 |
Bilderberg.org
the view from the top of the pyramid of power
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
TonyGosling
Site Admin
Joined: 26 Jul 2006
Posts: 1395
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, UK
|
 Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2022 10:49 pm Post subject: LATEST NEWS GREENNET SERVERS WON'T ALLOW TO POST ON 911FORUM |
 |
|
http://911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=20234
ELIZABETH’S EMPIRE VS. EGYPT
https://egyptianstreets.com/2022/09/15/while-the-west-welcomes-king-charles-egypt-remembers-princess-diana/
While some Egyptians, including President Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi, mourn the passing of Queen Elizabeth, very few mourn the empire she leaves behind, and the colonial cloud that continues to loom over its history.
Egypt became a victim of Great Britain’s colonial ambitions in 1882, occupying the country until 1957 – during Elizabeth’s reign. Egypt and Britain continuously clashed over the years, from independence struggles in 1922 to overthrowing the British-influenced Egyptian monarchy, culminating in the Suez Crisis of 1956.
In November 1956, Egypt’s President Gamal Abdel Nasser nationalized the British-occupied Suez Canal, leading to a tripartite attack from France, Israel, and Britain, with the latter attempting to invade Egypt’s Suez. Britain failed to recapture the Suez Canal, further cementing its collapsing colonial power.
While Elizabeth may have not been the decision-maker behind the invasion – that credit goes to Prime Minister Anthony Eden, who resigned in disgrace afterward – she served as the face of Britain’s colonial pursuits.
“The world today is different. Egypt is much stronger now. Today, the British radio calls me a dog, as they’ve done, I tell them you are sons of dogs,” Nasser proudly retorts in a post-Suez victory speech, later mocking the monarchy and Anthony Eden as well.
Needless to say, the Egyptian outlook on Elizabeth’s Britain was noticeably hostile, and vice versa.
Relations did eventually soften following Anwar Sadat’s ascension to presidency. The country’s reconciling relations with Britain were made evident in August 1981, when Prince Charles crossed through Egypt during his honeymoon cruise with an amiable yet unknown Princess Diana. That trip would mark her connection to the country.
Over the coming years, Diana’s reputation grew from yet another member of a disdained royal family to a beloved icon of the Egyptian (and Arab) world.
THE UNIVERSAL RISE OF DIANA, THE QUEEN OF HEARTS
Diana was only 20 when she married Charles, who was 12 years her senior, yet she quickly won the hearts of the British public – a reputation her own husband was jealous of. It did not take long for the marriage to deteriorate, as the royal couple’s love soured in 1984 shortly after Prince Harry’s birth.
While Elizabeth, and a now-matured Charles, struggled to adapt to a post-imperial Britain, Diana was a champion of multiculturalism and social progress.
The British monarchy had long appeared as a detached and distant image to the common British citizen. Elizabeth’s longstanding reign served as a symbol of stability rather than warmth and love – keep calm and carry on.
Diana, on the other hand, was an adventurous and independent outsider in the eyes of the monarchy, stuck between normality and royalty. The People’s Princess preferred hands-on human and social experiences over castles and seclusion, a decision that further distanced her from the monarchy, and eventually led to a divorce with Charles in 1996.
Image Credit: Negative Colors
Wherever she toured, Diana would embrace and respect cultures in an intimate manner never witnessed before by a British royal: from visiting a cancer hospital in Pakistan, to controversially hugging HIV patients in New York – a moment that helped direct public attitude toward the illness from fear to care.
In Egypt, 1992, over a decade after honeymooning in Hurghada’s Red Sea, Diana returned to experience cultural sites and Egyptian society once more.
Her tour was celebrated by Egyptians, largely in part because of her charitable visits – ranging from visiting a school for blind children to visiting Al-Azhar mosque while wearing a head scarf in respect to Islam’s traditions.
It was beginning to show that while, politically, Elizabeth was Queen of Britain, Diana was the Queen of Hearts, winning over Egypt and its neighboring countries.
DIANA’S DEEPENING CONNECTION TO EGYPT, IN LIFE AND DEATH
Diana’s affinity to Egypt only increased following a highly publicized relationship with Dodi (Emad) Al-Fayed, son of the monarchy-hating billionaire, Mohamed Al-Fayed in 1997.
To Egypt and the Arab world, Diana’s newfound love interest was a moment of celebration. It represented a moment of unity between a progressive and compassionate ex-royalty and an Arab-Muslim man.
To the monarchy, it was a slap in the face to their Anglican and Briton-exclusive establishment – a sentiment confirmed by Meghan Markle, the American actress-turned-royal wife of Prince Harry, when they publicly revealed racism within the royal family and British media in a 2021 interview with Oprah Winfrey.
Unlike Harry and Meghan, Diana and Dodi’s rebellious love affair was short-lived, after a tragic car accident in Paris took both their lives on 31 August 1997 – an event that shook the world for years to come.
Diana was 36 when she passed away, Dodi was 42. The United Kingdom came together to mourn what seemed to be a tragedy. Some Egyptians suspected a potential conspiracy, instead. In one video by the Associated Press in 1997, covering Egypt’s reaction to Diana and Dodi’s deaths, Egyptian booksellers can be seen displaying conspiracy books and magazines about the accident. Passersby can be seen reading its pages with great focus.
Dodi and Diana’s relationship was leaked to the public during their private cruise trip
Image Credit: Daily Star
One Egyptian lawyer, Nabih El Wahsh, went as far as to file a lawsuit in November 1997, a few months after the crash, accusing Queen Elizabeth and Prime Minister Tony Blair of intentionally plotting the car crash. The lawsuit, obviously, was dismissed for lack of evidence.
Mohamed Al-Fayed, in an interview two years after the accident, also expressed his belief that his son’s death was premeditated.
“They still don’t accept that my son, an Egyptian Muslim, can be the step father of the future king,” explained Al-Fayed when asked why he suspects criminal intentions behind the crash during his interview with ‘60 Minutes’.
Despite the accusations, no evidence has surfaced to indicate the possibility of a murder. In 2008, a highly-publicized and long-drawn legal case raised by Al-Fayed ruled that Diana and Dodi’s deaths were the result of incessant paparazzi camera flashes and reckless driving.
The date of 6 September 2022 marked the 25th anniversary of Diana’s funeral – two days before Queen Elizabeth’s passing.
Twenty-five years on, Diana’s ex-husband is finally crowned king, with his long-term partner Camilla Parker as queen consort – a woman Diana nicknamed ‘Rottweiler’. He and his kingdom celebrate this new era in the monarchy, welcomed warmly by world leaders.
Diana’s legacy, however, lives on, as a constant reminder that she represented the only semblance of compassion and love seen by Egyptians and Arabs in what was a historically oppressing empire.
_________________
http://www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
Secret Rulers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0p-e2ng0SI
http://www.thisweek.org.uk
http://www.dialectradio.co.uk
http://www.911forum.org.uk |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TonyGosling
Site Admin
Joined: 26 Jul 2006
Posts: 1395
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, UK
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2022 12:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=24438
ZELENSKY CAUGHT LYING ABOUT IZIUM GRAVESITE.
https://www.facebook.com/1482247977/posts/pfbid0nSUZN9DyAevEsbetQiRamaZQBnAeZJZh8Xv2hzWt3La6A8yyYrAAce39A9ChdvpEl/
President Zelensky never refers to what was said by his own investigator. Serhii Bolvinov, the chief police investigator for the Kiev authorities in the Kharkiv region, actually reported to Britain’s Sky News, regarding the scene of the so-called mass burial site of nameless civilians.
Bolvinov said that the 440 graves are marked with individual crosses, some with identifications, some without. The exhumations so far showed that the victims died from various causes—all associated with victims in a battle. “We know that some were killed [by a bullet], some died because of artillery fire, so-called mine explosion traumas. Some died because of airstrikes.... So the reasons of death will be established during the investigations.”
Bolvinov makes no mention of any evidence of torture. In contrast, Zelenskyy makes no mention of soldiers dying in battle, only speaking of torture and executions.
Izyum was the site of intense fighting a few months ago. A lot more than 440 of Ukraine’s forces died in those battles. That the Russian occupiers actually took the time, at this site, to bury everyone individually and provide crosses and some identification should be the beginning of the story.
_________________
http://www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
Secret Rulers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0p-e2ng0SI
http://www.thisweek.org.uk
http://www.dialectradio.co.uk
http://www.911forum.org.uk |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling
Site Admin
Joined: 26 Jul 2006
Posts: 1395
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, UK
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling
Site Admin
Joined: 26 Jul 2006
Posts: 1395
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, UK
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2022 11:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
http://911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=24355
Study ties COVID booster to startling spike in excess deaths
Posted by ClarkCountyToday.com
Date: Monday, July 18, 2022
in: News, COVID-19
https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/study-ties-covid-booster-to-startling-spike-in-excess-deaths/
A study based on weekly government data in New Zealand – one of the world's most vaccinated nations – found that the age groups most likely to have had COVID booster shots had up to 10% more excess deaths.
Researchers examine data from one of world’s most vaccinated nations
Art Moore
WND News Center
A study based on weekly government data in New Zealand – one of the world’s most vaccinated nations – found that the age groups most likely to have had COVID booster shots had up to 10% more excess deaths.
Excess mortality is the number of deaths from all causes above what would be typically expected in one year.
Authored by John Gibson, an economics professor at the University of Waikato in Hamilton, New Zealand, the study found there were 16 excess deaths per 100,000 booster doses in the country, amounting to more than 400 excess deaths, reported the website The Expose.
Gibson said that if extrapolated, it amounted to 300,000 excess deaths worldwide.
In his paper, “The Rollout of COVID-19 Booster Vaccines is Associated with Rising Excess Mortality in New Zealand,” the economist said the bottom line from his study is that the risks of the COVID vaccines outweigh any benefits.
“The ratio of vaccine risk to benefits likely has swung more towards risk than during the original randomised trials, due to dose-dependent adverse events and to fixation of immune responses on a variant no longer circulating,” he wrote.
The study found that the age groups “most likely to use boosters had 7-10 percentage point rises in excess mortality rates as boosters were rolled out while the age group that is mostly too young for boosters saw no rise in excess mortality.”
The Expose noted that last December, New Zealand’s COVID Response minister, Chris Hipkins, reduced the interval between the second dose and the booster shot from six months to four months. That made 82% of vaccinated New Zealanders eligible for a booster by late February 2022.
A graph from Gibson’s analysis shows a sustained rise in excess mortality coinciding with the booster rollout.
The increase in excess mortality over the past four months, the study found, was experienced by all ages except the 0-29 years group, who were mostly ineligible for boosters.
Gibson concluded the “age groups most likely to use boosters had 7–10 percentage point rises in excess mortality rates as boosters were rolled out while the age group that is mostly too young for boosters saw no rise in excess mortality.”
_________________
http://www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
Secret Rulers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0p-e2ng0SI
http://www.thisweek.org.uk
http://www.dialectradio.co.uk
http://www.911forum.org.uk |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling
Site Admin
Joined: 26 Jul 2006
Posts: 1395
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, UK
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2022 12:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
http://911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=24355
COVID vaccines may be harming our young
September 22, 2022 | 5:48 pm
Being Right
By Jemy Gatdula - SPENCER DAVIS-UNSPLASH
https://www.bworldonline.com/opinion/2022/09/22/476202/covid-vaccines-may-be-harming-our-young/
Significant studies and scientific findings have come out over the past few weeks, all not getting the appropriate airing that we deserve from news media. They have to do with the possible harmful effects of COVID vaccines.
VACCINES MORE HARMFUL THAN COVID
The most significant is a study coming from Oxford, Washington, Toronto, Harvard, and John Hopkins Universities, which looked at 18-29-year olds boosted with an mRNA vaccine. And what they found was this: “Using CDC and sponsor-reported adverse event data, we find that booster mandates may cause a net expected harm: per COVID-19 hospitalization prevented in previously uninfected young adults, we anticipate 18 to 98 serious adverse events, including 1.7 to 3.0 booster-associated myocarditis cases in males, and 1,373 to 3,234 cases of grade ≥3 reactogenicity which interferes with daily activities.”
To put it another way: for those below 30 years old, vaccines are more harmful than COVID by a factor of 18-98%.
The study continues: “Given the high prevalence of post-infection immunity, this risk-benefit profile is even less favorable. University booster mandates are unethical because: 1.) no formal risk-benefit assessment exists for this age group; 2.) vaccine mandates may result in a net expected harm to individual young people; 3.) mandates are not proportionate: expected harms are not outweighed by public health benefits given the modest and transient effectiveness of vaccines against transmission; 4.) US mandates violate the reciprocity principle because rare serious vaccine-related harms will not be reliably compensated due to gaps in current vaccine injury schemes; and 5.) mandates create wider social harms. We consider counter-arguments such as a desire for socialization and safety and show that such arguments lack scientific and/or ethical support.” (“COVID-19 Vaccine Boosters for Young Adults: A Risk-Benefit Assessment and Five Ethical Arguments against Mandates at Universities,” Bardosh, et. Al., September 2022”; https://bit.ly/EthicalArguments)
Take the foregoing with the context that the United States Center for Disease Control reportedly “has provided false information regarding their tracking of adverse events caused by the vaccines.” At the same time, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky “admits that there is a causal relationship between the mRNA vaccines and myocarditis.” Thus, “VAERS staff conducted assessments showing that causal associations exist between thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome and Janssen’s COVID-19 vaccine and between myocarditis and mRNA COVID-19 vaccination.” Furthermore, Walensky also admitted that “the CDC did not analyze certain types of adverse event reports whatsoever in 2021, despite having previously stated that they did start this tracking in February of that year.” (“Vaccine Narrative Collapses as Harvard Study Shows Jab More Dangerous than COVID,” Jonas Vesterberg, The Florida Standard, Sept. 14, 2022, https://bit.ly/VaccineJabs)
Note that the Danish government is recommending against vaccinating people under the age of 50 years, with the justification that those “under 50 are generally not at particularly higher risk of becoming severely ill from COVID-19.” (Danish Health Authority)
THE FLU IS MORE HARMFUL THAN COVID
The foregoing are coming amidst news that the flu is now considered more dangerous than COVID. Thus, as Dr. Monica Gandhi, an infectious disease specialist at the University of California, San Francisco, rhetorically asked: “When does COVID look like influenza?,” her considered response was: “Yes, we are there.” Gandhi and her fellow researchers “argue that most people today have enough immunity — gained from vaccination, infection or both — to protect them against getting seriously ill from COVID. And this is especially so since the omicron variant doesn’t appear to make people as sick as earlier strains.” (“Scientists debate how lethal COVID is. Some say it’s now less risky than flu,” Rob Stein, NPR, Sept. 16, 2022, https://n.pr/3S2EKbS)
YET THE DOH CONTINUES ITS VACCINE PUSH
All that makes the Department of Health’s (DoH) unconditional insistence to vaccinate Filipinos, specially the younger and healthy ones, ludicrously bizarre. The DoH even went to the ridiculous extent of declaring that the COVID-19 pandemic will be considered ended “only if vaccination targets are achieved” (“DoH: End to pandemic only if vax targets met,” Philippine Daily Inquirer, Sept. 17, 2022, https://bit.ly/VaxTarget).
Which is really disconcerting considering that Filipinos under the age of 30 constitute 57% of the population, those under 50 about 90%. There is simply no justification for the government’s fanatical push to unnecessarily vaccinate the young, healthy, working Philippine population, specially without giving any caveat or caution whatsoever as to possible harmful effects, including even perhaps death, when consistent reports and reasonable questions about the vaccine’s efficacy and safety have been raised for quite some time.
VACCINES, THE PREGNANT MOTHER, AND THE UNBORN CHILD
And this is not even to mention the possible harm vaccines may cause to pregnant women and the child inside their womb:
“Sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine in pregnant women cannot be provided at the present time: however, use in women of childbearing potential could be supported provided healthcare professionals are advised to rule out known or suspected pregnancy prior to vaccination. Women who are breastfeeding should also not be vaccinated.” (“Summary of the Public Assessment Report for COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech,” UK Government, Aug. 16, 2022, https://bit.ly/UK-Pfizer)
THE ABUSE OF POWER AND THE RIGHT TO SUE
As this column previously pointed out, it is not true (as was reported in media) that “public officials and employees, contractors, manufacturers, volunteers, and representatives of duly authorized private entities” are free from liability and cannot be sued for actions in relation to the “administration or use of a COVID-19 vaccine.” RA 11525 actually provides that they can be sued and held liable if proven that they acted with “willful misconduct and gross negligence” in using or administering COVID vaccines.
RA 11525 even set aside P500 million as compensation for any person “inoculated through the COVID-19 Vaccination Program” and because of it suffered “severe adverse effects” including “death, permanent disability or hospital confinement.”
This also is reiterated: many of those dogmatically and exclusively pushing for vaccines were the same people that were so tragically wrong on lockdowns and masks, such that loss of livelihood, injury, or even death may have been avoided had they not been so hysterically, willfully, and irresponsibly closed minded against alternative treatments (see, for example, “Regular Use of Ivermectin as Prophylaxis for COVID-19 Led Up to a 92% Reduction in COVID-19 Mortality Rate in a Dose-Response Manner,” Cureus, Aug. 31, 2022, https://bit.ly/Ivermectin-Covid).
Filipinos (or their family members) that suffered serious adverse effects arising from COVID vaccination are strongly encouraged to document their experiences and claim government compensation, or (as provided by law) prosecute and hold accountable those that forced or misled people into taking vaccines.
Jemy Gatdula is a senior fellow of the Philippine Council for Foreign Relations and a Philippine Judicial Academy law lecturer for constitutional philosophy and jurisprudence
www.facebook.com/jigatdula/
Twitter @jemygatdula
_________________
http://www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
Secret Rulers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0p-e2ng0SI
http://www.thisweek.org.uk
http://www.dialectradio.co.uk
http://www.911forum.org.uk |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling
Site Admin
Joined: 26 Jul 2006
Posts: 1395
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, UK
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2022 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
http://911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=24434
The Great Reveal or the boy crying wolf?
September 26, 2022
https://miriaf.co.uk/the-great-reveal-or-the-boy-crying-wolf/
Something we have got all too inured to in conspiraland is a succession of high-profile activists making grand promises and proclamations (ministerial arrests, explosive reveals, "something big coming soon"), thereby whipping up a frenzy of excitement and anticipation.... and then it all fizzling out, falling flat, and coming to nothing.
We've seen the same just this month, with promises of "something big" happening on September 24th, which predictably came and went uneventufully.
However, my own thoughts on this were, "nothing will happen on September 24th, because whenever a specific date is mentioned, nothing ever happens. But there are so many significant themes rapidly gathering pace at the moment, that something extremely noteworthy is certainly going to happen around that time."
You may have heard of the actor John Bowe, a former soap star who recently "awoke" and came over to our side, warning the world about the harms of Covid vaccination. In the last couple of weeks, Bowe has attracted a lot of attention and opprobrium for making yet another "something big coming soon" announcement. He has been pilloried by his followers as just another attention-seeking wannabe, that we've heard it all before, and that if you've got something to say, just say it!
Bowe, however, has remained singularly unruffled by these remarks, and calmly confident that he will be vindicated. He has also Retweeted a comment from Neil Oliver, commenting cryptically, "Deep breath everyone, here we go...".
"He knows...", says John (wink wink, nudge nudge).
Everyone rolled their eyes - yeah right, not this again - but I noted something distinctly different about these remarks (the certainty, the assuredness, the coordination), and thought, "hm, I think something is actually going to happen this time, and we've been intentionally set up by false prophets in the past to roll our eyes and dismiss things like this, to give the quote-unquote 'real thing' maximal, shocking impact when it happens."
You see, it has long since been my contention that revealing the harms of the vaccine has always been part of the plan. That, when enough people have been injected (the total currently stands at nearly 70% of the entire global population, around 5.35 billion people), then carefully selected, trusted, and respected voices will reveal "the truth".
The reason for this is that, in order to instigate The Great Reset, the existing society has to be totally destroyed, and that entails irredeemably annihilating all public faith in existing institutions. We must lose all faith in governments, health care systems, the NHS and the WHO and all other trusted guiding and governing bodies, so we feel utterly furious, enraged, betrayed at every conceivable level, and therefore start screaming out for change - which the social engineers will then dutifully deliver (in the form of the One World Government and so on).
I have thought for many months that the voice selected to deliver this news is Dr. Aseem Malhotra. I have been following him for years and am a big fan of his work on diet, opposing the over-medicalisation of society, and generally holding corrupt pharmaceutical companies to account. He strikes me as a brave and principled man and I'm not necessarily suggesting he is "controlled opposition" - merely that he has been selected by top-level social engineers for this revelatory role, and he may or may not be explicitly aware of that fact - that he is being used for a wider purpose.
Dr, Malhotra has - since the vaccine was implicated in his father's sudden and premature death - been a tireless and outspoken campaigner, raising awareness of the harms of the vaccine, and, as a top Harley Street cardiologist, has a lot of cache. Yet, predictably, the MSM and various regulators have ignored him.
Strangely, though, he has not been de-platformed or de-monetised (he's still on Twitter and his crowdfunding platform is still operational), as so often happens to activists saying what he says - and to voices with far less visibility than he has (he has appeared on television many times, is very well-connected, and has hundreds of thousands of followers on social media). Effectively, far less credible and influential people get shut down for saying what he says (and not as fluently or persuasively), yet he is permitted to continue uncensored.
I have long since thought this is because he is "The One" - the 'change agent' the overlords have selected to destroy the current narrative and provoke the extraordinary game-changing waves of shock, horror, and demands for change that will follow.
Well, lo and behold, today Dr. Malhotra releases an extensive peer-reviewed study he has published showing irrefutably the harms of the Covid vaccines, and he is going to formally present this study at a press conference tomorrow, Tuesday 27th September, to which all the world's media are invited.
"Will there be any coverage from the MSM though?" Someone asked him on Twitter.
"YES." He simply (and very confidently) replied.
This news has now been shared by John Bowe, therefore confirming this was the 'something big' he was referring to, so my prediction is that this press conference heralds the seismic moment The Great Reveal begins, and all MSM sources finally print the truth (or at least an approximation of it) about Covid vaccines.
Note the media been quietly building up to this, by letting us know the current 'booster' has not been tested on any human beings, and that even zealous pro-vaccinator, Paul Offit, has warned against it. This is setting the stage for what is likely to come this week.
So, now, we must be exceptionally vigilant and more discerning and measured with our reactions than ever.
Yes, of course it is wonderful (and long-overdue) if the MSM finally prints the truth and stops any more people being harmed by the injection, and of course I extend my sincere appreciation and thanks to anyone who is instrumental in getting them to do that.
However, as ever, we must take a step back and ask ourselves, "why this, why now?". Whistle-blowers said from day one - whilst the vaccine was still in development - that this concoction was not safe and would result in huge damage and death. Literally thousands of experts all around the world have been saying that since 2020. So why have they all been ignored by the mainstream... until now?
The MSM only prints what it is useful to the ruling classes for the public to know, so the social architects have calculated now is the time to tell the masses the truth about the Covid vaccines, and that, in my opinion, is timed to cause maximum social unrest and chaos.
Note this press conference is happening the same week that mass demonstrations up and down the country are being planned, by probable establishment fronts 'Don't Pay UK', 'Enough is Enough', and related groups, to protest the cost of living crisis.
The public mood is already simmering, angry, and deeply resentful, fomenting with fury that greedy, dishonest politicians have hurled so many into poverty and uncertainty - so just imagine how this tense tinderbox of resentment and rage will really ignite if it also revealed that the world's governments have irreversibly maimed 70% of the global population with dangerous bioweapons (they won't call them that, of course - it will be "cock-up not conspiracy" - but the implications for people's health are the same).
The reeling horror, shock, and utter, incalculable despair will be quite unlike anything we've ever seen, and so we need to be very clear on why this is happening and how we can best respond.
The crucial thing is not to be lulled into a false sense of security, that, "it's all coming out now and everything's going to be alright". As they say, an army is always most vulnerable in a war when they have just won a battle, because the triumph and the joy can temporarily disable defences. So, yes, this is an important battle that in some ways we will win (our cautions will be proved correct), but that certainly doesn't mean we have won the war. This truth about vaccines is being revealed strategically at this time in order to serve a wider purpose, and that wider purpose is unlikely to be one that is in our interests.
Once "the truth" has been revealed, many people who had been agitating for this for so long are going to feel so grateful and relieved, they are at risk of uncritically trusting those who have revealed it, which of course gives these people extraordinary power. Are they going to use this power for good, or are they stage-managed pawns who - once they have your trust - will cynically lead you in the overlords' desired direction?
It really is so true that eternal vigilance is the price of freedom, and we must never uncritically trust others, especially those with great social power and influence on the world stage, and we must always examine their motives, their timings, and what ultimate agenda they might be complicit in installing.
So this is my clarion call to conspiracists everywhere - please do certainly feel victory, vindication, and relief when then truth about injections is revealed - but please also don't let this blind you to the bigger picture (there always is one), and what this annoucement might ultimately be used to engineer.
We also have to be very mindful of the psychological and emotional impact "the truth" will have on the general public at this stage. For those still completely invested in the mainstream narrative, they are going to be so shocked, so horrified, and so deeply distressed, that many will descend into acute psychological crisis. Many of them have been so militant about it, so vicious and dismissive of those who told them they were wrong, that trying to grapple with the reality that they have been so deeply deceived, is going to be inconceivably difficult for them - in many cases, impossible.
I can't quite predict what their reactions will be, and when large groups of people become this unpredictable and this betrayed, combined with a cost of living crisis which is already pushing many towards a "nothing left to lose" mentality... well, the implications are obviously quite concerning, and are very likely to result in violent rioting (which, as I say, the stage is already being set for with demonstrations planned up and down the country on October 1st). This would then give the social engineers the excuse to deploy to the street the UN soldiers they've been quietly deploying in towns and cities around the country for the past several months (presented to the public as "asylum seekers", who just so happen to all be military-aged, super-fit, single men), to cause maximum mayhem, chaos, and destruction.,. because that has always been the end-game: to completely tear down and destroy our current culture, so they can '6uild 6ack 6etter'.
So it does look like this could be a transformative week in many ways, and that Neil Oliver was probably quite right to ssay, "deep breath everyone, here we go..."
(Follow-up to this article: https://miriaf.co.uk/press-conference-analysis-dr-malhotra-calls-for-immediate-suspension-of-covid-vaccines/)
_________________
http://www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
Secret Rulers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0p-e2ng0SI
http://www.thisweek.org.uk
http://www.dialectradio.co.uk
http://www.911forum.org.uk |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling
Site Admin
Joined: 26 Jul 2006
Posts: 1395
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, UK
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling
Site Admin
Joined: 26 Jul 2006
Posts: 1395
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, UK
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2022 12:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=24480
Germany and EU Have Been Handed Over a Declaration of War
Pepe Escobar • September 28, 2022 • 1,600 Words • 231 Comments •
https://www.unz.com/pescobar/germany-and-eu-have-been-handed-over-a-declaration-of-war/
The sabotage of the Nord Stream (NS) and Nord Stream 2 (NS2) pipelines in the Baltic Sea has ominously propelled ‘Disaster Capitalism’ to a whole new, toxic level.
This episode of Hybrid Industrial/Commercial War, in the form of a terror attack against energy infrastructure in international waters signals the absolute collapse of international law, drowned by a “our way or the highway”, “rules-based”, order.
The attack on both pipelines consisted of multiple explosive charges detonated in separate branches close to the Danish island of Bornholm, but in international waters.
That was a sophisticated operation, carried out in stealth in the shallow depth of the Danish straits. That would in principle rule out submarines (ships entering the Baltic are limited to a draught of 15 meters). As for prospective “invisible” vessels, these could only loiter around with permission from Copenhagen – as the waters around Borholm are crammed with sensors, reflecting fear of incursion by Russian submarines.
Swedish seismologists registered two underwater explosions on Monday – one of them estimated at 100 kg of TNT. Yet as much as 700 kg may have been used to blow up three separate pipeline nodes. Such amount could not have possibly been delivered in just one trip by underwater drones currently available in neighboring nations.
The pressure on the pipelines dropped exponentially. The pipes are now filled with seawater.
The pipes on both NS and NS2 can be repaired, of course, but hardly before the arrival of General Winter. The question is whether Gazprom – already focused on several hefty Eurasian customers – would bother, especially considering that Gazprom vessels could be exposed to a possible NATO naval attack in the Baltic.
German officials are already spinning that NS and NS2 can “potentially” be out of commission “forever”. The EU economy and EU citizens badly needed that gas supply. Yet the EUrocracy in Brussels – which rules over nation-states – would not follow, because they have been dictated themselves by the Empire of Chaos, Lies and Plunder. A case can be made that this Euro-oligarchy should one day be tried for treason.
As it stands, a strategic irreversibility is already self-evident; the population of several EU nations will pay a tremendous price and suffer serious consequences derived from this attack, short, medium and long term.
Cui bono?
Swedish Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson admitted that was “a matter of sabotage”. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen admitted “it was not an accident”. Berlin agrees with the Scandinavians.
Now compare it with former Polish Defense Minister (2005-2007) Radek Sikorski, a Russophobe married to rabid US “analyst” Anne Applebaum, who merrily tweeted “Thank you, USA”.
It gets curiouser and curiouser when we know that simultaneously to the sabotage the Baltic Pipe from Norway to Poland was partially opened, a “new gas supply corridor” servicing “the Danish and Polish markets”: actually a minor affair, considering months ago their sponsors were in trouble finding gas, and now it will be even harder, with much higher costs.
NS2 had already been attacked – in the open – all along its construction. Back in February, Polish ships actively tried to prevent the Fortuna pipe-laying vessel from finishing NS2. The pipes were being laid south of – you guessed it – Bornholm.
NATO for its part has been very active on the underwater drones department. The Americans have access to long distance Norwegian underwater drones which can be modified with other designs. Alternatively, professional navy clearance divers could have been employed in the sabotage – even as tidal currents around Bornholm are a serious matter.
The Big Picture reveals the collective West in absolute panic, with Atlanticist “elites” willing to resort to anything – outrageous lies, assassinations, terrorism, sabotage, all out financial war, support to neo-Nazis – to prevent their descent into a geopolitical and geoeconomic abyss.
Disabling NS and NS2 represents the definitive closure of any possibility of a German-Russia deal on gas supplies, with the added benefit of relegating Germany to the lowly status of absolute US vassal.
So that brings us to the key question of which Western intel apparatus designed the sabotage. Prime candidates are of course CIA and MI6 – with Poland set up as the fall guy and Denmark playing a very dodgy part: it’s impossible that Copenhagen was not at least “briefed” on the intel.
Prescient as ever, as early as in April 2021 Russians were asking questions about the military security of Nord Stream.
The crucial vector is that we may be facing the case of a EU/NATO member involved in an act of sabotage against the number one EU/NATO economy. That’s a casus belli. Outside of the appalling mediocrity and cowardice of the current administration in Berlin, it’s clear that the BND – German intel – as well as the German Navy and informed industrialists sooner or later will do the math.
This was far from an isolated attack. On September 22 there was an attempt against Turkish Stream by Kiev saboteurs. The day before, naval drones with English language IDs were found in Crimea, suspected of being part of the plot. Add to it US helicopters overflying the future sabotage nodes weeks ago; a UK “research” vessel loitering in Danish waters since mid-September; and NATO tweeting about the testing of “new unmanned systems at sea” on the same day of the sabotage.
Show me the (gas) money
The Danish Minister of Defense met urgently with NATO’s Secretary General this Wednesday. After all the explosions happened very close to Denmark’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ). That may be qualified as crude kabuki at best; exactly on the same day, the European Commission (EC), NATO’s de facto political office, advanced its trademark obsession: more sanctions against Russia, including the certified-to-fail cap on oil prices.
Meanwhile, EU energy giants are bound to lose big time with the sabotage.
The roll call includes the German Wintershall Dea AG and PEG/ E.ON; the Dutch N.V. Nederlandse Gasunie; and the French ENGIE. Then there are those which financed NS2: Wintershall Dea again as well as Uniper; Austrian OMV; ENGIE again; and British-Dutch Shell. Wintershall Dea and ENGIE are both co-owners and creditors. Their fuming shareholders will want serious answers from a serious investigation.
It gets worse: there are no holds barred anymore on the Pipeline Terror front. Russia will be on red alert not only for Turk Stream but also Power of Siberia. Same for the Chinese and their maze of pipelines arriving in Xinjiang.
Whatever the methodology and the actors who were in the loop, this is payback – in advance – for the inevitable collective West defeat in Ukraine. And a crude warning to the Global South that they will do it again. Yet action always breeds reaction: from now on, “funny things” could also happen to US/UK pipelines in international waters.
The EU oligarchy is reaching an advanced process of disintegration at lightning speed. Their window of opportunity to at least attempt a role as a strategically autonomous geopolitical actor is now closed.
These EUROcrats now face a serious predicament. Once it’s clear who are the perpetrators of the sabotage in the Baltic, and once they understand all the life-changing socio-economic consequences for pan-EU citizens, the kabuki will have to stop. Including the already running, uber-ridiculous subplot that Russia blew up its own pipeline when Gazprom could simply have turned off the valves for good.
And once again, it gets worse: Gazprom is threatening to sue the Ukrainian energy company Naftofgaz for unpaid bills. That would lead to the end of Russian gas transiting Ukraine towards the EU.
As if all of that was not serious enough, Germany is contractually obligated to purchase at least 40 billion cubic meters of Russian gas a year until 2030.
Just say no? They can’t: Gazprom is legally entitled to get paid even without shipping gas. That’s the spirit of a long-term contract. And it’s already happening: because of sanctions, Berlin does not get all the gas it needs but still needs to pay.
All the devils are here
Now it’s painfully clear the imperial velvet gloves are off when it comes to the vassals. EU independence: verboten. Cooperation with China: verboten. Independent trade connectivity with Asia: verboten. The only place for the EU is to be economically subjugated to the US: a tawdry remix of 1945-1955. With a perverse neoliberal twist: we will own your industrial capacity, and you will have nothing.
The sabotage of NS and NS2 is inbuilt in the imperial wet dream of breaking up the Eurasian land mass into a thousand pieces to prevent a trans-Eurasia consolidation between Germany (representing the EU), Russia and China: $50 trillion in GDP, based on purchasing power parity (PPP) compared to the US’s $20 trillion.
We must go back to Mackinder: control of the Eurasian land mass constitutes control of the world. American elites and their Trojan Horses across Europe will do whatever it takes not to give up their control.
“American elites” in this context encompass the deranged, Straussian neo-con-infested “intel community” and the Big Energy, Big Pharma and Big Finance that pays them and who profits not only from the Deep State’s Forever War approach but also wants to make a killing out of the Davos-concocted Great Reset.
The Raging Twenties started with a murder – of Gen Soleimani. Blowing up pipelines is part of the sequel. There will be a highway to hell all the way to 2030. Yet to borrow from Shakespeare, hell is definitely empty, and all the (Atlanticist) devils are here.
Pepe Escobar is an independent geopolitical analyst and author. His latest book is Raging Twenties. He’s been politically canceled from Facebook and Twitter. Follow him on Telegram.
(Republished from PressTV by permission of author or representative)
https://www.unz.com/page/covid-biowarfare-articles/
_________________
http://www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
Secret Rulers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0p-e2ng0SI
http://www.thisweek.org.uk
http://www.dialectradio.co.uk
http://www.911forum.org.uk |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling
Site Admin
Joined: 26 Jul 2006
Posts: 1395
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, UK
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2022 12:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
New timeline of day the Queen died: How monarch's death certificate reveals she passed away at 3.10pm while William, Edward and Andrew were in the air - but raises fresh questions over when Harry was told about her death
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11263653/New-timeline-day-Queen-died-monarchs-death-certificate-reveals-passed-away-3-10pm.html
The publication of Queen's death certificate paints a new picture of the 24 hours that changed Britain forever
Document disclosed that Her Majesty died from 'old age' on Thursday September 8 at 3.10pm
It confirms that some of the monarch's children and grandchildren tried in vain to be at her bedside
The certificate also raises fresh questions about when Prince Harry was told about her death
By Jack Wright For Mailonline
Published: 19:26, 29 September 2022 | Updated: 00:09, 30 September 2022
The publication of the Queen's death certificate today paints a new picture of the extraordinary 24 hours that changed the monarchy - and Britain's ancient history - forever.
The document released by National Records of Scotland this afternoon disclosed that Her Majesty died from 'old age' on Thursday September 8 at 3.10pm at the Balmoral estate in Aberdeenshire - more than three hours before the world was told of her passing.
Crucially, the certificate confirmed what was suspected on the day - that some of the monarch's children and grandchildren, including the Prince of Wales, Duke of York, Earl and Countess of Wessex and Duke of Sussex, tried in vain to be at the 96-year-old's bedside.
ADVERTISEMENT
It is not known when the King and his Queen Consort arrived at Balmoral, but unlike other members of the royal family they were already in Scotland, at Dumfries House in Ayrshire. The Princess Royal, the Queen's daughter Princess Anne, is named as the 'informant' on the document and would have notified the local registrar of her mother's death.
The document raises fresh questions about when Prince Harry was told about his grandmother's death, having travelled separately from his brother William and uncles Andrew and Edward - who also did not manage to reach Balmoral before Her Majesty's passing - and landing in Aberdeen some 15 minutes after Buckingham Palace announced the death.
Palace aides reacted angrily to claims that Harry had been given just five minutes notice of his grandmother's passing before it was made public, with a spokesman for the King stressing that the public was 'only informed after every family member had been informed'.
The Mail understands that while it is true that Harry was told shortly before the news became public, the reason for this was because he was on a flight to Scotland and therefore not contactable.
The death certificate lists the Queen's full name - Elizabeth Alexander Mary Windsor - occupation, 'Her Majesty the Queen', date of birth April 21, 1926, and her marital status as widowed. The Queen's usual residence is given as Windsor Castle, and her parents King George VI and the Queen Mother are named, with the document signed by Paul Lowe, the Registrar General for Scotland.
Dr Douglas Glass, who had the title Apothecary to the Queen and in 2019 acted as Charles' physician when he made an official visit to Germany, certified the late monarch's cause of death.
The last photo of the Queen before her death, taken on September 6, 2022 in the Drawing Room at Balmoral where she invited Liz Truss to become Prime Minister and form a new Government
The last photo of the Queen before her death, taken on September 6, 2022 in the Drawing Room at Balmoral where she invited Liz Truss to become Prime Minister and form a new Government
The Queen's death certificate says the monarch died of 'old age'. The document, that was signed by Princess Anne as the 'informant', says that she passed away at 3.10pm on Thursday, September 8
The Queen's death certificate says the monarch died of 'old age'. The document, that was signed by Princess Anne as the 'informant', says that she passed away at 3.10pm on Thursday, September 8
RELATED ARTICLES
Previous
1
Next
Queen's death certificate reveals how royals raced in vain...
Sadiq snubs the Queen: No statue of Elizabeth on Trafalgar...
Return of the queue! Hundreds line up AGAIN to pay their...
Mike Tindall says Queen gave approval for her coffin to be...
Revealed: Doctor who signed Queen's death certificate had...
'A statue of the Queen would look better than the succession...
10.30am: Charles boards a helicopter from Dumfries House after receiving a warning from doctors about the Queen's health
Shortly after 10.30am, the Queen's eldest son Charles boards a helicopter from Dumfries House in Ayrshire to the Balmoral estate, after the senior royal received a warning from doctors about Her Majesty's health.
At about 6.02pm the night before, Buckingham Palace announced that the Queen had postponed her virtual Privy Council meeting after being advised by royal doctors to rest.
The proceedings would have seen Prime Minister Liz Truss take her oath as First Lord of the Treasury and new Cabinet ministers would have been sworn into their roles, and also made privy counsellors if not already appointed as one in past.
10.30am: Prince Charles boards a helicopter from Dumfries House to Balmoral
Though the advice did not involve a hospital stay, the announcement instantly raised fresh fears for Her Majesty's health, who had been having mobility issues for several months and had previously cancelled a number of appearances at high-profile public events including the Platinum Jubilee celebrating her 70 years on the throne.
It had been reported that the future King Charles III had been making regular morning visits to see his mother, with the unplanned visits considered highly unusual. She missed the Braemar Gathering highland games, which she usually attended each year.
A Palace spokesman said: 'After a full day yesterday, Her Majesty has this afternoon accepted doctors' advice to rest. This means that the Privy Council meeting that had been due to take place this evening will be rearranged.'
more videos
12.15pm: Prime Minister Liz Truss receives news that the Queen is gravely ill and will pass away 'within hours, not days'
Britain's new Prime Minister Liz Truss was giving a statement in the Commons about her proposed £150billion energy bailout to tackle soaring housing costs fuelled by Putin's war in Ukraine when Cabinet Minister Nadhim Zahawi passed her a note confirming what she already knew - that the Queen was unlikely to survive the day.
The newly anointed Conservative leader had known that the monarch was gravely ill and would pass away in a 'matter of hours, not days' for more than two hours before rising to her feet to address MPs at 11.40am.
As aides located black clothing and cancelled an evening phone call with French President Emmanuel Macron, the PM - who was barely into her second day in Downing Street - was driven the short distance to Parliament, where she gave no hint of the unfolding drama as she announced that the Government would cap household annual energy bills at £2,500 until 2024.
12pm: Prime Minister Liz Truss giving a statement to the Commons on her £150billion energy bailout
12pm: Prime Minister Liz Truss giving a statement to the Commons on her £150billion energy bailout
The Prime Minister turned to look at Mr Zahawi with a look of consternation, while across the aisle Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer appeared to be informed of developments by his deputy Angela Rayner.
Rumours then quickly spread through the chamber and Parliament, forcing Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle to interrupt the speech of SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford during the energy debate to tell MPs: 'I know I speak on behalf of the entire House when I say that we send our best wishes to Her Majesty the Queen and that she and the royal family are in our thoughts and prayers at this moment.'
He added: 'If there is anything else, we will update the House accordingly.'
12.35pm: Buckingham Palace announces that the Queen is under medical supervision
The Palace then issued a statement at 12.35pm on Thursday announcing that the Queen was under medical supervision at Balmoral after doctors became concerned for her health.
A Palace spokesperson said: 'Following further evaluation this morning, the Queen's doctors are concerned for Her Majesty's health and have recommended she remain under medical supervision. The Queen remains comfortable and at Balmoral.'
People gather at Buckingham Palace. At 12.35pm on September 8, they announced the Queen was under medical supervision
People gather at Buckingham Palace. At 12.35pm on September 8, they announced the Queen was under medical supervision
12.39pm: BBC One interrupts its regular programming and Huw Edwards presents live coverage of news of the Queen's health, dressed in black
BBC One suspended its regular programming schedule following the announcement, and instead aired a BBC News Special presented by Huw Edwards - who was dressed in a dark suit, white shirt and black tie, in line with the BBC's dress code for when a member of the Royal Family dies as a mark of respect.
The channel One interrupted Bargain Hunt at 12.39pm to deliver the statement from the Palace which said royal doctors were concerned for health.
12.47pm: Royal households announce Charles and William are travelling to Balmoral
Clarence House announced that Charles and Camilla were travelling to Balmoral - while a minute later Kensington Palace said that Prince William was flying to the Aberdeenshire estate.
The then Duke and Duchess of Cornwall had been staying in Scotland close to Her Majesty.
1.38pm: Royal sources confirm Princess Anne is at Balmoral
At 1.38pm, royal sources confirmed to the Press Association that The Princess Royal was already at Balmoral with Charles.
1.55pm: Spokesperson for Harry and Meghan announce couple are 'travelling to Scotland'
At 1.55pm, a spokesperson for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex confirmed that the couple would be 'travelling to Scotland' - without directly making mention of Balmoral. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex were due to attend the WellChild Awards ceremony in London on Thursday evening, but changed their plans to travel to see the Queen.
2.39pm: Prince William flies from RAF Northolt to Aberdeen airport with Prince Andrew and the Earl and Countess of Wessex
The RAF flight at Northolt carrying William, Andrew, Edward and Sophie to Aberdeen at around 2.30pm
The RAF flight at Northolt carrying William, Andrew, Edward and Sophie to Aberdeen at around 2.30pm
Meanwhile the Queen's grandson William left Windsor and flew from RAF Northolt with Prince Andrew, Prince Edward and his wife Sophie, Countess of Wessex. William's wife Kate remained at Windsor to stay with their children Prince George, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis - who started a new school that week.
The RAF jet had been scheduled to leave at 1.30pm. The reason for the last-minute hold-up is not yet known.
3.10pm: The Queen dies of 'old age'
The Queen died at 3.10pm of 'old age', according to her death certificate released by National Records of Scotland.
The time of death on the document, which gives the monarch's occupation as 'Her Majesty The Queen', reveals that King Charles and his only sister were by their mother's side when she passed away. The informant of Her Majesty's death was the Princess Royal.
3.50pm: RAF flight carrying William, Andrew, Edward and Sophie lands at Aberdeen
The RAF flight carrying William, Andrew, Edward and Sophie landed at Aberdeen airport at around 3.50pm - 40 minutes after the Queen's death. It is not clear when exactly they were told of the passing.
The BBC initially reported that it was carrying up to seven royals and that it may also be carrying the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. However, the Press Association confirmed that the RAF plane that landed in Aberdeen was carrying the Duke of Cambridge, the Duke of York and the Earl and Countess of Wessex - and neither Harry nor Meghan.
The RAF flight carrying William, Andrew, Edward and Sophie lands at Aberdeen airport at around 3.50pm
The RAF flight carrying William, Andrew, Edward and Sophie lands at Aberdeen airport at around 3.50pm
4.14pm: PA news alert says Harry and Meghan are travelling to Balmoral 'separately' from other royals
A news alert by the Press Association said that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex were travelling to Balmoral 'separately' from other royals.
4.30pm: Cabinet Secretary Simon Case tells Liz Truss that the Queen has died
The Prime Minister's official spokesman says Ms Truss was informed of the Queen's death at 4.30pm by Cabinet Secretary Simon Case - who then begins to prepare a statement before a public declaration of the death two hours later, at 6.30pm.
The Prime Minister's aides praised the 'superb' performance of Mr Case, who holds the rare advantage of high-level experience in both the political and royal worlds: before taking up his role as Boris Johnson's most senior civil servant, he worked as Prince William's Private Secretary.
Along with Nick Catasaras, Ms Truss's Principal Private Secretary, and Sir Edward Young, the Private Secretary to the Queen, Mr Case is part of the so-called 'golden triangle' of officials who manage the interface between Whitehall and Buckingham Palace.
4.39pm: Sources confirm that Meghan is not travelling to Balmoral with Harry
At 4.39pm, the Press Association issued another news alert, quoting an unnamed source, saying that Meghan would not travel to Balmoral with Harry. The source said that Harry would be making the trip by himself, and that Meghan could potentially join him in Scotland at a later date, following what PA described as a 'change of plan'.
Then at 4.44pm, Omid Scobie, a journalist 'friendly' towards the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and who often quotes unnamed sources close to the couple, tweeted that Meghan had not flown up to Scotland.
The post said: 'A source has shared an update stating that only Prince Harry has made the trip up to Balmoral. Like the Duchess of Cambridge (who is in Windsor with their three children), the Duchess of Sussex is staying back in England (but still not attending tonight's WellChild Awards).'
The Telegraph claims that this was due to logistics, and that spouses, including the Duchess of Cambridge, were not going to Balmoral.
A source familiar with how the day unfolded told the paper: 'It was just a mistake. This wasn't about causing or taking offence, it was simply the protocol and they [the Sussexes] were always going to respect that.'
5pm: William, Andrew, Edward and Sophie arrive at Balmoral
5pm: William, Andrew, Sophie and Edward arrive at Balmoral Castle
5pm: William, Andrew, Sophie and Edward arrive at Balmoral Castle
A fleet of cars carrying the Duke of Cambridge, Duke of York and the Earl and Countess of Wessex arrives at Balmoral just after 5pm - nearly two hours after the Queen's death.
William drove his two uncles in a Range Rover as part of the cavalcade of cars, with the Duke of York in the passenger seat, while the Earl and Countess of Wessex were sitting in the back.
5.35pm: Harry's private flight from London Luton takes off
Prince Harry took a private jet from London's Luton airport at at around 5.35pm.
The duke is said to have missed the RAF flight from Northolt because he was 'so busy trying to get Meghan to Balmoral and rowing with his family'.
It is not clear when the duke was told of the Queen's death. However, 10 days ago Buckingham Palace aides reacted angrily to claims that Harry had been given just five minutes notice of his grandmother's passing before it was made public.
It came after a newspaper report claimed that the devastated royal had been the last to know about her passing - and was even told by his father after the Prime Minister.
The Telegraph suggested this was a further example of the rift between the prince and his family following his decision to quit royal duties and throw a string of accusations about the way he and Meghan were supposedly treated.
But there was clear irritation at Buckingham Palace that such claims had emerged on the eve of the Queen's funeral, which was considered hugely disrespectful in the circumstances.
In a rare statement on such a private matter, a spokesman for the King stressed: 'The public was only informed after every family member had been informed.'
The Mail understands that while it is true that Harry was told shortly before the news became public, the reason for this was because he was on a flight to Scotland and therefore not contactable. The original story was later taken down from The Telegraph's website.
6.30pm: Buckingham Palace announces the Queen's death
Buckingham Palace announces the Queen's death.
In a statement, courtiers said: 'The Queen died peacefully at Balmoral this afternoon. The King and The Queen Consort will remain at Balmoral this evening and will return to London tomorrow.'
The flag at Buckingham Palace was subsequently lowered to half mast, as people among the crowd gathered outside the gates began crying and taking pictures as a single helicopter circled the skies above - while armed police gathered in the palace grounds.
Her Majesty the Queen - Britain's longest-reigning monarch - dies peacefully at Balmoral aged 96
Her Majesty the Queen - Britain's longest-reigning monarch - dies peacefully at Balmoral aged 96
more videos
1
2
3
Watch video
Woman says mortgage lender pulled 4.5% and gave new offer of 10.5%
Watch video
Putin's high-ranking officer gets his face 'smashed' in a brawl
Watch video
Moment thug beats Ibis hotel receptionist and stamps on his head
Watch video
Liz Truss vows to help famers produce more affordable food
Watch video
Royal biographer: Prince Harry has been 'nasty' about Camilla
Watch video
Thieves in Brazil rob gas station then crash into oil change pit
Watch video
William MacDowell wheeled into Inverness Justice Centre by his wife
Watch video
Amanda Owen speaks out about tough farm life and split from husband
Watch video
MacRae family issues statement after conviction of William MacDowell
Watch video
First look at King Charles coin portrait unveiled by the Royal Mint
Watch video
Friend uses sledgehammer to break arm of Putin conscript
Watch video
Father of a Mexican mayor attempts to cut inspector with knife
6.36pm: Flags in Downing Street are lowered to half mast
The flags in Downing Street were lowered to half mast at 6.36pm following Buckingham Palace's announcement.
And staff carried a podium onto Downing Street as Ms Truss prepared to pay tribute to the nation's longest-reigning monarch outside No10.
A wide shot of Downing Street, where the Union Flag was flown at half mast after the announcement of the Queen's death
A wide shot of Downing Street, where the Union Flag was flown at half mast after the announcement of the Queen's death
The Union Flag above Downing Street was flown at half mast
The Union Flag above Downing Street was flown at half mast
6.38pm: BBC's Huw Edwards delivers the news of the Queen's death
Broadcaster Huw Edwards delivered the news of the Queen's death live on BBC One.
After an image of the flag at Buckingham Palace was shown at half mast, he told viewers: 'A few moments ago Buckingham Palace announced the death of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II.'
Edwards then read out the statement from Buckingham Palace which announced the news, before BBC One played the national anthem, showing a photograph of the Queen, followed by a royal crest on a black background and the words Queen Elizabeth II.
Reflecting on the example of leadership the Queen set as he announced her death, he said: 'A lifetime of service to people in the United Kingdom, throughout the Commonwealth and in many parts of the world. An example of leadership which didn't stray into the realm of politics and for lots of people the ideal symbol of what a constitutional monarchy should be like. Well, now the world has been told and the official notice has been posted.'
Huw Edwards announced the news solemnly, looking into the camera to repeat Buckingham Palace's statement twice
Huw Edwards announced the news solemnly, looking into the camera to repeat Buckingham Palace's statement twice
6.46pm: Harry lands at Aberdeen 15 minutes after Buckingham Palace statement
Prince Harry landed at Aberdeen Airport on a private jet. The Duke of Sussex's flight had been due to land at 6.29pm, a minute before the statement. But it was 20 minutes late taking off from London's Luton Airport.
7.06pm: Charles pays tribute to 'cherished Sovereign and a much-loved Mother'
Charles, who became King on the death of his mother, said: 'We mourn profoundly the passing of a cherished Sovereign and a much-loved Mother.
'I know her loss will be deeply felt throughout the country, the Realms and the Commonwealth, and by countless people around the world.'
King Charles III released this poignant statement reacting to the death of his 'beloved mother' as he took the throne today
King Charles III released this poignant statement reacting to the death of his 'beloved mother' as he took the throne today
7.07pm: Liz Truss praises 'extraordinary' Queen and concludes address by saying 'God save the King'
Prime Minister Liz Truss stepped out of No10 and to the podium on Downing Street at 7.07pm, dressed in black, to address the nation following the Queen's death.
Paying tribute to Her Majesty's 'extraordinary' life in public service, the Tory leader said the Queen was 'loved and admired by the people in the United Kingdom and all around the world' and called her 'a personal inspiration to me and to many Britons'.
Referring to Charles, the new King, as King Charles III, Ms Truss said: 'Today the Crown passes, as it has done for more than a thousand years, to our new monarch, our new head of state, His Majesty King Charles III.'
She added that it was 'the passing of the second Elizabethan age' and concluded her address by saying 'God save the King'.
The Prime Minister said the devastating' event marked the end of the second Elizabethan age
The Prime Minister said the devastating' event marked the end of the second Elizabethan age
more videos
1
2
3
Watch video
Woman says mortgage lender pulled 4.5% and gave new offer of 10.5%
Watch video
Putin's high-ranking officer gets his face 'smashed' in a brawl
Watch video
Moment thug beats Ibis hotel receptionist and stamps on his head
Watch video
Liz Truss vows to help famers produce more affordable food
Watch video
Royal biographer: Prince Harry has been 'nasty' about Camilla
Watch video
Thieves in Brazil rob gas station then crash into oil change pit
Watch video
William MacDowell wheeled into Inverness Justice Centre by his wife
Watch video
Amanda Owen speaks out about tough farm life and split from husband
Watch video
MacRae family issues statement after conviction of William MacDowell
Watch video
First look at King Charles coin portrait unveiled by the Royal Mint
Watch video
Friend uses sledgehammer to break arm of Putin conscript
Watch video
Father of a Mexican mayor attempts to cut inspector with knife
7.24pm: William and Kate's Twitter account @KensingtonRoyal refers to couple as Duke and Duchess of Cornwall and Cambridge
From 7.24pm, William and Kate's Twitter account @KensingtonRoyal referred to the couple as The Duke and Duchess of Cornwall and Cambridge.
7.45pm: Harry and Meghan's Archewell website homepage is blacked-out
At 7.45pm, Harry and Meghan's Archewell website homepage became a blacked-out landing page with the words: 'In loving memory of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 1926-2022.'
7.52pm: Harry arrives at Balmoral four hours after the Queen's death
The Duke of Sussex arrived at Balmoral at 7.52pm, four hours after the Queen's death and nearly 90 minutes after Buckingham Palace announced the passing.
By the time he landed at Aberdeen at 6.46pm, it was 16 minutes after the palace had made the announcement.
Harry then faced a lonely drive to the castle, finally arriving at 7.52pm where he joined other members of the Royal Family in mourning the Queen's death.
7.52pm: The Duke of Sussex joined other members of the Royal Family in mourning the Queen's death
7.52pm: The Duke of Sussex joined other members of the Royal Family in mourning the Queen's death
He looked ashen-faced on the back seat of the Range Rover as it swept into the Balmoral estate. As well as losing a beloved grandmother, he may have been reflecting on his future without her as monarch. She remained fond of him, in spite of recent challenges, and he was said to have retained an ability to make her laugh.
Harry stayed for just 12 hours before returning to Windsor to be with his wife, having apparently 'refused' to have dinner with his father and brother after Meghan was banned from joining the family at Balmoral on the day the Queen died, it was claimed last week.
The Sun reported that Harry was invited to dine at Birkhall, his father's home on the Balmoral estate, with the King, William and Camilla, Queen Consort. But he was said to have instead remained at Balmoral Castle with the Earl and Countess of Wessex and the Duke of York.
A source told the newspaper: 'Harry was so busy trying to get Meghan to Balmoral and rowing with his family that he missed the flight.
'Charles has an open invitation for Harry to dine with him whenever he is in the country. But Harry was so furious that he refused to eat with his father and brother...
'And he got out of Balmoral at the earliest opportunity to catch the first commercial flight back to London.'
Harry left Balmoral at around 8am the next morning to catch a plane for Heathrow Airport before being reunited with his wife at their UK residence Frogmore Cottage in Windsor.
Revealed: Doctor who signed Queen's death certificate had served her for 34 years after being personally appointed as Apothecary to Her Majesty's Household at Balmoral during Buckingham Palace ceremony in 1988
The Queen's death certificate was signed by a Scottish doctor who has worked for the monarchy for more than 30 years, it can be revealed.
Dr Douglas James Allan Glass - who once saved the late Queen Mother's life when she choked on a fish bone - began his role as Apothecary to Her Majesty's Household at Balmoral on March 30 1988.
His title became official during a special presentation at Buckingham Palace just a few days later on April 5 the same year.
The incident with the Queen Mother occurred when a fish bone lodged in her throat while staying at Balmoral in May 1993.
She eventually had to have surgery under general anaesthetic to remove it at Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, where she spent several days.
Revealed: The Queen's death certificate has been released and says her cause of death was 'old age'
Dr Douglas James Allan Glass began his role as Apothecary to Her Majesty's Household at Balmoral on March 30 1998 (Pictured: Dr Douglas Glass and his now ex-wife Suzanne at their romantic hillside wedding overlooking Royal Deeside near Ballater in April 1996)
Dr Douglas James Allan Glass began his role as Apothecary to Her Majesty's Household at Balmoral on March 30 1998 (Pictured: Dr Douglas Glass and his now ex-wife Suzanne at their romantic hillside wedding overlooking Royal Deeside near Ballater in April 1996)
What does it mean to die of 'old age'? Is it a common cause of death?
It's common to hear that someone has died of 'old age' - but official advice states that doctors should avoid only using 'old age' on death certificates.
The description is only accepted if the patient is over 80 and if the doctor has personally cared for the patient for a long period, observing a gradual decline.
It also can only be used if doctors are unaware of any identifiable disease or injury that contributed to the death.
The phrase refers to the 'lifetime sum total of injury' to the body's tissues and organs, doctors say.
However, other experts argue that you can't truly die of old age. Instead, they claim age simply makes someone more susceptible to heart or kidney disease, two illnesses that can kill.
Dr Glass's role is similar to that of Dr Timothy Evans, who looked after the late monarch's health at the royal household in Windsor.
Dr Glass also works as a GP in the Highlands village of Aboyne, around 20 miles from Balmoral Castle, where the Queen died aged 96 on Thursday September 8.
He was listed as working at the Braemar Health Clinic until at least July 2020, although it is not clear if he still works there.
He signed the death certificate of Her Majesty on Monday (September 26), confirming that she had died of old age.
However at the time of Queen Elizabeth II's death, her top royal doctor was Professor Sir Huw Thomas, who is Head of the Medical Household and Physician to the Queen and has also delivered some of the younger royals.
Prince Philip, who died at Windsor Castle, had 'old age listed as his cause of death by Sir Thomas but the Queen died in Scotland.
He previously made the news in 2006 when he separated from his wife after discovering she was pregnant by her guitar tutor, who she had been seeing behind his back.
The Queen's death certificate, released today by National Records of Scotland, revealed the late monarch had died at 3.10pm - more than three hours before the public was informed.
The informant of her death was the Princess Royal, Queen Elizabeth II's daughter Princess Anne.
The historic document, which gives the monarch's occupation as 'Her Majesty The Queen, reveals that only King Charles and his only sister were by their mother's side when she died in Aberdeenshire.
Prince William, Prince Andrew, Prince Edward and his wife, Sophie Countess of Wessex, were in the air when the Queen passed away.
Dr Douglas James Allan Glass began his roles as Apothecary to Her Majesty's Household at Balmoral (pictured) on March 30 1998
Dr Douglas James Allan Glass began his roles as Apothecary to Her Majesty's Household at Balmoral (pictured) on March 30 1998
They had been racing to Balmoral took off from RAF Northolt in South Ruislip, west London, at 2.39pm, landing an hour later.
Prince Harry was not on the plane with his brother and had to make his own journey to Scotland on a jet from Luton, after his grandmother had died. He landed in Aberdeen at 6.46pm, 16 minutes after the Palace made its announcement.
Old age was the only cause of death listed, with no other contributing factors. It was the same cause of death as on her husband Prince Philip's death certificate.
Paul Lowe, the Registrar General for Scotland, confirmed that the Queen's death was registered in Aberdeenshire on September 16 2022.
_________________
http://www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
Secret Rulers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0p-e2ng0SI
http://www.thisweek.org.uk
http://www.dialectradio.co.uk
http://www.911forum.org.uk |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling
Site Admin
Joined: 26 Jul 2006
Posts: 1395
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, UK
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2022 2:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tory chair admits he and Kwasi Kwarteng went to Budget day hedge funders' champagne bash
Jake Berry has confirmed he attended a drinks reception for business leaders - including hedge fund managers - at the home of a Tory donor hours after the mini-budget
Kwasi Kwarteng gave a speech to business leaders at the party, it was confirmed
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/breaking-tory-chair-admits-kwasi-28133582
ByDave BurkeSenior News Reporter
09:03, 2 Oct 2022Updated09:58, 2 Oct 2022
The chairman of the Conservative Party has confirmed he attended a champagne bash with Kwasi Kwarteng hours after the controversial mini-budget - and did not rule out government plans being shared.
Jake Berry this morning said he was at a drinks reception for business leaders - including at least one hedge fund manager - at the home of a Tory donor on Friday, September 23.
But he dismissed this as the "normal drumbeat" of Tory party life - amid calls from the Lib Dems for an inquiry into the gathering.
According to the Sunday Times, some of those present may have gone on to profit from the plummeting pound as markets went into turmoil.
Insiders also claimed that Mr Kwarteng outlined future Tory spending plans at the event, which saw business leaders gather at the London home of Andrew Law.
Mr Berry told Sky's Sophie Ridge on Sunday: "We often have drinks receptions for donors in the Conservative Party. These people should be lauded because as we don't have public funding for public funding of political parties..
Liz Truss admits she should have done a 'better job' over Budget disaster
Tory Party chairman Jake Berry confirmed he attended the champagne party on the evening of the mini-budget
Tory Party chairman Jake Berry confirmed he attended the champagne party on the evening of the mini-budget ( Image:
Getty Images)
"It's the normal drumbeat of Treasury events as we call them, that we have all the time."
Asked if hedge fund managers - who subsequently profited from the tumbling pound - were in attendance, Mr Berry said: "I'm sure there were."
Care by VolvoThe electric XC40. For a clear monthly fee. Subscribe online now.
The Daily FoodiesBrits Outsmart Surging Supermarket Prices By Ordering HelloFresh
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
He said: "There was one that I know of but in terms of the rest of the people there lots of people were people who had grown and started businesses..."
Mr Berry, asked how the event was acceptable, said: "I'm not sure if any of them did make money from the crash in the pound."
"Let's be absolutely clear this is part of the normal drumbeat of Treasury events within the Conservative party," he said.
"I was there, there was no confidential information that was discussed, it was a get-together with Britain's leading entrepreneurs who we should thank for creating growth in our economy..."
Quizzed about Mr Kwarteng's mood as he sipped champagne, Mr Berry said: "I'm not even sure the Chancellor was drinking champagne, I think he was drinking a soft drink.
"He was absolutely clear that he's set out a path for this country to create growth."
Insiders told The Sunday Times that Mr Kwarteng gave insights about future government spending plans - but Mr Berry said he did not overhear him doing so.
The Chancellor spoke to business leaders at a champagne bash the night of the mini-budget
The Chancellor spoke to business leaders at a champagne bash the night of the mini-budget ( Image:
PA)
The party chairman said Mr Kwarteng addressed the gathering, and did not outline what his next moves would be during his speech.
However he stopped short of saying the Chancellor did not do so in private conversations.
Mr Berry said: "I certainly didn't hear him make those comments... I can't categorically rule it out because I didn't hear every conversation.
"We were all having our own conversations, but I can categorically rule out that in the address he gave he didn't give any insight into future plans."
Meanwhile PM Liz Truss said: “The Chancellor meets business people all the time. That’s his job. I do not manage Kwasi Kwarteng’s diary, believe me.”
She continued: “I get up every morning as Prime Minister thinking how can we make our country more successful, how can we reassure people, how can we get people through these difficult times.
“That’s what I’m focused on, that’s what the Chancellor is focused on, and that’s what the whole Cabinet is focused on.”
Tory officials said Mr Kwarteng was at the gathering, which was arranged by the party’s campaign headquarters, for one hour to give a five-minute talk on his mini-budget.
A source close to the Chancellor told the Mirror: “Any suggestion attendees had access to privileged information is total nonsense.
"The Growth Plan published on Friday included a commitment to review our Tax Code to make it simpler, better for families and more pro-growth.
SIMILAR ARTICLES TO THIS
partner logo
Powered by
"The government’s ambitions on lowering the tax burden are hardly a state secret.”
Liberal Democrat Treasury spokesperson Sarah Olney said: "While struggling homeowners saw their mortgage bills spiral, it seems the chancellor was sipping champagne with hedge fund managers profiting from the falling pound.
"How out of touch can you get. We need an official inquiry into this now."
_________________
http://www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
Secret Rulers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0p-e2ng0SI
http://www.thisweek.org.uk
http://www.dialectradio.co.uk
http://www.911forum.org.uk |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling
Site Admin
Joined: 26 Jul 2006
Posts: 1395
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, UK
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 1:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Health Viewpoints: More Studies Confirm the COVID Jab Does More Harm Than Good
https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/more-studies-confirm-the-covid-jab-does-more-harm-than-good_4774529.html
Real-world data now conclusively show these risks are extremely real. (Dado Ruvic/Illustration/Reuters)
Real-world data now conclusively show these risks are extremely real. (Dado Ruvic/Illustration/Reuters)
Health Viewpoints
More Studies Confirm the COVID Jab Does More Harm Than Good
BY Joseph Mercola TIMEOctober 4, 2022 PRINT
Cardiologist calls for the immediate suspension of all COVID shots as real-world data show they cause more harm than good.
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
A peer-reviewed scientific review in the Journal of Insulin Resistance, written by cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra, calls for the immediate suspension of all COVID shots as real-world data show they cause more harm than good
Data from Israel shows myocarditis post-jab is occurring at a rate of 1 in 6,000. Hong Kong data from male children and teens found a rate of 1 in 2,700
Data from the British Yellow Card system shows 1 in 120 people who have received at least one mRNA injection suffer an adverse event “that is beyond mild.” In Norway, the rate of serious adverse events post-jab is 1 in 1,000 after two doses of Pfizer
Researchers looking at data from the FDA, Health Canada and the Pfizer and Moderna trials concluded the absolute risk of a serious adverse event from the mRNA shots was 1 in 800, which massively exceeds the risk of COVID-19 hospitalization found in randomized controlled trials
Leaked audio from a June 2022 meeting between Israeli researchers and the Israeli Ministry of Healthy reveals the Pfizer jab causes long-term adverse effects and is associated with more severe side effects upon rechallenge (i.e., with repeated doses). While the researchers wanted to warn the public, the Ministry altered their final report to say that adverse effects are mild and short-lived. The government then canceled any further research into adverse effects
The COVID jabs are an absolute disaster, with injuries and deaths piling up by the day. Yet so-called health authorities, doctors, media, drug makers and many of the jabbed themselves claim there’s nothing to see here. Ever since their release, brave medical professionals have spoken out against them, calling for a more cautious approach.
Now, a peer-reviewed scientific review,1 2 3 published in two parts4 5 in the Journal of Insulin Resistance calls for the immediate suspension of all COVID shots as real-world data show they cause more harm than good.
According to this paper, “Curing the Pandemic of Misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Through Real Evidence-Based Medicine,” authored by cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra:
“In the non-elderly population the ‘number needed to treat’ to prevent a single death runs into the thousands. Re-analysis of randomized controlled trials using the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) technology suggests a greater risk of serious adverse events from the vaccines than being hospitalized from COVID-19.
Pharmacovigilance systems and real-world safety data, coupled with plausible mechanisms of harm, are deeply concerning, especially in relation to cardiovascular safety.
Mirroring a potential signal from the Pfizer Phase 3 trial, a significant rise in cardiac arrest calls to ambulances in England was seen in 2021, with similar data emerging from Israel in the 16–39-year-old age group.
Conclusion: It cannot be said that the consent to receive these agents was fully informed, as is required ethically and legally. A pause and reappraisal of global vaccination policies for COVID-19 is long overdue.”
COVID Jab Boomerang
In recent months, disability, excess mortality and live birth statistics all point in the same direction. Something horrific started happening around April 2021, and continues to get worse. Something is killing an extraordinary number of people in the prime of their life, who should have decades left to live. Something is causing people to file for permanent disability in numbers we’ve not seen before.
What changed in the world, in 2021? That is the question. The answer is ridiculously simple to answer, yet many choose to drive their heads deeper into the sand than face plain facts. The COVID shots, using mRNA technology to trigger antibody production in a way that had never been used before, were rolled out in 2021 under emergency use authorization. That’s what changed.
At the time of their rollout, human trials were far from finished, and much of their value had already been destroyed by unblinding the trials and offering the real injection to everyone in the placebo groups.6
This year, we’ve also come to realize that Pfizer, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have all repeatedly lied about the safety and effectiveness of the shots, as Pfizer’s own trial data show they’re about as dangerous as they come.
The only reason we now know this is because the FDA was sued and forced by a judge to release the trial data they initially wanted to keep hidden for 75 years. Pfizer data is now being released at a pace of 55,000 pages per month,7 and these batches have proven to be a treasure trove of bad and worse news.
Pfizer hid serious injuries, falsely categorizing almost all of them as unrelated to the shot without investigation, and misrepresented data showing massive risks as being of no concern. Participants who suffered serious injuries were often simply withdrawn from the trial, and their data excluded from the results.8
Real-world data now conclusively show these risks are extremely real. For example, Pfizer’s Phase 3 clinical trial showed an increased risk for cardiac problems, and during 2021, U.K. ambulance services recorded an extra 27,800 cardiac arrest calls above the national average in previous years, or about 500 per day9 10 — and disproportionally among the young.11 Importantly, COVID-19 cannot account for this rise, as the relevant increase began in the spring of 2021.
A Change of Heart
In his paper, Malhotra details his personal journey from staunch COVID jab proponent to concerned questioner. He got Pfizer’s two-dose regimen at the end of January 2021. You can see more of Maholtra’s efforts in the lecture he recently gave captured in the video above.
A few months later, his father, who also got the shot, suffered cardiac arrest six months after his second dose. The post-mortem findings were “shocking and inexplicable,” Malhotra writes, and got him to take another look at the data.
“After six months of critically appraising the data myself, speaking to eminent scientists involved in COVID-19 research, vaccine safety and development, and two investigative medical journalists, I have slowly and reluctantly concluded that contrary to my own initial dogmatic beliefs, Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine is far from being as safe and effective as we first thought,” Malhotra writes.12
He goes on to review how post-mortem examination revealed his father, who was extremely active and fit, had severe blockages in two of the three major arteries. His left anterior descending artery was 90% blocked and his right coronary was 75% blocked. The last scan, “a few years earlier,” according to Malhotra, had revealed perfect blood flow and no obstructions. He continues:13
“I couldn’t explain his post-mortem findings, especially as there was no evidence of an actual heart attack … This was precisely my own special area of research. That is, how to delay progression of heart disease and even potentially reverse it … Then, in November 2021, I was made aware of a peer-reviewed abstract published in Circulation, with concerning findings.
In over 500 middle-aged patients under regular follow up, using a predictive score model based on inflammatory markers that are strongly correlated with risk of heart attack, the mRNA vaccine was associated with significantly increasing the risk of a coronary event within five years from 11% pre-mRNA vaccine to 25% 2–10 weeks post mRNA vaccine.
An early and relevant criticism of the validity of the findings was that there was no control group, but nevertheless, even if partially correct, that would mean that there would be a large acceleration in progression of coronary artery disease, and more importantly heart attack risk, within months of taking the jab.
I wondered whether my father’s Pfizer vaccination, which he received six months earlier, could have contributed to his unexplained premature death and so I began to critically appraise the data.”
Data Points to Consider
Malhotra reviews a number of data points in the paper, including:14
Pfizer data showing there were four cardiac arrests in the injection group and only one in the placebo group.
The misleading use of relative risk reduction (95%) when speaking of effectiveness, rather than absolute risk reduction, which was only 0.84%.
119 people would have to be injected to prevent one positive test, which may or may not be indicative of infection.
Pfizer’s trial found no statistically significant reduction in serious illness or COVID mortality from the injection over the course of six months (the length of the trial). Moreover, the risk of serious COVID-19 infection in the placebo group was only 0.04%, showing just how low the risk of serious illness was in the first place, and this despite the fact that the regions chosen for the trial were chosen for their perceived high prevalence of infection.
While there were two deaths from COVID in the placebo group and only one COVID death in the injection group, all-cause mortality over a longer period revealed 19 deaths in the injection group and 17 deaths in the placebo group.
The pediatric trial used a surrogate measure of antibody levels rather than reduction in symptomatic infection, even though there was no known correlation between antibody levels and protection from infection. The FDA even warns that: “[R]esults from currently authorized SARS-COV-2 antibody tests should not be used to evaluate a person’s level of immunity or protection from COVID-19 at any time, and especially after the person received a COVID-19 vaccination.”
Extrapolating Data to Determine Protection Against Death
Malhotra goes on to describe how he extrapolated data to determine the level of protection these mRNA shots provide against COVID-related death:15
“Now that we know what the published trial did and did not show in terms of the vaccine efficacy, we can attempt to extrapolate what the effect of the vaccine would be in reducing mortality or any other adverse outcome from the virus.
If there is a 1 in 119 chance the vaccine protects you from getting symptomatic infection from ancestral variants, then to find the protection against death, this figure (n = 119) must be multiplied by the number of infections that lead to a single death for each age group.
This would give (for up to two months after the inoculation) the absolute risk reduction (for death) from the vaccine. For example, if my risk at age 44 from dying from Delta (should I get infected with it) is 1 in 3,000, then the absolute risk reduction from the vaccine protecting me from death is 1 over 3,000 multiplied by 119, that is, 1 per 357,000 …
From observational data it is possible to calculate the number who would need to be vaccinated to prevent a COVID-19 death. For example, comparing the population death rates during the Delta wave gives 230 for people over 80s needing to be vaccinated to prevent a single death in that period with that number rising to 520 for people in their 70s and 10,000 for people in their 40s …
Depending on your age, several hundreds or thousands of people like you would need to be injected in order to prevent one person from dying from the Delta variant of COVID-19 over a period of around three months.
For the over 80s, this figure is at least 230, but it rises the younger you are, reaching at least 2,600 for people in their 50s, 10,000 for those in their 40s, and 93,000 for those between 18 and 29 years. For omicron, which has been shown to be 30% – 50% less lethal, meaning significantly more people would need to be vaccinated to prevent one death.”
What Are the Harms?
Next, Malhotra reviews the hams, noting that one of the most common side effects reported is myocarditis, or inflammation of the heart, especially among young men. He rejects health authorities’ claim that myocarditis is far more prevalent in those who suffer serious COVID infection, stating:16
“Incidence of myocarditis rocketed from spring 2021 when vaccines were rolled out to the younger cohorts having remained within normal levels for the full year prior, despite COVID-19.
With the most up-to-date evidence, a paper from Israel found that the infection itself, prior to roll- out of the vaccine, conferred no increase in the risks of either myocarditis or pericarditis from COVID-19, strongly suggesting that the increases observed in earlier studies were because of the mRNA vaccines, with or without COVID-19 infections as an additional risk in the vaccinated …
Although vaccine-induced myocarditis is not often fatal in young adults, MRI scans reveal that, of the ones admitted to hospital, approximately 80% have some degree of myocardial damage. It is like suffering a small heart attack and sustaining some — likely permanent — heart muscle injury.”
Data from Israel shows myocarditis post-jab is occurring at a rate of 1 in 6,000. Hong Kong data from male children and teens found a rate of 1 in 2,700. Data from the British Yellow Card system shows 1 in 120 people who have received at least one mRNA injection suffer an adverse event “that is beyond mild.”
In Norway, Malhotra notes, the rate of serious adverse events post-jab is 1 in 1,000 after two doses of Pfizer. These are injuries that are life changing for the worse.
In all, nearly 500,000 adverse events had been reported to the Yellow Card system when Malhotra wrote this paper, which he points out is “unprecedented in the modern medical era and equals the total number of reports received in the first 40 years of the Yellow Card reporting system (for all medicines — not just vaccines) up to 2020.”
What VAERS Data Tell Us
The same trend is seen in the U.S., where the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has received more adverse event reports for the COVID jabs than all other vaccines over the last 30 years combined. Malhotra writes:
“As with the UK’s system, the level of reports — including serious ones — associated with COVID-19 vaccines is completely unprecedented. For example, over 24,000 deaths have now been recorded in VAERS as of March 2, 2022; 29% of these occurred within 48 h of injection, and half within two weeks.
The average reporting rate prior to 2020 was less than 300 deaths per annum. One explanation often given for this is that the COVID-19 vaccine roll-out is unprecedented in scope; however, this is not valid, since (for the last decade at any rate) the United States has administered 150 million – 200 million vaccinations annually.”
Another criticism of VAERS is that ‘anyone can make an entry,’ yet, in fact, an analysis of a sample of 250 early deaths suggested that the vast majority are hospital or physician entries, and knowingly filing a false VAERS report is a violation of Federal law punishable by fine and imprisonment.
Given that VAERS was set up to generate early signals of potential harm for new vaccines, and was instrumental in doing so for several products, it seems perverse to only now criticize it as unreliable when there seem to have been no changes in the way it operates.”
It has been estimated that serious adverse effects that are officially reported are actually a gross underestimate, and this should be borne in mind … For example, a paper by David Kessler (a former FDA Commissioner) cites data suggesting that as few as 1% of serious adverse events are reported to the FDA. Similarly, in relation to the Yellow Card scheme in the United Kingdom, it has been estimated that only 10% of serious adverse effects are reported.”
1 in 800 Absolute Risk of Serious Side Effect
Malhotra also cites a recent study17 “coauthored by some of the most trusted medical scientists in the world in relation to data transparency,” which looked at data from the FDA, Health Canada and the Pfizer and Moderna trials.
Researchers looking at data from the FDA, Health Canada and the Pfizer and Moderna trials concluded the absolute risk of a serious adverse event from the mRNA shots was 1 in 800, which massively exceeds the risk of COVID-19 hospitalization found in randomized controlled trials.
They concluded the absolute risk of a serious adverse event from the mRNA shots was 1 in 800, which massively exceeds the risk of COVID-19 hospitalization found in randomized controlled trials.
“Given these observations, and reappraisal of the randomized controlled trial data of mRNA products, it seems difficult to argue that the vaccine roll-out has been net beneficial in all age groups … and when the possible short-, medium- and unknown longer-term harms are considered (especially for multiple injections, robust safety data for which simply does not exist), the roll-out into the entire population seems, at best, a reckless gamble,” Malhotra writes.18
“It’s important to acknowledge that the risks of adverse events from the vaccine remain constant, whereas the benefits reduce over time, as new variants are (1) less virulent and (2) not targeted by an outdated product.
Having appraised the data, it remains a real possibility that my father’s sudden cardiac death was related to the vaccine. A pause and reappraisal of vaccination Policies for COVID-19 is long overdue.”
The Israeli Cover-Up
In related news, leaked audio from a June 2022 meeting between Israeli researchers and the Ministry of Healthy reveals the researchers knew the COVID shots were associated with serious risks and wanted to alert the public.
However, whereas the researchers pointed out evidence showing the Pfizer jabs cause long-term adverse effects and are associated with more severe side effects upon rechallenge (i.e., with repeated doses), the Ministry altered the researcher’s final report to say that adverse effects are mild and short-lived. The government then canceled any further research into adverse effects.
At the end of September 2022, GB News interviewed Dr. Yaffa Shir Raz, who broke the story internationally19 (see video above for leaked audio and GB’s report).20 21 Importantly, the researchers noted the phenomenon of rechallenge is very strong evidence of causality, meaning the shots are definitely causing the problems reported.
However, they also warned the Ministry of Health that they’d have to be careful with the wording and think “medical-legal,” as the evidence would expose the government to liability, since they’d not been upfront with the risks and had endorsed the shots. The Ministry, apparently, decided to simply alter the conclusions of the study and close down further investigation rather than risk liability.
COVID Jab Makers Seek Authorization for Child Boosters
At the same time as more and more damning data are coming to light, Pfizer and Moderna are both seeking emergency use authorization for their bivalent COVID boosters for children. Moderna is seeking authorization for children ages 6 through 17, while Pfizer’s shot is for children aged 5 through 11.22 As reported by Reuters September 23, 2022:23
“… the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said it expects COVID-19 vaccine boosters targeting circulating variants of the virus to be available for children aged 5-11 years by mid-October.
Moderna’s mRNA-1273.222, a bivalent booster shot, contains the dominant BA.4/BA.5 variants along with the original coronavirus strain. The updated vaccine is already authorized for adults, while rival Pfizer’s bivalent vaccine is authorized as a booster dose for children over 12 years of age.”
Follow the Data and Think for Yourself
Considering how reckless the FDA and CDC have been so far, there’s little doubt they’ll authorize these reformulated boosters for children, even though they’ve only been tested for antibody levels in mice. Meanwhile, in the real world, the injuries and deaths continue to pile up.
Were there any sanity and humanity left inside the walls of our health agencies, these shots would be pulled from the market without delay. Unfortunately, that doesn’t appear to be the case, which means We the People are the ones who must put a stop to the carnage by educating each other and simply saying “NO” to these and all future mRNA shots.
Originally published Oct 4 2022 on Mercola.com
References
1Journal of Insulin Resistance 2022; 5(1): a71
2Journal of Insulin Resistance 2022; 5(1): a71 Full paper
3Daily Sceptic September 25, 2022
4Journal of Insulin Resistance 2022; 5(1): a71 Full paper Part 1
5Journal of Insulin Resistance 2022; 5(1): a71 Full paper Part 2
6Journal of Insulin Resistance 2022; 5(1): a71 Full paper, Page 5
7FDA News January 10, 2022
8Journal of Insulin Resistance 2022; 5(1): a71 Full paper, Page 5
9Emergency-Live March 17, 2022
10Maajid Nawaz Substack September 26, 2022
11Journal of Insulin Resistance 2022; 5(1): a71 Full paper, Page 6
12Journal of Insulin Resistance 2022; 5(1): a71 Full paper, Page 2
13Journal of Insulin Resistance 2022; 5(1): a71 Full paper, Page 2
14Journal of Insulin Resistance 2022; 5(1): a71 Full paper
15Journal of Insulin Resistance 2022; 5(1): a71 Full paper, Page 4
16Journal of Insulin Resistance 2022; 5(1): a71 Full paper, Page 5
17Vaccine September 22, 2022; 40(40): 5798-5805
18Journal of Insulin Resistance 2022; 5(1): a71 Full paper, Page 7
19Brownstone September 20, 2022
20Twitter Efrat Fenigson September 24, 2022
21COVID Truths
22CNN September 26, 2022
23Reuters September 23, 2022
SHARE
Friends Read FreeCopyFacebookTweet
Joseph Mercola
Joseph Mercola
Follow
Dr. Joseph Mercola is the founder of Mercola.com. An osteopathic physician, best-selling author, and recipient of multiple awards in the field of natural health, his primary vision is to change the modern health paradigm by providing people with a valuable resource to help them take control of their health.
_________________
http://www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
Secret Rulers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0p-e2ng0SI
http://www.thisweek.org.uk
http://www.dialectradio.co.uk
http://www.911forum.org.uk |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling
Site Admin
Joined: 26 Jul 2006
Posts: 1395
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, UK
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2022 12:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Many jabbed are now having second thoughts. It only takes ONE doctor to explain the horrifying medical lies.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/bjoMr2U852CI/
The disastrous legacy left by lockdown as non-Covid excess deaths overtake Covid deaths
https://archive.ph/2022.10.29-154446/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/10/29/disastrous-legacy-left-lockdown-non-covid-excess-deaths-overtake/
Experts believe higher deaths from heart complaints and diabetes mean the indirect effects of the pandemic will be greater than Covid itself
By Sarah Knapton, Science Editor 29 October 2022 • 4:04pm
The uptick in unexpected deaths shows no sign of slowing as emergency admissions for heart problems increased by over 25,000
The uptick in unexpected deaths shows no sign of slowing as emergency admissions for heart problems increased by over 25,000
When Britain first locked down on March 23 2020, the average daily death rate from Covid was around 213, triggering understandable alarm and the ushering in of strict restrictions.
Now a similar number of unexpected deaths are occurring each day, the majority of which are not primarily caused by coronavirus.
Yet there is largely silence from the government and health service.
Data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) shows that in the past six months there have been more excess deaths from causes other than Covid, than deaths ‘due to’ coronavirus for the entire year.
Figures reveal there were 18,394 deaths ‘due to’ Covid recorded this year in England and Wales. But since May there have been 23,195 excess deaths where the primary cause was another condition.
Some of those people did die with a coronavirus infection, but it was not the main reason for the death.
Experts continue to argue over the reasons behind this recent uptick in unexpected deaths, which shows no sign of slowing.
But it is likely that collateral damage from the pandemic, coupled with long term NHS problems, have collided into a perfect, and deadly, storm.
How excess non-Covid deaths are outstripping Covid deaths
Covid
Excess non-covid
Excess total
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
Aug
Sep
Oct
May
Jun
Jul
Amitava Banerjee, Professor of Clinical Data Science and Honorary Consultant Cardiologist at the Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, recently completed work showing how admissions for heart problems declined steeply during the pandemic.
In 2020, there were 31,064 fewer hospital admissions for heart patients, 14,506 fewer emergency admissions and 16,560 fewer elective procedures compared to 2016-2019 in England, Scotland and Wales.
Elective admissions were still down in 2021, with 10,996 fewer operations but, alarmingly, emergency admissions for heart problems had increased by 25,878.
Amitava Banerjee, Professor of Clinical Data Science, showed admissions for heart problems declined steeply during the pandemic
Amitava Banerjee, Professor of Clinical Data Science, showed admissions for heart problems declined steeply during the pandemic
Prof Banerjee fears that the indirect effects of the pandemic will turn out to be greater than the harm from Covid itself, and that it is vital for future preparedness planning to take into account long-term outcomes.
“Treating and preventing underlying diseases is not a can that should be kicked down the road,” he said.
“We should never ever have had a pandemic preparedness team that did not consider the indirect and long-term effects. Traditionally, it has been virologists and infection specialists, but with a pandemic of this scale across so many countries, that is not fit.
Indirect effects will lead to more deaths
“We focussed on the direct effects of excess deaths from Covid but from the beginning it’s likely the indirect effects will lead to more deaths, and more morbidity and more economic impacts than Covid deaths itself.”
Some experts have argued that the figures may not be quite as worrying because the ONS does not take into account population changes, simply comparing weekly figures to the expected five year average (excluding 2020). As the population ages, more people would be expected to die each year.
However other measures which do take the ageing population into account are also showing worrying rises in excess deaths.
A recent report from the Institute of Actuaries Continuous Mortality Investigation (CMI) showed that in the third quarter - July, August and September - Britain saw the highest mortality since 2010.
Cobus Daneel, Chair of the CMI Mortality Projections Committee, said: “The third quarter of 2022 saw unusually high mortality for the time of year – higher than any third quarter since 2010.
“There were more deaths than expected from non-Covid causes. This contrasts with most of the pandemic period, when non-Covid deaths were lower than expected.”
The situation is all the more unusual as mortality rates should have fallen after the pandemic because so many people died early, an effect known as ‘harvesting.’ Instead we are seeing the reverse trend.
Admissions for heart conditions fell significantly during the pandemic
2016-2019
2020
2021
Acute Coronary
Syndrome
Heart Failure
10K
7.5K
5K
2.5
0
Jan
Mar
May
Jul
Sep
Nov
Jan
Mar
May
Jul
Sep
Nov
Transient Ishaemic
Attack
Aortic Aneurysm
10K
7.5K
5K
2.5
0
Jan
Mar
May
Jul
Sep
Nov
Jan
Mar
May
Jul
Sep
Nov
Venous
Thromboembolism
Peripheral Arterial
Desease
10K
7.5K
5K
2.5
0
Jan
Mar
May
Jul
Sep
Nov
Jan
Mar
May
Jul
Sep
Nov
SOURCE: MEDRXIV
The government has made a half-hearted attempt to find out what is going on with excess deaths, asking for a report from the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities (OEHD).
The report showed a worrying increase in deaths in people who had heart complaints and diabetes, many of which were preventable.
Recent reports have found that people hospitalised with Covid-19 are more likely to suffer heart problems, particularly in the first month after their release, which could be leading to some of the excess.
Epidemiologist Veena Raleigh, a senior fellow at The King’s Fund, who recently investigated the probable causes for the excess believes this could be a real factor, along with NHS problems.
She told The Sunday Telegraph: “The continuing trend of higher numbers of deaths in England and Wales than expected (compared with previous years), apparent since the spring, is worrying.
“From April to mid-October there have been almost 30,000 excess deaths, of which one-third have been due to Covid-19 – a reminder that the virus remains a life-threatening risk.
Bulk of excess deaths are unexplained
“While some 3000 excess deaths occurred during the excessively warm summer periods, that still leaves the bulk of excess deaths unexplained.
“Deaths from cardiovascular disease and diabetes, in particular, show a significant excess; Covid-19 increases the risk of subsequent cardiovascular problems and could in part be driving excess deaths.
“An overstretched NHS coping with a large backlog of care and unprecedented pressures on emergency services could be another factor.”
Health experts are continuing to call for a full government investigation, with Dr Charles Levinson of the private GP service DoctorCall complaining that he had now been ‘ringing the alarm on this for months and months.’
But some experts believe it will be tricky to tease out which deaths should be included.
Prof Kevin McConway, Emeritus Professor of Applied Statistics, at the the Open University said: “There's no way of going through the list of people who died and saying ‘This death is an excess death, this death isn’t’, because there’s nothing resembling a sensible way of deciding on an individual basis who would have lived and who would have died.
“That all makes any investigation of the reasons for the excess deaths rather difficult.”
However experts believe there is still too much attention being paid to the direct effects of Covid at the expense of the wider impacts.
Prof Banerjee said specialists should come together to pool their data on excess deaths in their field.
“What I see is still a focus on the direct effects of Covid,” he said.
“Nobody who is in charge of the NHS, or any of the new health secretaries, are making any noises about it.”
_________________
http://www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
Secret Rulers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0p-e2ng0SI
http://www.thisweek.org.uk
http://www.dialectradio.co.uk
http://www.911forum.org.uk |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling
Site Admin
Joined: 26 Jul 2006
Posts: 1395
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, UK
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
http://911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=179776#179776
Archduke Karl of Austria describes Brexit as a “reality show”
By Oskar Aanmoen 26th March 2019
https://royalcentral.co.uk/europe/archduke-karl-of-austria-describes-brexit-as-a-reality-show-118548/
The Archduke of Austria, Karl von Habsburg, has described Brexit as a “reality show”. He made the comments in a speech following his re-election as leader of the International Paneuropean Union, the oldest of the current organisations in the world promoting unity across the continent. He won the leadership contest with 100% of the votes.
Archduke Karl said he was grateful for the renewed trust and went on to speak to the movement about his thoughts on the current European political situation. Karl von Habsburg said: “It’s only a week before Brexit, and still nothing is decided. Brexit shows that there is no alternative to Europe, the EU is committed to success”.
The Archduke stated: “The world and Europe are in turmoil, on the one hand because of the unclear circumstances caused by Brexit and on the other because of the populism that is rampant in many countries of the Union”.
His Majesty King Michael I of Romania together Archduke Karl of Austria at the funeral of Crown Prince Otto of Austria who was the first cousin of King Michael’s wife Queen Anne. Photo: HertigAvRomanjie via Wikimedia Commons.
The International Paneuropean Union is the oldest European unification movement. It began with the publishing of Count Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi’s manifesto Paneuropa in 1923, which presented the idea of a unified European State. Archduke Karl`s father, Crown Prince Otto von Habsburg led the international organisation from 1973 to 2004.
Archduke Karl of Austria is the grandson of the last Austrian emperor. Today, he is the President of the Pan-European movement, as well as the pretender to the Austro-Hungarian throne and a former member of the European Parliament.
He is also referred to by his ancestral titles as Royal Prince of Hungary, Bohemia and Croatia. He is the current head of the House of Habsburg-Lorraine which ruled the lands of the Habsburg monarchy, the Empire of Austria, the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy, and the Kingdom of Hungary as well as the crown lands of Bohemia and Croatia by hereditary right until the end of World War I.
_________________
http://www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
Secret Rulers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0p-e2ng0SI
http://www.thisweek.org.uk
http://www.dialectradio.co.uk
http://www.911forum.org.uk |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
