Bilderberg.org Forum Index Bilderberg.org
the view from the top of the pyramid of power
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

lol

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bilderberg.org Forum Index -> English language Bilderberg Free, Exploratory, Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
CJ
Suspended


Joined: 02 Aug 2006
Posts: 540
Location: London

PostPosted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 12:18 pm    Post subject: lol Reply with quote

lol

Last edited by CJ on Wed Aug 06, 2008 9:26 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
TonyGosling
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 26 Jul 2006
Posts: 1398
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, UK

PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 2:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Freemasons open a lodge at Buckingham Palace... but the Queen isn't amused
By SARAH OLIVER - More by this author » Last updated at 23:59pm on 8th March 2008


Duke of Kent as Masonic Grand Master

A Royal Mason: The Duke of Kent is the organisation's Grand Master

A branch of the Freemasons secret society is being formed by members of the Royal Household and police who protect the Royal Family.

And their decision to call it The Royal Household Lodge has put them on a collision course with Buckingham Palace – as has their plan to co-opt the royal cipher – EIIR – for their regalia, to underline their connection to the Queen.

Although the Queen's cousin, the Duke of Kent, is head of the secretive organisation – he is Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England – the new branch has not gone down well with the Royal Family.

The Palace has no power to halt the formation of the lodge, but it is determined to stop it adopting its chosen name and block it from hijacking the Queen's EIIR.

Use of the Royal Household title and any related symbols requires official permission.

Angry officials clearly feel the new lodge's proposed name is the last thing the Palace needs at a time when it is trying to be seen as more modern and open.

Last night, a spokesman for the Queen said: “Buckingham Palace has not, and would not, endorse this sort of arrangement. No permission has been given by the Palace for a Buckingham Palace lodge or anything similar.

“If permission is sought, it will be declined.”

The founding of the lodge has also alarmed some Royal staff who do not wish to be associated with the fraternity famed for bizarre initiation rites, mystical regalia and mysterious codes of conduct.

It is also likely to cause consternation among career women in the Palace, as it is a men-only organisation.

Non-members in Royal service are said to be fearful they will be overlooked for prestigious promotions and left unsupported in any below-stairs clashes.

Masons are widely believed to further the business and professional interests of brother Masons, although they would deny this and claim it is a harmless social and charitable organisation.

The lodge, which will not meet at the Palace but will be based in a Masonic Hall elsewhere, will be open to all members of the Royal Household, from armed police protection officers to below-stairs staff such as pages and footmen.

It will also recruit staff in other Royal residences including Windsor Castle, Clarence House and St James's Palace.

A Palace insider said: “There's a lot of consternation and rightly so. People fear a lot of business will now be conducted behind closed doors so that those who don't sign up to Freemasonry can't have any effect on it.

“They are concerned that Masons will be preferred and those who aren't Masons will be written out of the script.

“Backstairs life is already complicated enough – there are all sorts of allegiances and cliques and cabals. People fall in and out of favour and there's a lot of whispering in ears.

“The last thing the household needs is a secret society, especially one with the reputation of Freemasonry.”

The United Grand Lodge of England issued the Royal Household Lodge with a warrant in June last year although it will not formally exist until the consecration ceremony on May 19 at the Freemasons' Hall in London.

That will be followed by a celebration dinner for up to 300 Masons and their guests at the historic Lincoln's Inn.

The insider said the idea had been generated by serving and past members of the Royalty Protection Squad, SO14. With new recruits, the total number involved is approximately 70.

Author and broadcaster Martin Short, whose book Inside The Brotherhood exposed Masonic practices in the UK, said: “It's a catastrophic time to start such a lodge, given all the problems facing the Royal Family at present.

“The Royal Family is desperately trying to prove it is modernising – in PR terms, this is bad news for them.”


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=528751&in_page_id=1770


10 people have commented on this story so far. Tell us what you think below.

Here's a sample of the latest comments published. You can click view all to read all comments that readers have sent in.

These secret societies should have their secrets exposed!

- Stephen Holmes, Withington Manchester

The Royals are steeped in Freemasonry and the article
fails to mention that the resident Prince Philip is a also powerful member. Freemasons are the maggots on the carcass of Democracy and if it were the case that they are a society with secrets rather than a secret society, the top echelons of the Police, CPS and Judiciary would declare their affiliations to it. The democratic tenet is plain and simple. A Mason in charge of any Establishment function cannot serve the public whilst concurrently serving the interests of a secret society.

- Dr Melvin T Gray, Huddersfield uk

Despite the misleading headline, it is not proposed that the Lodge should meet at the Palace.

Many Lodges are made up of affinity groups, whose members share mutual interests and backgrounds, not with a view to career progression however.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=528751&in_page_id=1770
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bilderberg.org Forum Index -> English language Bilderberg Free, Exploratory, Discussion Forum All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group