Bilderberg.org Forum Index Bilderberg.org
the view from the top of the pyramid of power
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Why dark forces would want Diana dead

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bilderberg.org Forum Index -> Diana, Princess of Wales - d. 31st August 1997
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
CJ
Suspended


Joined: 02 Aug 2006
Posts: 540
Location: London

PostPosted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 12:23 pm    Post subject: Why dark forces would want Diana dead Reply with quote

Lets consider why the NWO would want Diana dead. She was about to marry a Muslim, she has previously stated that if she re-married, she would like more children....this alone, is enough for the NWO to have her removed.

She had campaigned to have landmines banned...what would she have banned in the future, cluster bombs, DU munitions?

She was about to setup a rival court in Paris. This would have resulted in a perment UK/global press besed in Paris covering just this court...not very good for the Queen! Before she died, she was holidaying in the South of France with Dodi on daddies big boat. Could you imagine William and Harry returning from a holiday this summer with mummy and their half brothers and sisters, who are Muslim??

I have read that her assassination was a CIA plot in name. Lord Stevens received information pointing him in the direction of the CIA, Stevens also implies that MI6 was involved (Putney offices burgled) and that a team from MI6 was at the UK Embassy in Paris and that on the night in question, the Royal family was in direct contact with a RF employee in Paris.

I have read that pictures of Diana exist showing her as walking wounded...nowhere near death. Walking in the tunnel and sitting in the back of an open doored ambulance. It is also suggested that a "specialist" (CIA term) was waiting in the tunnel, he is the man who was "reported" leaning into the car window...he made sure that Dodi was dead by breaking his neck. The official plan was that Dodi was the principle target. Diana couldn`t marry a dead man. But the question of Diana being pregnant was an issue and the official plan had Diana having a "scrap" (obortion) in the ambulance, hence the staggering time taken to get to hospital.

At this point, the official plan is binned...Diana bleeds to death in a Paris side street. Who ordered this break from plan isn`t clear. Lord Stevens on GMTV really let the cat out of the bag. But I now doubt he`ll deliver the truth...it reminds me of John Stalker quiting over his excellent investigation over "shoot to kill". Stalker was selected to fail, but exceeded all expectation. My father pointed this out and said he`ll be forced to quit, and that was weeks prior to him quitting!

After her devorce from Charles, Diana made a trip to the US...almost an unofficial state visit. It was big in the US. It is "suggested" by some, that the plan was to have Diana remarry an Amerikan. The 3 potential candidates were Clinton, Bush and a Kennedy, who is now dead...all were married, this is the strange aspect of this "suggested" theory. When Diana met in private with Hilary Clinton, Hilary disclosed an act of deadly passion (alledged suicide by a Hilary lover still holding the GUN) which so disturbed Diana, that she fled back to the UK...this left the media in shock. The plan was to have Diana marry a well known Amerikan who would be followed by a vast media court. This would drag the UK toward the US and detach the UK from Europe. This theory is based on the idea that there are two rival factions which make up the NWO. Now I`m only recanting what I`ve read, and in no way is this made up by me. But I do believe the account of Diana`s assassination. The rest is a possible, you must remember, "fact is often much stranger than fiction"...9/11 and all that!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
fields_of_drugs



Joined: 23 Oct 2006
Posts: 2
Location: find me moderators

PostPosted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 12:00 am    Post subject: Topic On Infidelity Reply with quote

The reason for princess Di would have considered infidelity, to boost Middle Eastern relations?
_________________
priceless brooms for sale... come talk to me and only discuss pricess for brooms from me and pricless (1 mil us $ from me). Mention or yell when around me, "brooms for sale"....if you are bilderberger, you know who I am, or any other facton.....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CJ
Suspended


Joined: 02 Aug 2006
Posts: 540
Location: London

PostPosted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 8:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I`m back!!! Why on Earth would the powers at be, use Di to boost ME relations...all but Syria are client states of the West.

Princes Di would have had more effect on moving the Americans and British closer together by re-marrying a wealthy/powerful American....this NWO stunt failed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
dilipv



Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hi all,
Dian got divorce on 28 August 1996. The major reason is that in the late 1980s, the marriage of Diana and Charles fell apart, an event at first suppressed, then sensationalised, by the world media. Both the Prince and Princess of Wales allegedly spoke to the press through friends, each blaming the other for the marriage's demise. Charles resumed his old, pre-marital affair with Camilla Parker Bowles, while Diana had an affair with her riding instructor, James Hewitt.

So, the English Dark force don't like such things about their Price of Wales , hence may it is the reason for Diana dead.

Dilip

Nursing Jobs
(Jobsite provides Nursing, Childcare, and Social-care jobs)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TonyGosling
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 26 Jul 2006
Posts: 998
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, UK

PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 2:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think it's pretty smple

1. she had evidence the royal family's ancestry was forged
2. the NWO didn't want William and Harry to have Muslim half-siblings
3. the land mines campaigning was showing up the royals as war mongers
4. she was more media-savvy and media-friendly (ie lied less) than the royals


Last edited by TonyGosling on Wed Jun 10, 2015 12:22 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
JosephKL08
Banned


Joined: 05 Mar 2015
Posts: 1
Location: United States

PostPosted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 5:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dian got separate on 28 August 1996. The real reason is that in the late 1980s, the marriage of Diana and Charles went to pieces, an occasion at the outset stifled, then sensationalized, by the world media. Both the Prince and Princess of Wales supposedly addresses the press through companions, every reprimanding the other for the marriage's death. Charles continued his old, premarital issue with Camilla Parker Bowles, while Diana had an unsanctioned romance with her riding educator, James Hewitt.

Thus, the English Dark power dislike such things about their Price of Wales , consequently might it is the purpose behind Diana dead.
_________________
Try out our free Testking mcat prep courses and latest comptia Testking juniper training
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bilderberg.org Forum Index -> Diana, Princess of Wales - d. 31st August 1997 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group