Bilderberg.org

[CJ]

lol

[rothschild desmarais]

Maybe the topic they are into are too divisive to have strong planification.

They have to integrate the shanguai cooperation group, the arab league, the african union, the mercosur and the asean to be relevant.

Tough job.

They need to convince voters that rfid could be dealt in a democratic way.

Which is very difficult because nobody is neutral on the issue, not even people who are against it.

It would only work if a combination of elected overseers would each have a different responsibility, one to look at whom to pay to watch if cases could be brought to justice and the other one to veto inquiries in case first elected is corrupted.

Too, there would be a need for an elected chairman to put on the table cases that are too big to be handle only by local leaders.

This at the same time that school elections, cities elections and national elections are having low turnout.

It would be huge for transparency and integration of mental ilness in the workforce, but how to deal with all that without getting one other aristocracy that is there for ideological conformism.

The principle of consumers price for consuming, workers pay increase in shareholding and the advertisement of securities (derivatives trading) to guarantee that risks are spreaded.

These 3 topics could be accepted both by bilderbergs and altermondialist.

I still think using canadian land for humanitarian duties on sudan and elsewhere could lower the opposition created by elites to make sure the nationalist are fighting each others.

China still have 1000 billions to spend and they want to come cleaner for the olympics, they just said they would invest in infrastructures in usa.

War-torn populations would help lower the differencials in demographics for maybe the 20 years at risk of excessive competition, and the capacity of occidentalist to deal with mental ilness and health care problems would be more efficient when dealt in their more stable territories.

All this if transparency by bilderbergers, communist boss in china and islamist monarchs is strongly pushed by us.

Lets just work for this.

The collateralized debt obligation market is largely secretive.

The shareholding by chinese non-elected militaries in business is too.

Not to forget the efficiency of money invested by islamist monarchs...
(al-jazeera is one of the exception)
_________________
If you want doha, you've got to give us tobin.

L'état devrait s'occuper d'aider les petites entreprises et le programme d'éducation des petites villes.

[Dragon]

It appears that there is some sort of plan working here. This story appeared in this web site:



http://www.rawstory.com/



That link may not take you to the original story, as it appeared a number of days ago. The original story came from the Washington Post.----Dragon

The Department of Defense's number two official appears to imply in a memo that the Global War on Terrorism will end just in time for the presidential election in November 2008. The contents of the document are outlined in a column in today's Washington Post.

Al Kamen, who writes the Post's "In The Loop" column, cited a pair of memos written by Deputy Secretary of Defense Gordon England in today's paper. The first memo was written Dec. 6 and sent to top military and civilian officials. It identifies eight priorities for the coming fiscal year, and the first of them is to "Win the Global War on Terrorism."

In a second memo from Feb. 15, England writes that "to ensure that warfighters and taxpayers receive maximum benefit from on-going initiatives, it would be highly desirable to complete current projects by the summer/fall of 2008."

England then provides a quarterly grid with the same eight priorities from the December memo and "expected milestone conclusion dates" for each one.

As Kamen points out, the first priority of winning the global terror war from the earlier memo is included on the grid, and "looks to be over around October 2008."

The next presidential election will occur in November 2008, a month later.

Kamen's full column can be accessed at the Washington Post's website.
_________________
Z-Force Group. Arizona's Global Tyranny First Response Team.

[samuel]

In one think-tank that kissinger and schlesinger (advised by black and zakheim), the National Interest a new strategy is building up on dealing with russia and china

China:
Ashton b. Carter and William F. Perry
Both are co-director of the preventive defense project (joint research harvard/stanford U)

They propose joint military operation (china-usa) such as search-and-rescue, counter-terrorism-piracy-narcotics-human trafficking, humanitarian relief, non-combatant evacuation and peacekeeping.

They advise US not to use non-market methods to deny access to ressources needed for economic development.

They remain commited to advance strategic deployment of budget devoted to military in both USA and China.

Russia:
Gary Hart (Wirth chair in the U of colorado, former US sen.)

They believe in the repealing of the jackson-Vanik amendment that deny normal trade relations to russia by US (1974 measures used as leverage to liberate US sensible operatives still in use today).

They ask for the replicate of commercial relations that is now with saudi.

Finally they ask for free-trade in the domain of telecommunications, health care and logistics IT*

*industrial modernization..i believe they mean this more precise sector in industrial transportation.

Also in one article they speak about why security matters more than liberty ( Security First- Ours, theirs and the global order's- by Amitai Etzioni from George washington university).

It starts with the premise that one cannot stop genocide without bringing home body bags.

Also to not be killed, maimed or tortured should come first as human rights.
_________________
What is possible if you take into account the amount of cynism by the majority who vote?