican
Congress is likely to rubberstamp any White House plan on Iran. Voting
Republican in November is voting to wage nuclear war.
A loaves & fishes/Holy Ghost victory for the GOP in November?
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_josh_mit_061018_a_loaves__26_...
18Oct06
The polls all point to a Democratic sweep in November. The news pours
in about pedophile Republicans and Team Bush contempt for their
fundamentalist bedmates. Iraq implodes. Deficits soar. Katrina lingers.
Scandal is everywhere.
On the other hand, there are rumors of an "October Surprise." An attack
on Iran. A new terror incident. Osama finally captured.
Gas prices are down, the stock market up.
None of it dampens the Democrats' euphoria. They think they are about
to win. In conventional terms, they should.
But think again. Please.............................
The Buildup of US air and sea forces
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=NAZ20...
01October 2006
We bring to the attention of our readers, this carefully documented
review of the ongoing naval build-up and deployment of coalition forces
in the Middle East.
The article examines the geopolitics behind this military deployment
and its relationship to "the Battle for Oil".
The structure of military alliances is crucial to an understanding of
these war preparations.
The naval deployment is taking place in two distinct theaters: the
Persian Gulf and the Eastern Mediterranean.
Both Israel and NATO are slated to play a major role in the US-led war.
The militarization of the Eastern Mediterranean is broadly under the
jurisdiction of NATO in liaison with Israel. Directed against Syria, it
is conducted under the façade of a UN peace-keeping mission pursuant
to UN Security Council Resolution 1701. In this context, the war on
Lebanon must be viewed as a stage of a the broader US sponsored
military road-map.
The naval armada in the Persian Gulf is largely under US command, with
the participation of Canada.
2. PODCASTING AND BLOGGING ROUND THE CENSORSHIP PART 1
Wednesday, October 18, 2006
Episode 19 - Those Who Face Death
http://documentally.blogspot.com/2006/10/episode-19-those-who-face-de...
I am having a play at making a video podcast..
Last year I took a trip with a friend, to one country sliding into
civil war and another that isn't allowed to exist.
We crossed into Iraq from Turkey, over the internationally recognised
border, moving from the fringes of Europe to the Middle East. But
southern Turkey is a Kurdish area, and so is northern Iraq. Ask any
Kurd and they'll say you've been in the same country all along;
Kurdistan.....
PODCASTING AND BLOGGING ROUND THE CENSORSHIP PART 2
Tuesday, October 10, 2006
Episode 18 - Vox Pop
http://documentally.blogspot.com/2006/10/episode-18-vox-pop.html
'The Voice of the people'.
Having been given a selection of questions from my US listeners, I
tried to find a small cross section of the UK population to answer them
as honestly as possible.
Some of the answers I got back surprised me. Not because of the
opinions but because of who actually harboured these opinions.. I would
like to stress that the answers I got back do not necessarily reflect
the opinion of myself or this podcast although some of the opinions are
pretty close to the mark.
Also, please do not confuse these answers here with the voice of the
majority of British public. I had wanted to ask for contributions from
more people but in the end had to settle for five as I wanted to keep
the podcast at around an hour in length.
3. UK Far Right Terror Raid Doesn't Make Headlines - Despite 'biggest'
chemical haul
2006-10-18
http://www.unobserver.com/layout5.php?id=2706&blz=1
Here's a police seizure of weapons that wasn't splashed all over the
front pages.
A British National Party election candidate has been accused of
possessing the largest amount of chemical explosives of its type ever
found in the country. That's right, the largest ever - imagine if
he'd been an Asian man. Home secretary John Reid would have held a
special press conference and it would have led every news bulletin.
http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/article.php?article_id=9882
ALSO AT:
White terrorists- Never the focus of Western media
http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-bin/review/article_full_story.asp?servic...
Rocket launcher 'found at dentist's house'
http://www.nwemail.co.uk/news/viewarticle.aspx?id=420965
Failure To Report BNP Weapons Cache
http://www.mpacuk.org/content/view/2823/34/
Conspiracy of Silence? AKA Suppose they started a race war and nobody
noticed... http://www.ministryoftruth.org.uk/2006/10/06/
RELATED:
Far right targets NUJ members
http://www.journalism.co.uk/news/story1072.shtml
Union pushes for closure of far-right site
http://www.journalism.co.uk/news/story1072.shtml
as seen at
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=4631 and
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/10/352658.html
Webster Tarpley's revelations about 'Able Danger' the terrorist exercise team on 911 organised by US special forces, mean that we are beginning to identify the true planners, inside the US military, of the 911 attacks. Yet these facts are being deliberately kept from the European public by a Western media who apparently refuse to listen.
So how can those of us who understand that 'False Flag' 911 type attacks have been going on for many years' work to change that?
With the reporting of 21st Century terrorism the British press has let the public down catastrophically. It is as if Allan Francovich's three Timewatch 'Gladio' documentaries of 1992, showing far-right NATO Special Forces gunning down and blowing up hundreds of innocent European civilians, had never been made.
Through systematic bias and a criminally complicit government the BBC, which the public is legally forced to fund, has turned on us and become an accessory to the crime. Despite the wealth of evidence to the contrary, the corporation's misleading and partial coverage is that of the discredited Metropolitan Police and MI5 anonymous 'narrative' line of unproven but 'obvious' Islamic guilt. After London's most devastating attack since the blitz, Londoners are told there will be no enquiry and to: 'trust us, they're suicide bombers'.
The Corporation crossed a lethal professional line when it decided to refer to the four 7/7 suspects as 'suicide bombers'. By rubber stamping Muslim guilt here in the UK, ignoring Peter Power/Visor Consultants' parallel exercise; the Netenyahu/Scotland Yard warning and other hard facts, the corporation has taken on a leading role in an anti-Muslim pogrom. BBC actions now fly in the face of its motto carved on Broadcasting House, 'Nation Shall Speak Peace Unto Nation', as its one-sided presentation of the facts of modern terrorism assumes a NeoCon/Zionist case for a religious war against Islam and for Islamic oil.
The fact that such an extraordinary proportion of the corporation, and other mainstream media's senior staff, are Jewish begins to look less a result of 'fears of another Jewish holocaust' or 'individual merit' and more a Pro-Israeli, anti-Arab bias which has urgently to be corrected.
A professional journalistic blunder is committed with almost every new story of a 'suicide bomber'. Whether a bomb explodes accidentally, by remote control or if a 'bomber' believes he has a shipment of cocaine in his bag he's still likely to be termed a 'suicide bomber' in the news. In April 2004 Bush's Iraq chief Paul Bremer initiated the Iraqi insurgency by closing down the Al Sadr newspaper. The reason? The editor had printed a front page lead story that a 'suicide bomb' in a bus queue was, according to eyewitnesses, actually a missile fired from a helicopter. The newspaper was closed down by the US Army the next day.
The simple lie, referring to a 'suicide bomber' on the say-so of military 'contacts' with little or no evidence, is a propaganda narrative of which Josef Goebbels himself would be proud. It sends out a clear message demonising the target racial or religious group as 'insane', dangerous and impossible to reason with. Condemned with no proof, no court case the lie of the 'suicide-bomber' is not only bad journalism, it seeds genuine terrorism. When a racial or religious group, after false flag attacks, becomes demonised and targeted by racists it begins to fight back and give rise to real terrorism.
False flag or domestic state terrorism is proving a horrific but successful tool both to persuade MP's to wage war, and cow populations into accepting a stripping away of civil liberties. The horror 'serves well' to dissuade almost everyone, including police and investigative journalists from addressing the truth and pursuing the true criminals. The aversion to believing states can kill their own people means that everybody wants to believe 'official lies' but what sort of world does that leave for our children?
Horrific unprovoked massacres at Supermarkets and Railway Stations, no wonder people want to forget them. But we do so at our peril as they explain many oddities with terrorism 'spectaculars' today. 'Gladio' False Flag 'Strategy of Tension' attacks have been going on throughout Europe under the watch of NATO Intelligence's Clandestine Planning Committee (CPC) since the 1960's. It all became public with an Italian Parliamentary Enquiry in 1990 followed by one in Belgium. Make sure your local politicians, soldiers, journalists and police force are aware of Gladio, maybe by giving them a DVD copy of Allan Francovich's BBC Timewatch series.
2nd SS Panzer Korps Oberstgruppenführer Paul Hausser said after the war that NATO was "formed from the international brigades of the SS". Gladio, which was organised by NATO, is alleged by Belgian journalist Rene Haquin to be "a secret army on the model of the SS". Hundreds of innocent people have been killed in false flag terrorist attacks, particularly in Belgium and Italy, where Prime Minister Aldo Moro was kidnapped then assassinated for inviting Communists to join the Italian Government. These attacks were blamed on leftist groups such as Baader Meinhof, Red Brigades etc. which came out of the 1968 student uprisings. So be on your guard, the rogue network looks increasingly to be an 'ODESSA' organisation and there is no reason to think the 7/7 attack on London will be their last.
Be vigilant for warning signs such as drills or exercises, 'power failures' or unusual delays including unusual announcements on tube or rail station platforms or other public places. Carry recording equipment, camera and notebook with you at all times and keep contact details of all those you question. Use your right to take pictures of or film anyone who approaches or follows you and do not be afraid of arrest. If the police are either too embarrassed to admit their failures or complicit in false flag terror it is up to us ordinary people to gather evidence and find ways round them if necessary.
Much interesting information comes out in the hours immediately following a false flag attack. Set your radio cassette, computer, and DVD/VHS to record as much output as possible for later use. It is interesting to note that almost all London's Indymedia (IM) reporters were away from town covering the G8 in Gleneagles on the day of the 7/7 attacks. If you find strong evidence that points to a false flag attack, check the source then contact every newsroom you can immediately. If you found the info. on the Internet, save it immediately as a PDF file for later use as much material evidence was published on the net, noticed by the rogue network and removed after legal threats. Remind all publishers that legal threats and/or polite requests to remove 'inaccurate' articles will probably originate with the rogue network.
Choose your favoured method, writing, photography, audio or video and practice until you know you can turn up at the scene of a 'terrorist attack' able to gather evidence by talking to survivors or eyewitnesses or simply taking pictures. Familiarise yourself with how to upload files to IM and remember, if their editors tamper with or hide your material you can make a fuss about it, republish it as many times as you want on IM and there are always other places you can publish too along with the fact that it's been hidden on IM.
Keep a list of newsdesk phone numbers for your favourite news services so you can become a freelance journalist for the day. You can telephone TV news or the papers before publishing your pictures or copy free on the net but don't let them faff you about. If they do, get their name and politely ask to speak to the editor. Remember, if you come across a scoop or take a good photograph you may be able to sell an exclusive for a five-figure sum!
Centuries ago the Egyptian state mislead its people by censoring anything which showed its leaders in a bad light. Today, the battle for public opinion is much more subtle and being fought by a secret 'rogue network' of which researchers, producers and media managers are largely unaware. With tentacles in the secret state, police, the City of London, politics, press etc. the network keeps several steps ahead of the game. It uses the vacuum of information immediately following 'spectacular' false flag terror events to disseminate lies, which soon become myths. The rogue network then acts through its media owners and agents to discredit anyone who comes close to gaining enough exposure to challenge that myth and there is a reluctance amongst production staff to backtrack, a reluctance to admit professional mistakes. The rogue network also like to infiltrate our movement so that they can have pieces 'on both sides of the chessboard'.
0500 909 693, 0207 224 2000, learn these phone in numbers and use them. Phone-ins are the least used and most obvious way by which anyone can simply pick up a phone and present thousands of people with evidence (or just opinion) that 911 was an inside job, or point out misconceptions with any attack. Challenge the assumption that 'suicide bombers' were behind the 7/7 attacks, and remember, millions of people have simply not been posed basic questions like 'where was the US Air force for 1 hr 45 minutes on 911?'
Having worked on these shows I can tell you that some days there is a distinct lack of people calling in and that those producing the programme are only too happy to have someone make a controversial point to get the show going. Some phone-ins are on specific topics and others are an 'anything goes' so try to choose your phone-in sensibly. Particularly if you can move a stale debate on terrorism on by pointing out the lack of evidence that the four so-called 'London bombers' actually did it. A list of eight or ten 'killer questions' to hand might be helpful to have handy while you're on the air, see if you can get them all the questions in!
Mainstream media is moving closer every day to the monolithic multinational model. Safeguards such as guarantees of regional ITV news and locally produced programmes have gone out of the window to benefit shareholders. These are some of the main reasons the media has failed us over 911 and terrorism as a whole.
1. Long time lag as evidence emerges - journalists don't know the facts
2. Journalists' fear - job insecurity is exacerbated by low wages
3. 'Burden of proof' is skewed in favour of government
4. Downing St./NeoCon/Zionist/MI6 (I/OPS) penetration of editorial process - journalists' copy scanned & censored before publication
5. High cost of investigative journalism - pressure of time means journalists don't leave the office
6. Ideological influence of media's financial backers, banks and shareholders
7. Young and/or credulous candidates employed as journalists because they're cheap and don't ask too many questions
8. Reluctance to backtrack - "sorry everyone we got it wrong!"
Behind the scenes journalists discuss at length the reliability of sources and contacts. Whispering campaigns abound which is why it's essential to speak to journalists personally, and build up a list of contacts (see 911 truth PR - below).
Brilliant -Tarpley identifies US Special Forces exercise Able Danger/Able Warrior as at the heart of 911 - drills and exercises that 'turn real' are clearly the preferred MO of Gladio, 911 and 7/7 - see and read - nuff said
If you haven't seen all Daniel Hopsicker's various 911 and related DVD's then do please have a look. His professional experience has taught him to travel to the scene of the myth creation to do primary research which blows that myth apart. For example in Venice, Florida where the 911 'hijackers' supposedly 'learned to fly' Daniel interviews witnesses who pour scorn on the official version of events.
Many of these local witnesses want to explode the myth. The lies they see in the mainstream press coverage can make them puzzled and angry. They often feel a necessity to 'unburden themselves'. You may remember that people who were in key positions as witnesses to 911 'hijacker training' in Venice found that crucial evidence was either 'lost' by the FBI or never gathered in the first place. The same happened in London with at least one witness to the killing of Jean Charles De Menezes at Stockwell contacting the anti-terror 'hotline' only to be told later that his contact details and statement had been 'lost'. This leaves people feeling let down and undervalued by a criminalised or otherwise inadequate law enforcement system and often only too happy to talk on camera.
Through a lot of original hard work and determination Daniel has built up the credibility to get well known public figures to front his productions and shown beyond a shadow of a doubt how much more fruitful the 'inside job' line of enquiry is than the barmy conspiracy theories!
Back in 2004 I came across Simon Aaronowiz's www.911truthradio.com internet radio site. He put together a 14 hour continuous audio loop of mostly telephone interviews with key 'witnesses for the prosecution' for 911 being an inside job, interspersed with music. At the Dialect Radio Co-op in Bristol we were relaying that audio stream off the London Indymedia server at Rackspace when it was famously seized, without explanation, by the FBI.
To build 911 truth radio Simon bought an eight channel audio mixer with clean feed for £150 and a Telebalance unit for about the same price. These are available from Canford Audio, Broadcast Warehouse and other radio equipment stockists. He also used two computers, one to stream the audio using Shoutcast software and the other to play in music and pre-recorded interviews. The end result was streamed at 8-16k bitrate so that it could be heard uninterrupted on a dialup account. It is also possible to have an extra 32-64k bitstream to give broadband listeners an FM rather than AM sound quality. On top of this £350 a relay server costs about £20 a month or you may be able to use Indymedia which is free. Most importantly this unique 14 hour loop of evidence was produced with minimum time and manpower.
Journalists are very busy people but they appreciate being forewarned of significant events and informed of significant stuff they don't know in the immediate aftermath. As a movement we need to absolutely sharpen up and focus attention on our eight killer questions of 911. These are the points and questions which will persuade people to take our cause seriously rather than ridicule it. We hold our movement up to ridicule if we don't insist on discussing 911 on solid ground.
We need a London based team to build on contacts within the mainstream press and independent production companies to get articles placed and documentaries commissioned. This team should have an identifiable logo for all press releases and well trained spokespeople who have the discipline to stick to hard facts and the confidence to think on their feet during a live interview.
There are times when news programmes are much more likely to cover issues we are concerned about. And we must identify and use those windows by following the news and proactively contacting newsdesks with our point of view. "Who is working on the X story, we may have something for them"
Opposing what is probably the best financed and technologically advanced rogue network in history is an intimidating task. Sometimes it can be difficult to see how the ultimate triumph of truth, righteousness and justice will ever materialise.
There are powerful psychological forces at work when challenging an earth-shattering lie like the 911 myth. Adolf Hitler knew this well and used it to his advantage cowing much of the German population and that of occupied nations with his myth of the German 'master race' the scapegoating of the Jews, Gypsies etc. and the ultimate threat of the concentration camp.
The rogue network appears to have, at its core, a Nazi-like 'death cult', possibly linked to the Skull and Bones club at Yale University, that accrues power from spilling innocent human blood and from the knowledge that the more evil it becomes the less anyone will dare to take it on. Put bluntly, the fact that press and public 'don't want to go there' is an essential psychological element in the rogue network's depraved plans.
Spiritual beliefs and an understanding that we are not fighting alone are essential if one is not to give up in the face of apparently overwhelming odds. But the forces of darkness know this and are certain to be preparing their own man-made phoney spiritual solutions. Beware of spiritual paths promising 'hidden knowledge'. Freemasonry, Scientology or Spain's 'Nuevo Acropolis' are examples. Truth is pure and simple stuff, it neither thrives nor is it disseminated in a secretive way. As Carl Jung said: "The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison that alienates the possessor from the community."
The most powerful weapon we have may simply be our own love of righteousness expressed through prayer, meditation and spiritual fellowship.
As well as dismantling the 911 myth with hard evidence it we have a responsibility to point the way, as a sort of 'deep-ecology' 911 truth policy, towards a world where cataclysmic fraud like 911 can never happen again. George Monbiot's The Age of Consent begins to address international politics.
Nationalisation of money, land, water, energy and even the railways would all massively thwart the rogue network's private plan to own our world. We have to show we're clear about what exactly would make the world a better place, however 'impossible' people tell us those reforms are. Humour and ridicule of idiotic puffed-up 'leaders' plays a crucial part in this.
We cannot entirely blame the mainstream press for not dealing with our issues for one central reason: Few people have a good enough grasp of the facts of 911 and 7/7, even fewer are able to 'go public' and articulate those facts with any confidence, therefore nobody but the 911 truth movement can make a case for producing a 911 sceptic documentary. i.e. They don't know what we know!
We assume too easily that the facts which brought us to a 911 sceptic point of view are known about, so when making our case we must bear two things in mind.
1) To aim as much of our material as possible at an audience that believes the official version of events covering all the questions they are likely to have about our evidence and never assuming any audience knowledge other than the official version.
2) We must allow as our spokespeople only those who stick to the territory which we are sure of such as eyewitness accounts of explosions or hijackers inability to fly, not get side-tracked with techno-babble we can't prove such as 'holograms' or 'pods'. This stuff should be for internal discussion, a kind of peer review, only. Anyone who breaks ranks with easily discredited speculative stuff is 'pissing in the pot'.
Daniel Hopsicker - http://www.madcowprod.com
Webster Tarpley - http://www.tarpley.net
Operation Gladio - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Gladio - DVD available from http://www.bilderberg.org/videos.htm
Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom - www.cpbf.org.uk - 0208 521 5932
Monetary reform - The Bromsgrove Group - www.prosperityuk.com - 0141 332 2214
Monetary reform - Green Economics Institute - www.greeneconomics.org.uk - 07990 590463
Sustainable Economics Magazine - www.sustecweb.co.uk
NATO's Secret Armies: Operation GLADIO and Terrorism in Western Europe - Daniele Ganser
Radio Production by Robert McLeish - Focal Press
McNae's Essential Law for Journalists - Butterworths
Media Law for Journalists - Ursula Smartt
The Brotherhood, the secret world of the freemasons - Stephen Knight
Simple and short this email is an urgent request for you to watch and download our film - jointly written with ex-MI5 whistleblower David Shayler - about last July's London bombings
IT IS AVAILABLE HERE FOR BROADBANDERS ONLY
http://www.officialconfusion.com/77/mindthegap/Flash_400on2_64/mindthegap.html
And as the film-makers we request... you copy and show it to your friends and organise screenings.
The film will no doubt